摘要
傅斯年与钱穆,都堪称中国近现代学术史上有着自己鲜明的学术个性和学术思想的史学大师。傅斯年是科学派的领军人物,治学主实证求真;钱穆实际上则是新儒家学派的中坚,治学主经世。实证求真学派、新儒家经世学派与马克思主义史学派,是中国20世纪20年代末到40年代末三足鼎立的三大史学流派。因之,从傅、钱二者的交往和关系看二者的学术思想及20世纪20年代末到40年代末的学术史是颇有代表意味的,给予吾人的启示意味深长。
Fu Ssu-nien and Qian Mu can both be regarded as great historians with distinct academic characters and thoughts. Fu was the leader of the scientific school who insisted on truth and positivism; and Qian was actually the key figure of the neo-Confucianism who advocated utility. Those two schools and the Marxist school were the three tripartite historical sects from the end of the 1920s to the end of the 1940s. Thus the contact and relation between Fu and Qian has quite representative meaning to their academic thoughts and even the history of academics during that period, therefore giving us much light.
出处
《文史哲》
CSSCI
北大核心
2005年第3期115-122,共8页
Literature,History,and Philosophy
关键词
傅斯年
钱穆
史学思想
学术史
Fu Ssu-nien
Qian Mu
Historical thoughts
Academic history
