期刊文献+

生花植物概念简介及其名称的商榷 被引量:1

A Brief Introduction to Anthophyte Concept and Discussion on Its Name
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 在上个世纪最后的 2 0年里 ,系统学家应用形态性状对种子植物进行了大量的分支分析。其结果显示灭绝的五柱木属加上灭绝的本内苏铁目及尚存的买麻藤目是被子植物的姊妹群 ,形成一个强支 ,称之为生花植物支。生花植物假说对探讨被子植物起源有着重要影响 ,它激发人们讨论被子植物起源时间可能要提前到三叠纪甚至石炭纪 ,除了支持原有的真花学说外 ,还提出新恩格勒学说。但是 ,近年来对现存种子植物进行分子系统学研究的结果是 :(1)拒绝接受生花植物概念 ;(2 )买麻藤目并不是被子植物的姊妹群而是松柏目的姊妹群 ,甚至网结于松柏类而成为松科的姊妹群。这些结果并不使人惊讶 ,因为对探讨像包含许多灭绝类群的种子植物系统 ,决不可能是仅仅单独应用现代类群资料所能完成的。假如生花植物支是成立的 ,但其名称以AGPB支代替生花植物支可能较为合理。 In the last 2 decades of 20^(th) century,a great number of cladistic studies of seed plants using morphological characters have been carried out.The results show that extinct Pentoxylon plus extinct Bennettiales and extant Gnetales is the sister group of angiosperms,and they form a robust clade termed anthophyte clade.The anthophyte hypothesis has played a significant role on the investigation of the origin of angiosperms.It stimulates the discussion on the time of the origin of angiosperms which dated back as early as the Triassic or even the Carboniferous.The hypothesis proposes the Neo-Englerian theory except supporting previous Euanthial theory for the origin of angiosperms. However many recent outcomes of molecular phylogenetic studies of extant seed plants are:(1)refutation of anthophyte concept;(2)Gnetales not as the sister group of angiosperms but as the sister group of conifers or even nested within in conifers and then the sister group to Pinaceae.These results are certainly not surprising,because the phylogeny cannot be discerned with extant taxa alone for such seed plants consisting of many extinct taxa.The anthophyte may be a valid clade but its name is inappropriate.In substitution of the name of AGPB clade (acronym of Angiospermae,Gnetales,Pentoxylon and Bennettiales) for anthophyte clade may be reasonable.
出处 《云南植物研究》 CSCD 北大核心 2004年第5期475-481,共7页 Acta Botanica Yunnanica
基金 国家自然科学基金重点项目 (30 130 0 30 )资助
关键词 种子植物 被子植物 生花植物 新恩格勒学说 买麻藤目 Seed plants Angiosperms Anthophyte Neo-Englerian theory
  • 相关文献

参考文献27

  • 1Aber EAN,Parkin J,1907.On the origin of angiosperms[J].J Linn Soc Bot,38:29-80
  • 2Aber EAN,Parkin J,1908.Studies on the evolution of angiosperms.The relationship of the angiosperms to the Gnetales[J].Ann Bot (London),22:489-515
  • 3Axsmith BJ,Taylor EL,Taylor TN,1998.The limitation of molecular systematics:a palaeobotanical perspective[J].Taxon,47:105-108
  • 4Bessey CE,1915.The phylogenetic taxonomy of flowering plants[J].Ann Missouri Bot Gard,2:109-164
  • 5Chaw SM,Parkinson CL,Cheng Y,et al,2000.Seed plant phylogeny from all three plant genomes:monophyly of extant gymnosperms and origin of Gentales from conifers[J].Proc Natl Acad Sci USA,97:4086-4091
  • 6Chaw SM,Zharkikh A,Sung HM,et al,1997.Molecular phylogeny of extant gymnosperms and seed plant evolution:analysis of nuclear 18S rRNA sequences[J].Mol Biol Evol,14:56-68
  • 7Crane PR,1985.Phylogenetic analysis of seed plants and the origin of angiosperms[J].Ann Missouri Bot Gard,72:716-793
  • 8Crane PR,1993.Time for the angiosperms[J].Nature,366:631-632
  • 9Crane PR,Friis EM,Pedersen KR,1995.The origin and early diversification of angiosperms[J].Nature,374:27-33
  • 10Donoghue MJ,Doyle JA,2000.Seed plant phylogeny:demise of the anthophyte hypothesis?[J].Current Biology,10:R106-R109

同被引文献8

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部