期刊文献+

血清肿瘤标志物异常者^(18)F-FDG PET显像的应用价值 被引量:2

To Evaluate Retrospectively the Impact of ^(18)F-FDG PET
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的:回顾性分析18F-FDGPET显像在血清肿瘤标志物异常而其他影像学检查阴性或不能提供明确的诊断的患者中的应用价值。材料和方法:血清肿瘤标志物升高的患者21例,其他影像学检查结果为阴性,或不能得出明确结论。所有患者均接受全身18F-FDGPET显像,血清肿瘤标志物检查于18F-FDGPET显像前2周内进行。每一位患者的最终诊断均得自于手术/活检的病理学结论或1年以上的随访的基础之上。结果:18F-FDGPET评价血清肿瘤标志物升高患者的敏感性为92.3%(12/13),特异性为62.5%(5/8),准确性为81.0%(17/21),阳性预期值为80%(12/15),阴性预期值为83.3%(5/6)。结论:对于不明原因的血清肿瘤标志物升高的患者,18F-FDGPET全身显像具有重要的意义,将有可能改变对这些患者进一步的治疗措施。 To evaluate retrospectively the impact of [ 18 F] fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomog-raphy( 18 F-FDG PET)on the detection of patients with elevated tumor markers levels but negative or equivocal other imaging modality results.Materials and Methods:Whole-body 18 F-FDG PET was performed in21patients with asymptomatic tumor marker increase but negative or equivocal other imaging modality results.A blood sample was drawn in each case for marker assay14days or less before the day performing the 18 F-FDG PET.The final diagnosis was established by operation/biopsy histopathological findings or clinical follow-up for more than1year.Results:The diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of18F-FDG PET in patients with asymptomatically elevated tumor markers were92.3%(12/13)and62.5%(5/8),accuracy81.0%(17/21),positive and negative predictive value80%(12/15)and83.3%(5/6).Conclusions: 18 F-FDG PET is a useful technique for asymptomatically elevated tu-mor markers levels and has an important clinical impact on the management of these patients.
出处 《中国医学计算机成像杂志》 CSCD 2005年第3期205-207,共3页 Chinese Computed Medical Imaging
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Raileanu I, Rusu V, Stefanescu C, et al. ^18 F FDG PET - Applications in Oncology. Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Iasi, 2002,106: 14 ~ 23
  • 2Czernin J. Clinical applications of FDG ~ PET in oncology. Acta Med Austriaca, 2002,29:162 ~ 170
  • 3Sasaki M. Clinical usefulness of FDG - PET in oncology. Nippon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi, 2001,61: 414 ~ 420
  • 4Chang WC, Hung YC, Lin CC, et al. Usefulness of FDG - PET to detect recurrent cervical cancer based on asymptomatically elevated tumor marker serum levels-a preliminary report. Cancer Invest, 2004, 22: 180 ~ 184
  • 5Maldonado A, Peiro V V, Poveda A, et al. Role of FDG - PET in the diagnosis of recurrent medullary thyroid carcinoma based on rising tumor marker levels. Clin Positron Imaging, 1999,2:320
  • 6Chang WC, Hung YC, Kao CH, et al. Usefulness of whole body positron emission tomography (PET) with 18F- fluoro - 2 - deoxyglucose (FDG) to detect recurrent ovarian cancer based on asymptomatically elevated serum levels of tumor marker. Neoplasma, 2002,49:329 ~ 333
  • 7Liu CS, Shen YY, Lin CC, et al. Clinical impact of (18F) FDGPET in patients with suspected recurrent breast cancer based on asymptomatically elevated tumor marker serum levels: a preliminary report. Jpn J Clin Oncol, 2002 , 32: 244 ~ 247
  • 8Bleeker - Rovers CP, de Kleijn EM, Corstens FH, et al. Clinical value of FDG PET in patients with fever of unknown origin and patients suspected of focal infection or inflammation. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging, 2004,31:29 ~ 37
  • 9Mochizuki T, Tsukamoto E, Kuge Y, et al. FDG uptake and glucose transporter subtype expressions in experimental tumor and inflammation models. J Nucl Med , 2001,42: 1551~ 1555
  • 10Watanabe K, Nomori H, Ohtsuka T, et al. False negative cases of F - 18 fluorodeoxyglucose - positron emission tomography (FDG - PET) imaging in small lung cancer less than 3 cm in size.Nihon Kokyuki Gakkai Zasshi, 2004,42:787 ~ 793

同被引文献11

  • 1吴湖炳,王全师,王明芳,郭晓君,唐刚华.^(18)F-FDG PET显像在血清CEA水平升高者中的应用价值[J].中华核医学杂志,2006,26(3):164-164. 被引量:4
  • 2Tomita M, Shimizu, Ayabe T, et al.Maximum SUV on positron emission tomography and serum CEA level as prognostic factors after curative resection for non-small lung cancer[J].Asian Pac J Clin Oncol, 2012, 8(3): 244-247.
  • 3Grunuet M, Sorensen J B.Careinoembryonic antigen(CEA) as tumor marker in lung eaneer[J].Lung Cancer, 2012, 76(2): 138-143.
  • 4Tomita M, Shimizu T, Ayabe T, et al.Prognostic significance of turnout marker index based on preoperative CEA and CYFRA21-1in non-small cell lung cancer[J].Anticancer Res, 2010, 30(7): 3099-3102.
  • 5Cedres S, Nunez I, Longo M, et al.Serum tumor markers CEA, CYFRA21-1, and CA-125 are associated with worse prognosis'in advancerd non-small-cell lung cancer(NSCLC)[J].Clin Lung Cancer, 2011, 12(3): 127-129.
  • 6Hossein J A, bass A, Sanjiv S G.18F-FDG uptake in lung breast, ant colon cancers: molecular biology correlates and disease characterization[J]. J Nucl Med, 2009, 50(1): 1820-1825.
  • 7Miwa M, Yoshiki D, Takeshi I, et al.The Effectiveness of lgF-FDG PET/ CT combined with STIR MRI for diagnosing nodal involvement in the thorax[J].J Nucl Med, 2009, 50(2): g1-87.
  • 8王波,周乃康.正电子发射断层在肺癌诊治中的应用进展[J].临床军医杂志,2009,37(3):492-494. 被引量:3
  • 9张斌青,安锐,张永学,孙逊,吴涛,贾清.PET-CT在结直肠癌术后CEA、CA19-9升高患者中的应用[J].肿瘤研究与临床,2010,22(5):297-299. 被引量:3
  • 10王颖,李亚明,尹雅芙,李雪娜.^(18)F-FDG PET/CT对于直肠癌术后CEA升高原因不详的临床应用价值[J].中国临床医学影像杂志,2010,21(9):664-666. 被引量:2

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部