期刊文献+

声带息肉喉显微手术前后嗓音声学参数变化分析 被引量:3

VOICE ACOUSTIC PARAMETERS OF PRE- AND POST-MICROLARYNGOSCOPIC SURGERY FOR VOCAL POLYPS
暂未订购
导出
摘要 ①目的探讨声带息肉病人手术前后嗓音声学参数的变化与手术疗效的关系.②方法采用Dr.Speech软件对40例声带息肉病人术前、术后嗓音声学参数进行测试与比较.③结果 40例声带息肉病人术前声学参数值基频微扰、振幅微扰(shimmer)和声门噪声能量(NNE)均高于正常值;术后各项参数均有不同程度降低,术前与术后比较,差异均有极显著意义(F=101.09~125.27,q=14.17~23.86,P<0.01).术后第1周分别与术后第2周和第4周比较,各声学参数值差异均有显著性(q=4.34~7.79,P<0.01).术后第2周与术后第4周比较,各声学参数值差异无显著性(q=0.72~1.33,P>0.05).④结论嗓音声学检测中shimmer和NNE的声学参数值变化对手术前后疗效评估最有意义. Objective To analyze the relationship between the effect of microlaryngoscopic surgery of vocal polyps and the changes of voice parameters. Methods Voice acoustic parameters of 40 patients with vocal polyps were measured by Dr. Speech software and compared with the normal voice before and after operation. Results The preoperative jitters, shimmer and NNE parameters were higher than those of the normal voice. All the postoperative parameters became significantly lower than the preoperative ones (F=101.09-125.27, q=14.17-23.86, P<0.01). The jitters, shimmer and NNE were different significantly between one week and two weeks or four weeks postoperatively (q=4.34-7.79, P<0.01), but not different significantly between two weeks and four weeks postoperatively (q=0.72-1.33,P>0.05). Conclusion The shimmer and NNE parameters are of great significance to evaluate the effect of microlaryngoscopic surgery of the vocal polyp.
作者 李薇 张晓恒
出处 《青岛大学医学院学报》 CAS 2005年第1期29-30,共2页 Acta Academiae Medicinae Qingdao Universitatis
关键词 声带息肉 嗓音声学分析 显微外科手术 vocal polyps voice acoustic analysis microsurgery
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

  • 1黄昭鸣,黄鹤年,陈玉琰. 喉功能临床测量和嗓音治疗的新理论与新技术[M]. Seattle: Tiger DRS Inc, 1999. 25~35.

共引文献1

同被引文献16

  • 1徐文,韩德民,侯丽珍,张丽,叶京英,王军.喉良性增生性病变的嗓音学特点及治疗转归[J].临床耳鼻咽喉科杂志,2004,18(9):526-529. 被引量:31
  • 2于萍,韩冰,杨伟炎,韩东一.不同性别嗓音客观检测参数的对比分析[J].听力学及言语疾病杂志,2004,12(6):390-392. 被引量:25
  • 3韩仲明,杨式麟.用电子计算机对健康人嗓音微扰值及谐噪比的分析[J].中国医科大学学报,1989,18(1):62-64. 被引量:10
  • 4Jacobson BH,Johnson A,Grywalsky C,et al.Silbergleit A,Benninger M.The voice handicap index (VHI).development and validation.Am J Speech Lang Pathol,1997,6:66-70.
  • 5Courey MS,Shohet JA,Scott MA,et al.Immunohistochemical characterization of benign laryngeal lesions.Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol,1996,105(7):525-531.
  • 6Sato K,Hirano M,Nakashima T.Electron microscopic and immunohistochemical investigation of Reinke's edema.Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol,1999,108(11 Pt1):1068-1072.
  • 7Yanagihara N.Significance of harmonic changes and noise components in hoarseness.J Speech Hear Res,1967,10(3):531-541.
  • 8Isshiki N,Kitajima K,Kojima H,Harita Y.Turbulent Noise in Dysphonia.Folia Phoniatr,1978,30(3):214-224.
  • 9Uloza V,Saferis V,Uloziene I.Perceptual and acoustic assessment of voice pathology and the efficacy of endolaryngeal phono microsurgery.Journal of Voice,2005,19(1):138-145.
  • 10王明方,常捷燕,李宁,杨立军.声带息肉、小结患者声谱图参数测试[J].临床耳鼻咽喉科杂志,1997,11(7):319-320. 被引量:10

引证文献3

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部