3Smith,IT.Awekening the slumbering potential of the 4-quinolone antibacterials. Pharmaceutical Journal . 1984
4Griffiths,LR & Green,HT.Paradoxical effect of penicillin invivo. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy . 1985
5George,RH & Dyas,A.Paradoxical effect of penicillin in vivo. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy . 1986
6Crumplin,GC & Smith,JT.Nalidixic acid: an antibactreial paradox. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy . 1975
7Wolfson,Js & Hooper,DC.The fluoroquinolones: structures, Mechanisms, of action, retistance, and spectra of activity in vitra. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy . 1985
6[3]Amsterdam D. Postantibiotic Effect. In Lorian V: Antibiotics in Laboratory Medicine. 4th edit. Williams Wilkins. 1996: 52.
7[5]Gotteredsson M、 Erlendsdottir H、 Sigfusson A, et al. Characteristics and dynamics of bacterial populations during postantibitic effect determined by flow cytometry. Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy. 1998,42 (5): 1005.
8[8]Gottfresson M、 Erlendsdottir H、 Gudmundsson A et al. Different patterns of bacterial DNA synthesis during postantibiotic effect. Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy. 1995,39(6): 1314.
9[9]Piddock LJY、 Walters RN、 Diver JM. Correlation of quinolone MIC and inhibition of DNA, RNA, and protein synthesis and induction of the SOS response in Escherichia coli. Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy. 1990,4 (12):2331.
10[10]Lewin CS、 Howard BMA、 Ratcliffe NT et al. 4Quinolones and the SOS response. J Med Microbiol.1989,29: 139.
