期刊文献+

论大槽子组和碳山坪组的地质时代 被引量:3

Geological age of the Dacaozi and Tangshanping Formations
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 大槽子剖面位于云南省宁蒗县城以南约25km处,是原云南省第二区域地质测量队于70年代发现和测制的,并对泥盆纪地层作了划分、对比和命名。由下而上分别是大瓜坪组、大槽子组、碳山坪组、烂泥箐组和干沟组,其中将大瓜坪组划归早泥盆世晚期,大槽子组和碳山坪组分别与艾菲尔阶和吉维特阶对比,烂泥箐组和干沟组分别与弗拉阶和法门阶对应。大槽子剖面地处泥盆系青藏区和华南区交界处(王钰等1982)。 The Dacaozi and Tangshanping Formations, proposed by the Regional Geological Survey Team of Yunnan, are well-exposed at the Dacaozi section of Ninglang county, Yunnan province and characterized by clastic and carboniceous deposits containing a benthic community, such as corals, brachiopods, ostracodes. The Dacaozi Formation has been referred to the Eifelian age, but recent discovery of a number of ostracodes in it indicates a late Emsian age, i. e. this formation may be correlated with all or a part of Sipai Formation in Guangxi. The lower and middle parts of the Tangshanping Formation, which was considered as of the Givetian age, are probably referred to late Emsian to early Eifelian ages according to the ostracode assemblage in them, while the conodont Spathognathodus exiguus (Philip, 1966) obtained from the middle part of this formation generally indicates an Early Devonian age (oral comm. of Wang C. Y.).This paper also has a tendency to refer these formations to the 'Xiangzh-ou Type' Devonian sediments due to their similarity to the Ertang, Sipai and Yingtang Formations, typical 'Xiangzhou Type' strata, in the lithological features and ostracode assemblages.
出处 《地层学杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 1989年第2期144-147,119,共5页 Journal of Stratigraphy
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1王尚启,古生物学报,1989年,28卷,2期
  • 2王尚启,古生物学报,1988年,27卷,1期
  • 3孔磊,地层学杂志,1985年,9卷,2期
  • 4刘玉明,微体古生物学报,1985年,2卷,2期
  • 5孙金英,中国地质科学院宜昌地质矿产研究所所刊,1985年,9期
  • 6王尚启,中国科学院南京地质古生物研究所集刊,1983年,18期
  • 7王尚启,中国科学院南京地质古生物研究所丛刊,1982年,5期
  • 8王钰,中国泥盆纪地层对比表及说明书,1982年
  • 9蒋志文,中国微体古生物学会第一次学术会议论文选集,1981年
  • 10团体著者,西南地区区域地层表.云南省分册,1978年

同被引文献82

引证文献3

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部