期刊文献+

系统性红斑狼疮患者151例的生存质量及其影响因素 被引量:25

Quality of life of 151 patients with systemic lupus erythematosus
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的使用健康状况调查问卷简表-36(SF-36)量表评价系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)患者的生存质量(QOL)及其影响因素。方法选择不同病情的SLE患者151例进行SF-36量表调查问卷,分析量表各维度得分与疾病活动性指数(SLEDAI)、损伤指数(SLICC/ACRDI)、治疗方案等因素相关性。结果SLE患者SF-36量表各维度得分和健康变化自评(HT)低于中国常模,部分维度得分高于国外SLE患者;活动期、合并肾、脑内脏损伤的患者QOL得分低于非活动期、无肾脑损伤者。影响QOL最主要的因素是SLEDAI和DI记分并呈明显负相关;QOL还受激素使用剂量、年龄、病程、文化程度等因素的影响。结论SF-36量表适于评价SLE患者的QOL,患者的QOL受病情活动度、严重性及治疗方案的影响。 Objective To determine health related quality of life (QOL) of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and to identify the factors affecting QOL. Methods One hundred and fifty-one consecutive patients with SLE were separated into different groups according to the type or stage of disease. Health status were measured by 1 health transition (HT) and 8 composite scales of the medical outcomes study short form-36 (SF-36). The mean scores for each subscale of the SF-36 for patients with SLE in China were compared to those of a health population in China and of foreign SLE patients.The effect of patients′age,sex,education level,disease duration,disease activity (assessed by SLEDAI score),and organ damage(assessed by SLICC/ACR DI) and treatment were analyzed. ANOVA, rank sum test and correlation analysis were applied for statistical analysis. Results Patients with SLE had significantly lower HT and mean scores in each subscale of the SF-36 compared to those of a health population in China,while the scores in such subscales as physical functioning (PF), bodily pain (BP), vitality (VT), role-emotional (RE) and mental health (MH) were higher than those of foreign SLE patients. The mean scores of those patients with lupus nephritis and center neural lupus or in active state were lower than those not or those in steady-going. The SLEDAI score and SLICC/ACR DI were the most important elements that affected the QOL in SLE patients and showed obviously negative correlated with one′s scores in SF-36. The glucocorticoid dose of patients was closely negatively correlated with one′s scores. The latter were also associated with age, education level and disease duration. Conclusion The health status of patients with SLE is mainly associated with disease activity,damage and therapy. The SF-36 is a valid instrument for measuring the health related QOL in SLE.
出处 《中华风湿病学杂志》 CAS CSCD 2004年第7期420-423,共4页 Chinese Journal of Rheumatology
关键词 系统性红斑狼疮 生存质量 影响因素 调查 诊断 临床分期 Lupus erythematosus, systemic Medical outcomes study short form-36 Quality of life
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1李宁秀,刘朝杰,李俊,任晓晖.四川省城乡居民SF-36评价参考值[J].华西医科大学学报,2001,32(1):43-47. 被引量:397
  • 2Gladman DD,Urowitz MB,Ong A,et al.Lack of correlation among the 3 outcomes describing SLE: disease activity,damage and quality of life.Clin Exp Rheumatol,1996,14:305-308.
  • 3Nossent JC.SLICC/ACR damage index in Afro-Caribbean patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: changes in and relationship to disease activity,corticosteriod therapy and prognosis.J Rheumatol,1998,25:277-284.
  • 4Sutcliffe N,Clarke AE,Levinton C,et al.Associates of health status in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus,J Rheumatol,1999,26:2352-2356.
  • 5Thumboo J,Fong KY,Chan SP,et al.A prospective study of factors affecting quality of life in systemic lupus erythematosus.J Rheumatol,2000,27:1414-1420.
  • 6Wang CC,Mayo NE,Fortin PR.The relationship between health related quality of life and disease activity and damage in systemic lupus erythematosus.J Rheumatol,2001,28:525-532.
  • 7Thumboo J,Fong KY,Ng TP,et al.Validation of the MOS SF-36for quality of life assessment of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus in Singapore.J Rheumatol,1999,26:97-102.

二级参考文献4

共引文献396

同被引文献296

引证文献25

二级引证文献121

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部