摘要
1914年的清室复辟案与1915年的袁世凯称帝案,作为袁世凯统治时代两次大规模的复辟运动。均为复辟图谋,又均由肃政厅对涉案人员刘廷琛、劳乃宣、宋育仁以及杨度等筹安会六君子进行弹劾,但是由于复辟支持对象的不同,前者以案件关系人宋育仁遣送回籍的结果告终,而后者尽管平政院院长周树模以及都肃政史庄蕴宽分别采取了"总统世袭"以及弹劾筹安会、称病辞职等政治策略,结果却是未能阻挡袁世凯称帝的步伐。这充分暴露出民初法律运行过程中政治因素所发挥的巨大作用。
The restoration of the Qing monarch in 1914 and the restoration of Yuan Shikai in 1915 are two large-scaled conspiracies of restoration in which persons involved in the cases like six men of Chou An Society were impeached. However, owing to different monarchs they supported in each case, the former restoration ended in repatriating Song Yuren to his hometown while in the latter case, Zhou Shumo and Zhuang Yunkuan failed to stop Yuan Shikai's enthronement despite their respective political strate-gies. This reveals a great role of political factors in legal enforcement in early years of the Republic of China.
出处
《江苏社会科学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2014年第6期234-244,共11页
Jiangsu Social Sciences
基金
孙宏云教授主持的"近代中国译政治学书目辑录与研究"
广东省哲学社会科学规划项目
2012-2015年
关键词
复辟
弹劾
筹安会
辞职
restoration
impeach
Chou An Society
resign
