摘要
对 CBM、《中国期刊全文数据库》和《中文科技期刊数据库》三种期刊数据库收录医学文献的包含关系进行了 9年小样本多学科主题抽样的对比研究 ,结果显示 ,CBM的收录范围和覆盖面更大一些 ,《中国期刊全文数据库》和《中文科技期刊数据库》各有优势和特点。
The paper compares and studies the containment relation of 9 years' medicine literature coverage of CBM, Chinese journal full-text database and Chinese science & technology journal database by samples, the result shows that the medicine literature coverage of CBM is larger, two others have their onw advantages and characteristics.
关键词
CBM
中文期刊全文数据库
医学文献
中文科技期刊数据库
CBM
Chinese journal full-text database
CNKI
Chinese science & technology journal database
VIP
containment relation
