摘要
应用自动血细胞分析仪（ＳｙｓｍｅｘＦ－８００）对１０８例已知原因血尿患者进行了尿红细胞容积分布曲线（ＥＶＤＣ）及尿红细胞平均体积（ＭＣＶ）测定，并与相差显微镜（ＰＣＭ）检查结果相比较，结果表明肾小球性血尿和非肾小球性血尿的ＥＶＤＣ敏感性分别为９７．３０％和９４．１２／，ＭＣＶ值分别为５７．７７±２０．５９ｆｌ和１１０．７１±１８．９７ｆｌ，作者也对ＥＶＤＣ及ＰＣＭ两种方法进行比较，认为尿红细胞容积分布曲线对血尿来源判断提供了一种客观、简便、快速、无创伤性的方法，与ＰＣＭ一样，当出血部位虽来自肾脏，但其量较多或肉眼血尿时，ＥＶＤＣ及ＰＣＭ可靠性降低，应引起注意。
he urinary erythrocyte volume distri-bution curves (EVDC) and mean
copuscularvolume (MCV) were determined from auto-mated blood-cell analyzer (System F-800)
in108 patients with know source of hematuri-a. The results showed the sensibility ofEVDC in
identification of glomerular andnon-glomerular hematuria was 97. 03% and94. 12%
respectively, and mean copuscularvolume was 57. 77±20. 59fl and 110. 71 ±18. 97fl
respectively . We also compared thernethod of EVDS with phase-contrast mi-croscopy tPCMJ .
We conclude the EVDC of-fers an objective, simple,rapid and invasivemethod for identifying tbe
source of hema-turia. It should be noted that, as PCM,thereliability of EVDC will decrease when
thearnounts of renal bleeding is larger or withgross hematu ria .
出处
《肾脏病与透析肾移植杂志》
CAS
CSCD
1994年第6期459-461,共3页
Chinese Journal of Nephrology,Dialysis & Transplantation
关键词
尿
红细胞容积
血尿
血细胞分析
诊断
urinary erythrocyte
vol-ume cu rves hematu ria
automatedblood -cell analyzer
