摘要
目的:比较穴位刺血与中药内服治疗小儿风热型咳嗽的疗效差异。方法:将92例患儿随机分为刺血组和中药组,每组46例。刺血组:穴取①肺俞、大椎;②尺泽。两组穴位交替刺血,每日1次,4日为一疗程。中药组:口服小儿清热止咳合剂,3~15 mL/次,每日3次,4日为一疗程。1个疗程后比较两组疗效。结果:刺血组治愈率为76.1%(35/46)、有效率为97.8%(45/46),中药组分别为54.3%(25/46)、87.0%(40/46)),两组间差异均有统计学意义(均P【0.05)。结论:穴位刺血治疗小儿风热型咳嗽的疗效优于中药内服。
Objective To observe the clinical therapeutic effect of acupoints blood-letting for children wind-heat cough.Methods Ninety-two patients who met the diagnostic criteria were randomized into an acupoints blood-letting group and a Chinese medicine group,46 cases in each one.In the acupoints blood-letting group,blood-letting was applied at①Feishu(BL 13),Dazhui(GV 17);②Chize(LU 5).Two groups of points were used alternatively,once a day,4 days made one session.In the Chinese medicine group,children heat cough mixture was prescribed orally,3~15 mL each time and 3 times a day,4 days made one session.After one session of treatment,the clinical efficacy was compared between the two groups.Results The curative rate and the total effective rate were 76.1%(35/46),97.8%(45/46)in the acupoints blood-letting group,and 54.3%(25/46),87.0%(40/46))in the Chinese medicine group,respectively,there were significant differences between two groups(both P<0.05).Conclusion Points bloodletting therapy for children wind-heat cough is obviously better than traditional Chinese medicine,and is worthy of clinical application.
出处
《中国针灸》
CAS
CSCD
北大核心
2013年第S1期41-42,共2页
Chinese Acupuncture & Moxibustion
关键词
小儿咳嗽
风热型
刺血疗法
children cough
wind-heat type
blood-letting therapy
