期刊文献+

APACHEⅡ系统在外科监护室的应用 被引量:1

Performance of APACHEⅡ Models in Surgical Intensive Care Unit
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的 评价急性生理学和慢性健康状况评估 (APACHE)Ⅱ评分系统在单中心外科监护室 3年的应用情况。方法 对本院外科监护室连续 3年符合标准的 831例患者 ,收集与APACHEⅡ评分系统相关的病例资料 ,计算预计死亡危险度 ,并与实际住院病死率比较 (标化死亡比 )。分辨度的评价应用四格分类表和受试者操作特性曲线 ;校准度的评价采用拟合优度检验和校准曲线 ;按年龄、入住类型、停留时间分层 ,评估模型的拟合一致性。结果 整体住院病死率为 2 0 .1% ,标化死亡比达 1.75 ,95 %可信区间为 1.5 0~ 2 .0 4。以 5 0 %预计死亡危险度为截断点 ,总体正确分类率达 81.7% ,ROC曲线下面积达 0 .878,提示模型分辨度良好 ;Hosmer Lemeshow拟合优度检验 (H2 =96 .7,P <0 .0 1)和校准曲线提示校准度较差。急诊术后和短期停留患者的分辨度和校准度都较满意。结论 APACHEⅡ评分系统并不完全适用于整个研究人群 ,临床应用应谨慎 ;同时应当改进和提高外科监护室的整体诊治水平。 Purpose To validate the severity scoring system of acute physiology and chronic health evalua tion (APACHEⅡ) in a single center surgical intensive care unit (SICU) population for three years. Methods Data were collected in SICU over 3 years on 831 consecutively qualified admitted patients regarding APACHEⅡ.Predicted hospital mortality and standardized mortality ratio was calculated.Discrimination was tested using classification matrices and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves;Calibration was tested using the Hosmer Lemeshow goodness of fit tests and calibration curves;The uniformity of fit was evaluated in age,type of admission and length of stay (LOS) subgroups. Results For the SICU population as a whole,the hospital mortality was 20.1%,and the risk adjusted standardized mortality ratio (SMR) was 1.75 (95% confidence intervals,1.50-2.04).The total correct classification rate was 81.7% at the predicted risk of 50% and the area under the ROC curve was 0.878 suggest a good discrimination of the model.The Hosmer Lemeshow goodness of fit tests ( H 2=96.7,P <0.01) and calibration curves showed a poor calibration.The discrimination and calibration were good in the subgroup patients of the postemergency surgery and the short LOS. Conclusions The severity scoring system of APACHEⅡdid not fit the study population as a whole,although it really fitted some subgroup patients.The clinical application of this model should be cautious.Meanwhile,we should further improve our performance of SICU.
出处 《复旦学报(医学版)》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2004年第4期417-420,共4页 Fudan University Journal of Medical Sciences
基金 上海市医学领先专业重点学科 (993 0 2 7)资助项目
关键词 APACHEⅡ系统 外科监护室 临床应用 危重病评分 acute physiology and chronic health evaluation Ⅱ surgical critical care severity of illness index
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Ridley S.Severity of illness scoring systems and performance appraisal.Anaesthesia,1998,53:1185
  • 2Rowan KM, Kerr JH, Major E,et al.Intensive care society's APACHEⅡ study in britain and ireland-Ⅱ:Outcome comparisons of intensive care units after adjustment for case mix by the american APACHEⅡ method.BMJ,1993,307:977
  • 3Oh TE,Hutchinson R,Short S,et al.Verification of the acute physiology and chronic health evaluation scoring system in a hong kong intensive care unit.Crit Care Med,1993,21:698
  • 4Markgraf R,Deutschinoff G,Pientka L,et al.Comparison of acute physiology and chronic health evaluations Ⅱ and Ⅲ and simplified acute physiology score Ⅱ:A prospective cohort study evaluating these methods to predict outcome in a german interdisciplinary
  • 5Moreno R,Morais P.Outcome prediction in intensive care:result of a prospective,multicentre,portuguese study.Intensive Care Med,1997,23:177
  • 6Castella X,Artigas,A,Bion J,et al.European/north american severity study group.A comparison of severity of illness scoring systems for intensive care unit patients:results of a multicenter multinational study.Crit Care Med,1995,23:1327
  • 7Capuzzo M,Valpondi V,Sgarbi A,et al.Validation of severity scoring systems SAPⅡ and APACHEⅡ in a single-center population.Intensive Care Med,2000,26:1779
  • 8Suistomaa M,Niskanen M,Kari A,et al.Customised prediction models based on APACHEⅡ and SAPⅡ scores in patients with prolonged length of stay in the ICU.Intensive Care Med,2002,28:479
  • 9杨径,孟新科,申群喜,邓跃林.APACHEⅢ、SAPSⅡ、MPMⅡ_0与APACHEⅡ在急诊内科危重病人病情评估中的比较[J].中国急救医学,2002,22(2):78-80. 被引量:40
  • 10游昕,朱家麟,郝家骅.急性生理与慢性健康评估Ⅱ评分系统在心胸外科监护病房的应用[J].中国胸心血管外科临床杂志,2000,7(1):15-17. 被引量:2

二级参考文献13

  • 1牛正翔,王爱琴,杨德同,刘少华,杨毅.40例急性出血坏死性胰腺炎患者APACHEⅡ评分的临床分析[J].中国危重病急救医学,1995,7(4):215-217. 被引量:2
  • 2沈文筠 韩家林.危重病监护手册,第1版[M].北京:人民军医出版社,1994.153-164.
  • 3Knaus WA, Draper EA, Wagner DP, etal.APACHE Ⅱ:a severity of disease classification system. Crit CareMed,1985,13(10):818-829.
  • 4Knaus WA, Zimmerman JE, Wagner DP, et al.APACHE-acute physiology and chronic healthevaluation:a physiologically based classification system. Crit Care Med,1981,9(8):591-597.
  • 5Knaus WA, Wagner DP, Draper EA, et al.The APACHE Ⅲ prognostic system:riskprediction of hospital mortality for critically ill hospitalized adults. Chest,1991,100(6):1619-1636.
  • 6Beck DH, Taylor BL, Millar B, et al.Prediction of outcome from intensive care:aprospective cohort study comparing Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation ⅡandⅢ prognostic system in a United Kingdom intensive care unit. Crit CareMed,1997,25(1):9-15.
  • 7Oh TE, Hutchinson R, Short S, et al.Verification of the acute physiology andchronic health evaluation scoring system in a Hong Kong intensive care unit. Crit CareMed,1993,21(5):698-705.
  • 8周立新,汤耀卿,尹浩然,张圣道.APACHE Ⅱ 评分及MPM对普外危重病监护的应用价值[J].中国普通外科杂志,1997,6(6):341-344. 被引量:6
  • 9钱礼.我对急性胰腺炎诊治的几点看法[J].中国实用外科杂志,2000,20(5):271-272. 被引量:46
  • 10张继红,古立诚,戴丽华,谭卫民,陈国忠,吴良平.重症急性胰腺炎的临床特点及治疗对策[J].中国普通外科杂志,2000,9(3):195-198. 被引量:17

共引文献58

同被引文献16

引证文献1

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部