期刊文献+

Effect of water-soluble contrast in colorectal surgery: A prospective randomized trial 被引量:1

Effect of water-soluble contrast in colorectal surgery: A prospective randomized trial
暂未订购
导出
摘要 AIM: Postoperative gastrointestinal-tract motility is normally delayed. Early feeding after colorectal surgery has been reported recently, but late feeding is common. Gastrografin not only enhances bowel peristalsis, but also decreases bowel-wall edema. Whether contrast medium allows early oral feeding and reduces the duration of hospitalization requires clarification. METHODS: Fifty patients underwent elective colorectal surgery In a regional medical center. Patients were prosp-ectively randomized into a Gastrografin group or control group (n=25 each). Patients in the Gastrografin group began their feeding schedule with 100 mL of 5% dextrose water with 100 mL of Gastrografin on postoperative d 3 and were advanced to a full liquid diet when the contrast reached the colon in 4 h. Patients in the control group began their feeding schedule with 200 mL of 5% dextrose water on postoperative d 3 and were advanced to a full liquid diet after the passage of flatus and stool. Nasogastric tubes were inserted for persistent postoperative vomiting. Fullness, nausea, vomiting, complications, time of anesthesia, time of operation, time of mobilization, time of oral feeding, and duration of hospital stay were recorded and analyzed with Student's t-test. RESULTS: In the Gastrografin group, one patient had aspiration pneumonia and one patient had anastomotic leakage resulting in sepsis and eventual death. This mortality was excluded from the subsequent statistical analysis. In the control group, two patients had wound infections. There was no significant difference between the two groups at the time of anesthesia, time of operation, or time of mobilization. There were significant differences between the two groups in the time of oral feeding (3.3±0.3 d in the Gastrografin group VS 4.8±0.4 d in the control group; P=odds ratio--, 95%CI [-0.5 to +0.7 d]) and in the length of hospital stay (7.6±1.1 d in the Gastrografin group VS 10.2±1.3 d in the control group; P=odds ratio--, 95% CI [-1.2 to +1.4 d]). CONCLUSION: Gastrografin not only allowed early oral feeding but also reduced the duration of hospitalization after elective colorectal surgery. AIM: Postoperative gastrointestinal-tract motility is normally delayed. Early feeding after colorectal surgery has beenreposed recently, but late feeding is common. Gastrografin not only enhances bowel peristalsis, but also decreases bowel-wall edema. Whether contrast medium allows early oral feeding and reduces the duration of hospitalization requires clarification.METHODS: Fifty patients underwent elective colorectal surgery in a regional medical center. Patients were prospectively randomized into a Gastrografin group or control group (n = 25 each). Patients in the Gastrografin group began their feeding schedule with 100 mL of 5% dextrose water with 100 mL of Gastrografin on postoperative d 3 and were advanced to a full liquid diet when the contrast reached the colon in 4 h. Patients in the control group began their feeding schedule with 200 mL of 5% dextrosewater on postoperative d 3 and were advanced to a full liquid diet after the passage of flatus and stool. Nasogastric tubes were inserted for persistent postoperative vomiting. Fullness, nausea, vomiting, complications, time of anesthesia, time of operation, time of mobilization, time of oral feeding, and duration of hospital stay were recorded and analyzed with Student's t-test.RESULTS: In the Gastrografin group, one patient hadaspiration pneumonia and one patient had anastomotic leakage resulting in sepsis and eventual death. This mortality was excluded from the subsequent statistical analysis. In the control group, two patients had wound infections. There was no significant difference between the two groups at the time of anesthesia, time of operation, or time of mobilization. There were significant differences between the two groups in the time of oral feeding (3.3±0.3 d in the Gastrografin group vs4.8±0.4 d in the control group; P = odds ratio--, 95%CI [-0.5 to +0.7 d]) and in the length of hospital stay (7.6±1.1 d in the Gastrografingroup vs10.2±1.3 d in the control group; P = odds ratio--, 95% CI [-1.2 to +1.4 d]).CONCLUSION: Gastrografin not only allowed early oralfeeding but also reduced the duration of hospitalizationafter elective colorectal surgery.
出处 《World Journal of Gastroenterology》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2005年第18期2802-2805,共4页 世界胃肠病学杂志(英文版)
关键词 Colorectal surgery CONTRAST GASTROGRAFIN 水溶性 结肠手术 直肠手术 术后 肠动力 胃功能
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

  • 1Condon RE, Sama SK. Motility after abdominal surgery. Clin Gastroenterol 1982; 11:609-620.
  • 2Smith J, Kelly KA, Weinshilboum RM. Pathophysiology of postoperative ileus. Arch Surg, 1977; 112:202-209.
  • 3Reissman P, Teoh TA, Cohen SM, Weiss EG, Nogueras JJ,Wexner SD. Is early oral feeding safer after elective colorectal surgery? A prospective randomized trial. Ann Surg 1995;222:73-77.
  • 4Blackmon S, Lucius C, Wilson JP, Duncan T, Wilson R, Mason EM, Ramshaw B. The use of water-soluble contrast in evaluating clinically equivocal small bowel obstructions. Am Surg 2000; 66:238-244.
  • 5Chen SC, Chang KJ, Lee PH, Wang SM, Chen KM, Lin FY.Oral Urografin in postoperative small bowel obstruction. World J Surg 1999; 23:1051-1054.
  • 6Chen SC, Lin FY, Lee PH, Yu SC, Wang SM, Chang KJ. Water-soluble contrast study predicts the need for early surgery in adhesive small bowel obstruction. Br J Surg 1998; 85:1692-1694.
  • 7Wilson MS, Ellis H, Menzies D, Moran BJ, Parker MC, Thompson JN. A review of the management of small bowel obstruction. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1999; 81:320-328.
  • 8Choi HK, Chu KW, Law WL. Therapeutic value of gastrografin in adhesive small bowel obstruction after unsuccessful conservative treatment: a prospective randomized trial. Ann Surg 2002; 236:1-6.
  • 9Assalia A, Schein M, Kopelman D, Hirshberg A, Hashmonai M. Therapeutic effect of oral Gastrografin in adhesive, partial small-bowel obstruction: A prospective randomized trial.Surgery 1994; 115:433-437.
  • 10Feigin E, Seror D, Szold A, Carmon M, Allweis TM, Nissan A, Gross E, Vromen A, Freund HR. Water-soluble contrast material has no therapeutic effect on postoperative small-bowel obstruction: Results of a prospective randomized clinical trial. Am J Surg 1996; 171:227-229.

同被引文献2

引证文献1

二级引证文献73

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部