期刊文献+

长效硝苯地平与长效美托洛尔的动态降压作用比较 被引量:2

Comparison of ambulatory hypotensive effects with long-acting metoprolol and nifedipine
原文传递
导出
摘要 12例原发性高血压患者(男性5例,女性7例;年龄40±4a)自身交叉服用长效硝苯地平(下称Nif)20mg, qm×2wk;长效美托洛尔(下称Met)0.1g, qm×2wk。结果:踏车运动试验时服Njf者血压及心率明显升高;但服Met者能平稳地控制血压及心率。24h动态血压中平均动脉压在服上述2药后均显著下降(P<0.05),服Met者舒张压、心率下降较明显(P<0.05),且不良反应小,故Met优于Nif。 Twelve patients (M5, F7; age 40 ?4a) with primary hypertension underwent a crossover study with oral administration of sustained-release formulations of nifedipine tablet 20 mg, each morning at 8AM X 2 wk and metoprolol tablet 0.1g, each morning at 8 AM X 2 wk. The rises of blood pressure (BP) and heart rate (HR) during ergometer exercise test were less under metoprolol than under nifedipine. Both nifedipine and metoprolol lowered the 24-h BP during ambulatory monitoring (P< 0. 05), but metoprolol induced a more stable reduction of BP and HR in whole day. Metoprolol lowered diastolic pressure and HR (P<0. 05). There were lower incidences of adverse effects in metoprolol group than nifedipine group. It is suggested that metoprolol is superior to nifedipine.
出处 《新药与临床》 CSCD 北大核心 1993年第4期234-236,共3页
关键词 美托洛尔 硝苯地平 高血压 药理学 metoprolol nifedipine exercise test delayed-action preparations blood pressure monitors
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献1

  • 1张维忠,龚兰生.高血压性心肌肥厚逆转的研究进展[J]中国循环杂志,1987(04).

共引文献4

同被引文献3

  • 1赵光胜 余振球 等.遗传与高血压.《实用高血压学》[M].北京:科学出版社,1993.129-151.
  • 2Gong Ls,Relationship between Left ventricular end-diastolic compliance and abnormal Doppler mitral filling in patients with coronary artery disease[J].Chin-Med-J-Engl,1991,Nov;104(11):909~13.
  • 3黄见亭.美托洛尔在慢性严重心力衰竭中的应用[J].中华心血管病杂志,1992,20(3):152-153. 被引量:32

引证文献2

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部