期刊文献+

大脑皮质中央前回和后回的颅表投影的定位(头皮针定位研究) 被引量:2

The Surface Anatomic Observation of Cerebral Porecentral and Postcentral Gyrus for Scalp Acupuncture
暂未订购
导出
摘要 用10具头颅就头针运动区、感觉区的定位进行了观测。结果,中央前、后回的颅表投影位置均比教科书描述的运动区、感觉区靠后,其中中央前回上点靠后0.5厘米,下点在眉枕线与鬓发前缘交点后1.0厘米,中央后回上点靠后1.0厘米,下点在上述交点后2.4厘米,据此,作者认为头针运动区与感觉区的定位也应分别后移,并推荐:运动区上点取在前后正中线电或后1.0厘米,下点取在上述交点后1.0厘米;感觉区上点取在前后正中线中点后3.0厘米,下点取在交点后2.0厘米。这样,运动区、感觉区与大脑皮质中央前、后回的吻合明显提高,P<0.05。这种定位差异可能是临床头针疗效不稳定的原因。 10 heads of adult cadaver were used for investigation of the motor and sensory area of scalp acupuncture. The results are as follows: both the surface anatomy of precentral and postcentral gyrus were not exactly match with the tnotor and sensory area decribed in acupuncture textbook respectively. They were backward. Among them, the upper points were 0. 5cm backward to motor area and 1.Ocm to sensory area, the lower point of precentral gyrus was 1.0cm posterior to the intersecting point of the eyebrow-occiput line and the anterior border of the natural line of the hair at the temple, while the lower point of postcentral gyrus is 2. 4cm posterior to the intersecting point above described.Therefor, the authors suggested that the motor and seasory area of the scalp acupuncture should be backward and recommended: take the pount 1. 0cm and 3. 0cm posterior to the midpoint of anteroposterior midline as the upper point of motor and sensory area respectively, 1. 0cm and 2. 0cm posterior to the intersecting point above described as the lower point respectively. In this way, the motor and sensory areas are better rnatched with precentral and posrcentral gyrus than before (P<0.05).
出处 《针刺研究》 CAS CSCD 1994年第2期17-20,共4页 Acupuncture Research
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

共引文献14

同被引文献19

  • 1东贵荣,王钊,吴宝柱,张宣,张春英,杨宇.头穴治疗急性脑出血即刻效应的机理探讨(Ⅰ:针刺对体感诱发电位的影响)[J].中国针灸,1994,14(2):26-29. 被引量:72
  • 2东贵荣.急性脑出血CT定位电地形图的临床分析[J].脑血管病康复医学杂志,1993,1(3):45-45.
  • 3Harvey RL,Nudo RJ.Cortical brain stimulation: a poten- tial therapeutic agent for upper limb motor recovery fol- lowing stroke[J].Top Stroke Rehabil,2007,14:54-67.
  • 4Namba S, Nishimoto A. Stimulation of internal capsule, thalamic sensory nucleus(VPM) and cerebral cortex in- hibited deafferentation hyperactivity provoked after Gasse- rian ganglionectomy in cat[J]. Acta Neurochir, 1988, 42 (Suppl):S243-S247.
  • 5Tsubokawa T, Katayama Y, Yamamoto T, Hirayama T, Koyama S. Chronic motor cortex stimulation of the treat- ment of central pain[J]. Acta Neurochir, 1991(52):137- 139.
  • 6Meyerson BA, Lindblom U, Linderoth B, et al. Motor cortex as treatment of trigeminal neuropathic pain[J]. Ac- ta Neurochir, 1993,58(Suppl):S150"S153.
  • 7Brown JA. Motor cortex stimulation[J]. Neurosurg Focus, 2001( 11 ):1-5.
  • 8Lima MC, Fregni F. Motor cortex stimulation for chronic pain: systematic review and meta-analysis of the litera- ture[J]. Neurology , 2008,70:2329-2337.
  • 9Lefaucheur JP, Drouot X, Menard-Lefaucheur I, et al.Neuropathic pain controlled for more than a year by monthly sessions of repetitive transcranial magnetic stim- ulation of the motor cortex[J].Neurophysiol C1in,2004,34: 91-95.
  • 10Fonoff ET, Dale CS, Pagano RL, et al. Antinociception induced by epidural motor cortex stimulation in naive conscious rats is mediated by the opioid system[J]. Behav Brain Res, 2008,196:63-70.

引证文献2

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部