期刊文献+

影响系统评价质量的主要因素浅析 被引量:50

Some Risks of Affecting the Quality of Published Systematic Reviews in China
暂未订购
导出
摘要 本文通过总结在系统评价教学和已发表的系统评价中出现较多的问题,如系统评价与Meta分析的关系、Meta分析的应用条件和异质性分析、随机分配和分配隐藏、纳入标准和排除标准的关系与设立等进行了辨误,并对它们的基本概念加以阐释,以达到帮助提高我国系统评价质量的目的。 Some risks affecting the quality of published systematic reviews and in our teaching practice were listed and compared with the correct concept. The current problems include misunderstanding of the relationship of meta analysis and systematic review, applying meta analysis and assessing heterogeneity, randomization, allocate concealment, and how to make inclusion and exclusion criteria, etc. This paper aims to help Chinese reviewers improve the quality of their systematic reviews.
出处 《中国循证医学杂志》 CSCD 2005年第1期51-58,共8页 Chinese Journal of Evidence-based Medicine
关键词 系统评价 META分析 临床异质性 统计学异质性 Systematic review Meta-analysis Clinical heterogeneity Statistical heterogeneity
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献27

  • 1Clarke M, Oxman AD, editors. Cochrane Reviewers' Handbook 4.1.6 [ updated January 2003 ] [ EB/OL]. In: The Cochrane Library, Issue 1, 2003. Oxford: Update Software. Updated quarterly. URL: http://www. cochrane. dk/ cochrane/handbook. btm
  • 2Australian Cochrane Center. The Cochrane Handbook Summary Points & Libraries of Examples, September[ M ]. 1998.218
  • 3Austrahan Cochrane Center. The Cochrane Handbook Summary Points & Libraries of Examples, September [ M ]. 1998.213-217
  • 4Cochrane Collaboration open learning material for reviewers [M].Version 1.1, 2002 Nov.
  • 5Liu GJ. Correct Choose of Statistics Methods in Chnical Research[ A]. In: Wang jialiang, Clinical Epidemiology, 2nd edition. In: Shanghai. Shanghai Science and Technology Pubiishing company, 2001. 187-194刘关键.临床科研
  • 6Stroup DF, Thacker SB, Olson CM, Glass RM. Characteristics of Meta-analysis submitted to a medical journal [ A].From: International Congress on Biomedical Peer Review and Global Communications [ M ]; Prague: Czech Republic,1997. 17-21
  • 7Donna F. Stroup, Jesse A. Berlin, Sally C. Morton, Ingram Olkin, G. David Williamson, Drummond Rennie, David Moher, Betsy J. Becker, Theresa Ann Sipe, Stephen B.Thacker: Meta-analysis of observational studies in Epidemiology[J]. JAMA, 2000; 283(15) :2 008
  • 8Greenland S. Quantitative methods in the review of epidemiology literature[J]. Epidem Rev ,1987; 9:1 -30
  • 9Ollsson H. Oral contraceptives and breast cancer. A review[J]. Acta Oncol ,1989; 28(6):849-863
  • 10Blettner M, Sauerbrei W, Schlehofer B, Scheuchenpflug T,Friedenreich C. Traditional reviews, Meta-analysis and pooled analyses in epiderniology[J]. International Epidemiologycal Association, 1999; 28 ( 1 ): 1 - 9

共引文献148

同被引文献909

引证文献50

二级引证文献878

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部