摘要
本文将新中国美学研究称为现代美学,认为它基本上延续了西方主流美学的研究模式:即假设的概念,预设的体系和逻辑中心主义的论证方法。这里仅以美学大讨论中出现的四个流派为例,探讨一下被中国现代美学所忽视的主要问题。目前,在西方解构主义、后现代的冲击和中国古代理论资源的映衬下,它的主观臆测、脱离实际和自我封闭的缺陷充分暴露出来,主要表现为:研究方法的局限和对中国古代理论资源的忽视;对美学的生命原理的忽视;对审美双向性即主体间性的忽视;对美的存在形式多元性的忽视。也许,只有在重视中国古代美学和文论资源的现代意义基础上,中国的美学研究才能接上地气,获得新生。
The paper argues that aesthetic studies in new China belongs to modern aesthetics as it has followed the basic research modes of Western mainstream aesthetics that has involved conceptual hypothesis, presupposed system and logocentric argumentation. The paper takes for examples the debates between the four schools of aesthetics and examines some important issues overlooked in modern Chinese aesthetics. In the context of deconstructionism and postmodernism,against the background of the rich resources of Chinese classical theories,aesthetic studies in new China has gradually exhibited their overly subjective speculation,detachment from practice,and self-closure. These deficiencies show in following aspects: limitedness in research methodology,neglect to Chinese ancient critical resources,negligence of aesthetic principle of life,overlook of the duality of aesthetics or inter-subjectivity,and inattention to the formal diversity of aesthetic existence. The paper maintains that Chinese aesthetic studies may be rejuvenated only through putting sufficient attention to the significance of Chinese ancient aesthetics and critical resources.
出处
《文艺理论研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2015年第2期68-80,共13页
Theoretical Studies in Literature and Art
关键词
现代美学
中国古代美学资源
生命原理
美感的双向生成
多元性
modern aesthetics
Chinese ancient aesthetic resources
life principle
mutual generation of the aesthetic sense,diversity
