期刊文献+

绿豆抗豆象育种后代F2群体遗传变异分析 被引量:13

Genetic Analysis on Mungbean Breeding F 2 Population for Resistance to Bruchid
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 选用抗豆象品种 (系 )VC6 0 89A 6、VC1973A×V2 70 9 2、V2 80 2 ,与农艺性状优良的推广品种中绿 1号 (VC1973A)和中绿 2号 (VC2 917A系选 )作亲本 ,按照完全双列杂交试验设计 ,配置杂交组合。对 2 0个杂交组合后代F2 群体主要农艺性状及抗虫性分析 ,发现株高和抗虫性有超亲遗传现象 ,杂交优势明显 ;单株荚数普遍低于亲本 ,而单荚粒数略高于亲本 ,百粒重与亲本之间差异不明显。抗虫基因有抗性累加效应 ,3份抗虫材料的抗虫基因可能不在同一位点上。单株荚数是产量构成的主要因素 ,且遗传变异程度大与抗虫性相关性不紧密 ,在后代选择时 ,应以单株荚数为主攻目标 ,其次是株高、荚粒数、百粒重和抗虫性。初步认为从P1×P4、P1×P5、P2 ×P4、P4×P2 、P2 ×P5、P5×P2 和P5×P3 组合后代中选择效果明显。 Five varieties, 3 bruchid resistant VC6089A-6、VC1973A/V2709-2 and V2802,and 2 bruchid susceptible popular varieties Zhong lv No.1 (VC1973A)and Zhong lv No.2(VC2917A selection)for parents, by using 5×5 complete diallel crossing. The major agronomical characters and against the pests of 20 cross combination F 2 population were evaluated. The results showed that plant height and bruchid resistant have the transgressive inheritance phenomenon and hybrid vigor predominance. In general, the pods per plant were below the parents, the seeds per pod were more than the parents, the 100-seeds weight were not clear difference with the parents. It was found that the bruchid resistance was additive genetic and not same locus in 3 resistance accessions. The pod per plant was the factor for the yield composition and more genetic variation and not compact correlation. Therefore, the pods per plant should be considered first and then the plant height, seeds per pod, 100-seed weight, and bruchid resistance in the cross posterity selection. Preliminary, we think that is good cross combination of P 1×P 4、P 1×P 5、P 2×P 4、P 4×P 2、P 2×P 5、P 5×P 2 and P 5×P 3 for the mungbean bruchid resistance breeding.
出处 《植物遗传资源学报》 CAS CSCD 2004年第4期364-368,共5页 Journal of Plant Genetic Resources
基金 国家自然科学基金项目 (3 0 170 63 5 )资助
关键词 单株荚数 豆象 抗虫性 后代 亲本 遗传变异 百粒重 F2群体 遗传现象 选择效果 Mungbean Bruchid resistance Cross generation Genetic analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1[2]Taleker N S Biology. Damage and control of pests of mu ngbean. In: Mungbean: Proc. 2nd AVRDC. Tainan, Taiwan, China, 1988, 329~3 42
  • 2[4]Gujar G T, T D Yadav. Feeding of Callobruchus macula tus (Fab.) and Callosobruchs chinensis (Linn). In green gram. Indian J Ent omol,1978,40: 108~112
  • 3[5]Yang C Y. AVRDC mungbean research. In: P. Sinives, etc . Edit. Mungbean germplasm: collection, evaluation and utilization for breeding program-proc. Workshop on Mungbean Germplasm (Thailand, Aug. 17, 1995), 1996,8 4~88
  • 4程须珍,王素华,金达生,杨又迪,吴绍宇,周吉红.绿豆抗豆象遗传的初步研究[J].植物遗传资源科学,2001,2(4):12-15. 被引量:7
  • 5程须珍,王素华,金达生,王泮龙,杨又迪.绿豆抗豆象育种品系综合评价[J].植物遗传资源学报,2003,4(2):110-113. 被引量:17
  • 6周吉红,吴绍宇,程须珍,王素华,Srinives P..绿豆抗豆象品系及回交亲本抗性鉴定[J].植物遗传资源科学,2002,3(4):20-22. 被引量:2
  • 7[11]Cheng X Z, Srinives P and Yang C Y. Preliminary identificatio n of mungbean breeding accessions for resistance to bruchids (Callosobruchus c hinensis and C. maculatus) using RAPD markers. Thai J Agric Sci, 1996, 29: 449~457
  • 8[12]Tomooka N, Lairungreang C, etc. Development of bruchid-resist ance mungbean line using wild mungbean germplasm in Thailand. Plant Breeding,19 91,109:60~66
  • 9[13]Srinives P. Mungbean breeding: Past, present and future. In: P Sinives, etc. Edit. Mungbean germplasm: collection, evaluation and utilization for breeding program-proc. Workshop on Mungbean Germplasm. (Thailand, Aug. 17, 1995), 1996,73~83
  • 10[15]Srinives P. Mungbean breeding Research at ARC-AVRDC/KU. In: CHENG Xu-zhen, etc. Edit. Industrial development and technology utilization of mungbean in China. 2002,81~89

二级参考文献17

  • 1程须珍 童玉娥 等主编.中国绿豆产业发展与科技应用[M].北京:中国农业科技出版社,2002..
  • 2程须珍 杨又迪.绿豆抗豆象新品种选育[A]..中国绿豆科技应用论文集[C].北京:中国农业出版社,1999.56~60.
  • 3刘旭明 金达生 程须珍 等.绿豆种质资源抗豆象鉴定研究初报[A]..中国绿豆科技应用论文集[C].北京:中国农业出版社,1999.12~15.
  • 4Srinives P, C Y Yang. Mungbean production in Asia. The study and application of AVRDC mungbean in China. China Agriculture Press, 1993, 67--71.
  • 5Taleker N S. Biology, damage and control of pests of mungbean. In: Mungbean: Proc. 2^nd AVRDC. Shanhua, Tainan,Taiwan, China. 1988, 329--342.
  • 6Gujar G T, T D Yadav. Feeding of Callobruchus maculatus(Fab.) and Callosobruchs chinensis (Linn). In green gram. Indian J. Entomol, 1978, 40:108--112.
  • 7Fujii K, M Imoto and K Kitamura. Patterns of resistance to bean weevils (Bruchidae) in Vigna radiate-mungo-sublobata complex inform the breeding of new resistant varities, Appl.Ent. Zool, 1989,24(1): 126--132.
  • 8Yang C Y. AVRDC mungbean research. In: P. Sinives, et al.Edit. Mungbean Germplasm: Collection, Evaluation and Utilization for Breeding Program-Proc. Workshop on Mungbean Germplasm, (Thailand, Aug. 17, 1995). 1996,84-88.
  • 9Cheng X Z, Srinives P and Yang C Y. Preliminary identification of mungbean breeding accessions for resistance to Bruchids ( Callosobruchus chinensis and C. Maculatus ) using RAPD markers.Thai J. Agric. Sci, 1996,29:449--457.
  • 10Tomooka N, et al. Development of bruchid-resistance mungbean line using wild mungbean germplasm in Thailand. Plant Breeding, 1991,109: 60-- 66.

共引文献19

同被引文献201

引证文献13

二级引证文献76

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部