摘要
胡宏是性本论者,也是性善论者。但历来讨论胡宏,都没有对他论性的层次予以相应的说明,以致于误将胡宏当成了"心性本体论者"和"性无善恶论者"。倘若对胡宏论性的层次和特点进行历史的客观分析,胡宏作为"性本论者"和"性善论者"的历史本来面目就会被重新揭示。
Huhong takes Xing as the Reality,and deems that Xing is good.However,the former's studies about Huhong have not given a corresponding account of his theory on the levels and characteristics of Xing, so that Huhong was mistaken as one of the scholars who advocate Xing is neither good nor evil or obscurely called he thought Xing and Xing are all the Reality.Supposing historical and objective analysis on the levels and characteristics of Xing is taken,it will be recovered that Huhong indeed takes Xing as the Reality,and deems that Xing is good.
出处
《湘潭大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》
2004年第5期40-44,共5页
Journal of Xiangtan University:Philosophy And Social Sciences
关键词
胡宏
超越之性
自然之性
经验之性
Huhong
transcendental Xing
natural Xing
experiential Xing
