摘要
柏拉图的政治学说是政治化了的伦理学,是对苏格拉底思想的偷渡。亚里士多德的政治思维正相反,他通过批判其师柏拉图而回归到苏格拉底的立场,换言之,与柏拉图相比,亚里士多德的政治思维更接近于苏格拉底道德优先的原则。在柏拉图和亚里士多德之后,政治思维更明显地趋向于形而上层面与形而下层面的对立,趋向于精神世界与行为世界的对立。
Plato's politics may be defined as 'political-ethics', which furtively crosses Socrates' thought. On the contrary Aristotle' thought regresses Socrates',and morality has priority to the political requirement again. After Plato and Aristotle, politics is divided according to other standards, that is to say the conflicting of political ideas obviously turn to the metaphysics and physics, and even the mental world and the material world.
出处
《湘潭大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》
北大核心
2005年第3期37-41,共5页
Journal of Xiangtan University:Philosophy And Social Sciences
