期刊文献+

定量脑电图动态评估急性重型脑损伤患者脑功能及其预后的价值 被引量:2

Value of quantitative electroencephalogram in evaluating brain function and prognosis of patients with acute severe brain injury
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的:探讨重型脑损伤患者急性期定量脑电图的变化与预后的关系。方法:选用数字化脑电监测系统,对120例重庆医科大学附属第一医院神经外科2002-01/2003-04收治急性重型脑伤损患者(格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分≤8分)于伤后行床旁脑电图监测,平均监测时间为5d,比较急性重型脑损伤患者脑电功率值变化与患者预后的关系。结果:①重型脑损伤患者初次脑电图分级Ⅱ,Ⅲ,Ⅳ,Ⅴ级生存率分别为69%,70%,8%,0%;病死率分别为31%,30%,92%,100%。②死亡患者急性期脑电图总的绝对功率下降明显,伤后24h明显低于生存组;相对功率值中,慢波频段的显著下降及β频段相对功率值的异常增高提示预后极差。结论:重型脑伤急性期定量脑电图变化对判断脑功能及预后有重要的价值。 AIM: To study the relation between the changes of quantitative electroencephalogram(EEG) and the prognosis in patients with acute severe brain injury. METHODS:Between January 2002 and April 2003, 120 cases of acute severe brain injury (Glasgow Coma Scale GCS≤8) hospitalized in the Department of Neurosurgery, First Affiliated Hospital, Chongqing Universtiy of Medical Sciences were monitored with digital EEG for an average of 5 days post injury. The average duration for monitoring was 5 days. The results of EEG power spectrum and patient outcomes were compared. RESULTS: ①Initial EEG grade of patients with acute severe head injury showed that survival rate of Ⅱ, Ⅲ, Ⅳ, Ⅴwas respectively 69%, 70%, 8%, 0%and death rate was respectively 31%, 30%, 92%, 100%. ②The total absolute power of the death patients at acute period decreased significantly, significantly lower than that of the survival patients 24 hours after injury. The significant decrease of relative power of slow band and abnormal increase of β band showed worse prognosis. CONCLUSION: Quantitative EEG is a important parameter to evaluate the brain function and prognosis of patients with acute severe head injury.
出处 《中国临床康复》 CSCD 2004年第34期7644-7645,共2页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Rehabilitation
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

  • 1Bricolo A, Turazzi S, Faccioli F. Combined clinical and EEG examinations for assessment of severity of acute head injuries. Acta Neurochir 1979; 28:35 -9
  • 2Yang BJ, Zhao DL, Li SC, et al. Elevation of the prognosis of acute comatose patients by evoked potentials. Fudan Daxue Xuebao( Yixuebu)2001; 28:216 -8
  • 3Rae-Grant A, Eckert N, Barbour PJ, et al. Outcom of severe brain injury: a multimodality neurophysiological study. J Trauma 1996; 40:401 - 07

同被引文献29

  • 1王晓梅,宿英英.重症脑功能损伤的脑电图分级标准研究[J].中华神经科杂志,2005,38(2):104-107. 被引量:39
  • 2Thornton K E, Carmody D P. Traumatic brain injury rehabilitation : QEEG biofeedback treatment protocols [ J ]. Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback, 2009,34( 1 ) : 59-68.
  • 3Arciniegas D B. Clinical electrophysiologic assessments an mild traumatic brain injury: state-of-the-science and implica1 tions for clinical practice [J]. Int J Psychophysiol, 2011,89 (1):41-52. |.
  • 4Gilbert T T, Wagner M R, Halukurike V, et al. Use of bis- pectral electroencephalogram monitoring to assess neurologic status in unsedated, critically ill patients [J]. Crit Care Med, 2001,29(10) : 1996-2000.
  • 5Alster J, Pratt H, Feinsod M. Density spectral array, evoked potentials, and temperature rhythms in the evaluation and prognosis of the comatose patient [J]. Brain Inj, 1993,7(3): 191-208.
  • 6Leon-Carrion J, Martin-Rodriguez J F, Damas-Lopez J, et al. Brain function in the minimally conscious state: a quantitative neurophysiological study [ J ]. Clin Neurophysiol, 2008,119 (7) : 1506-1514.
  • 7Thatcher R W, Walker R A, Gerson I, et al. EEG discrimi- nant analyses of mild head trauma [J]. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol, 1989,73(2) : 94-106.
  • 8Stevens RD, Sutter R. Prognosis in severe brain injury [ J ]. Crit Care Med ,2013,41 : 1104.
  • 9Wijdicks EF, Hijdra A, Young GB,et al. Practice parameter : prediction of outcome in comatose survivors after cardiopulmonary resuscitation ( an evidence-based review) [ J]. Neurology,2006,67:203.
  • 10Kennedy JD, Gerard EE. Continuous EEG monitoring in the intensive care unit [ J ] Curt Neurol Neurosci Rep,2012,12:419.

引证文献2

二级引证文献21

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部