摘要
确定争点与固定证据是审前准备程序的基本内容 ,二者处于诉讼进程的同一阶段 ,但具有不同的任务 ,在功能和时序上存在逻辑上的先后关系 ,从立法来看 ,目前急需设置和完善整理固定争点的程序 ,为固定证据提供前提。审前准备程序中应当建立预审制 ,实行准备法官与庭审法官的分离或相对分离 ,并采举证时效制 ,审前准备程序并非所有案件的必经程序。审前准备程序中应当充分发挥当事人的作用 ,采当事人主义 ,法官实施程序管理并通过行使释明权对当事人进行适当的协助。应当建立审前调解制度 ,破除查明事实、分清是非的理念 。
The basic subject of the pretrial preliminary procedure is to decide the controversial points and to fix evidence. The two are in the same stage of proceedings, but have different tasks. As to their functions and order, they are logically in priority order. Legislatively, the procedure to fix controversial points needs to be established and arranged urgently to provide the condition for fixing evidence at present. In the pretrial preliminary procedure, the preliminary hearing system should be established, separation of preliminary judges and trial judges should be made, and the system of limitation for adducing evidence shall be adopted. The pretrial preliminary procedure is not the necessary procedure for all cases. In the pretrial preliminary procedure, the parties' role should be brought into full play, and adversary system be taken, in which judges perform procedural control and give some assistance to the parties through exercising their power of interpretation. The pretrial mediating system should be adopted to do away with the concept of finding out the truth and distinguishing between right and wrong. The pretrial mediation should be strengthened on the basis of it.
出处
《政法论坛》
CSSCI
北大核心
2004年第4期10-15,共6页
Tribune of Political Science and Law
关键词
审前准备程序
固定证据
民事诉讼
“明确争点”
Pretrial Preliminary Procedure
Clarifying Controversial Points
Fixing Evidence
