摘要
经比较 ,里耶秦简和张家山汉简县之“守”、“丞”、“守丞”的职权范围和职责内容不同 ;查历史文献有关记载与里耶秦简所记官制实际大相径庭 ;从里耶秦简本身文例分析 :县之“守、丞、守丞”互见、无别。基于以上分析 ,可以认定 :1.里耶秦简县之“守”、“丞”、“守丞”涵义相同 ,意指“长官” ;2 .秦时县一级的长官“守”、“丞”或“守丞”即行“县令、长”之实 ,却无“县令、长”之名。
The Shou, Cheng and Shoucheng of the county level recorded in Liye Qinjian and Zhangjiashan Hanjian were found to have different powers and reponsibilities through comparison. However, the relevent literature in the history and Liye Qinjian offer different discriptions of the system of officials. Through the analysis of the texts in Liye Qinjian, there are no difference among the Shou, Cheng and Shoucheng of the county level. Based on the analysis above the article holds that 1. the Shou, Cheng and Shoucheng recorded in Liye Qinjian have the same meaning, that is, chief. 2. the Shou, Cheng and Shoucheng of the county level during Qin dynasty shoulder the responsibility of Xianling and Zhang, without the corresponding titles.
出处
《北方论丛》
2004年第6期11-14,共4页
The Northern Forum
关键词
里耶秦简
守
丞
守丞
长官
Liye Qinjian
Shou
Cheng
Shoucheng
chief
