期刊文献+

s/z比值在聋儿言语呼吸中的临床价值 被引量:12

The clinical value of s/z ration in the rehabilitation of the deaf children
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的 通过本实验证明s/z比值在聋儿言语呼吸中的临床应用价值。材料: 在上海市随机选取4-17岁640名健听儿童,从国内外数家康复中心随机选出共29名配戴助听器且采用腹式呼吸的聋儿接受s/z测试,以及30名接受胸式呼吸训练的配戴助听器聋儿。方法 采用“实时言语矫治仪”进行测试,令受试者先发/s/音,然后发/z/音,均符合最长声时的发音要求,然后求其比值。结果 s/z比值不受年龄、性别的影响,且聋儿组康复训练前后s/z比值有着显著性差异,胸式呼吸的s/z比远大于腹式呼吸组。结论 s/z比值能够进一步检测出聋儿言语呼吸不协调的问题,为制定康复方案提供了有价值的参考;同时证明胸式呼吸不仅使得聋儿的言语呼吸支持不足,而且造成呼吸和发音系统的严重不协调。 Objective: Testify the clinical value of s/z ratio in the rehabilitation for the deaf children. MaterialsRandomly selecting 840 normal children aged 4-17 in Shanghai, 29 deaf children with hearing aids who adapted theabdomen breathing,and 30 deaf children who adapted the thorax breathing in several rehabilitation centers. MethodsSuggest the subjects phonated the /s/, then phonate the /z/, the maxium time of phonation was tested with the 'RealAnalysis', and then computing the s/z. Results The normal s/z ratio was not influenced by the gender and age, andthe s/z values between the pre-and post-rehabilitation had significant difference. The s/z ratio of thorax breathingwas much longer than that of the abdomen breathing. Conclusions The s/z ratio can further diagnose the special speechrespiration disorders for the deaf children, and provide valuable reference to make decision for the rehabilitation plan.The thorax breathing aggravates the coordination of speech and respiration.'
作者 黄昭鸣 万萍
出处 《中国听力语言康复科学杂志》 2004年第4期20-22,共3页 Chinese Scientific Journal of Hearing and Speech Rehabilitation
关键词 s/z比值 聋儿康复 言语矫治 重读治疗 s/z ratio Aural rehabilitation Speech therapy Accent method
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献14

  • 1De Bodt M, Wuyts F, Van de Heyning P, et al. Test - retest study of the GRBAS scale : influence of experience and professional background on perceptual rating of voice quality[J]. J Voice, 1997, 11: 74.
  • 2Dejonckere PH, Obbens C, De Moor GM, et al. Perceptual evaluation of dysphonia : Reliability and relevance[J]. Folia Phoniatrica, 1993,45: 76.
  • 3Wuyts FL, De Bodt MS, Van de heyning PH. Is the reliability of a visual analog scale higher than an ordinal scale? An experiment with the GRBAS scale for the perceptual evaluation of dysphonia[J]. J Voice,1999, 13: 508.
  • 4Wolfe V, Fitch J, Martin D. Acoustic measures of dysphonic severity across and within voice types[J]. Folia Phoniatr Logop, 1997, 49:292.
  • 5Piccirillo J, Colin P, Dennis F. Assessment of two objective voice function indices[J]. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol, 1998, 107: 396.
  • 6Wuyts FL, De Bodt MS, Molenberghs G, et al. The dysphonia severity index : an objective measure of vocal quality based on a multiparameter approch[J]. J Speech Hear Res, 2000, 43: 796.
  • 7Eskenazi L, Childers DG, Hicks DM. Acoustic correlates of vocal quality[J]. J Speech Hear Res, 1991, 33: 298.
  • 8Yu P, Ouaknine M, Giovanni A. Intérêt clinique du calcul des coefficients de Lyapunov pour l' analyse objective des dysphonies[J]. Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol. 2000, 5: 301.
  • 9Hirano M. Psycho - acoustic evaluation of voice : GRBAS Scale for evaluating the hoarse voice. Clinical examination of voice[J]. Springer Verlag, Wien, 1981.
  • 10Giovanni A, Ouaknine M, Guelfucci B, et al. Non - linear behavior of vocal fold vibration : the role of coupling between the vocal folds[J]. J Voice, 1999, 13: 456.

共引文献47

同被引文献74

引证文献12

二级引证文献80

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部