期刊文献+

抑郁症患者的自动思维、功能失调性认知及应付方式的调查 被引量:4

Investigation of automatic thoughts,dysfunctional cognition and coping style in patients with depression
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的:探讨抑郁症患者的自动思维、功能失调性认知及应付方式,以及与抑郁严重程度的关系。方法:采用自评抑郁量表(SDS)、自动思维问卷(ATQ)、功能失调性状况评定量表(DAS)及应付方式问卷对60例抑郁症患者分别于治疗前及治疗6周末进行问卷调查,并将治疗前、后测评结果加以比较。结果:①治疗6周末,抑郁症患者的SDS及ATQ评分分别由治疗前的55.74±7.29,84.12±23.57下降至37.16±8.13,53.21±19.34治疗前后差异有显著性意义,(t=13.18,7.85,P均<0.01)。②功能失调性认知方面,除脆弱性、完美性和依赖性评分(治疗前分别为21.43±3.92,20.57±3.82,21.84±4.37),治疗6周末降为19.38±3.19,18.76±3.93,18.93±3.82)差别有非常显著性意义外(t=3.14,2.56,3.88,P<0.05~0.01),其他认知因子评分及总分差别均无显著性意义(t=1.70,1.86,1.83,1.03,1.07,P均>0.05);③应付方式方面,抑郁症患者的退避及自责评分分别由治疗前的0.49±0.23,0.53±0.27下降至0.38±0.21,0.39±0.26,而求助及解决问题评分分别由治疗前的0.37±0.22,0.47±0.29升高至0.48±0.24,0.63±0.33,差异有显著性意义(t=3.01,3.43,2.68,2.78,P均<0.01);但幻想及合理化评分则变化不明显(P>0.05)。结论:抑郁症患者的自动思维及应付方式随抑郁严重程度的变? AIM:To explore the characteristics of automatic thoughts,dysfunctional cognition and coping style in depressive patients,and their relations with the severity of depression. METHODS:Sixty patients with depression were assessed by self rating depression scale(SDS),automatic thoughts questionnaire(ATQ),dysfunctional attitudes scales(DAS) and coping style questionnaire before and after treatment,and the results were compared. RESULTS:①The scores of SDS and ATQ of the depressive patients reduced to 37.16±8.13 and 53.21±19.34 respectively after 6 week treatment,significantly different from those before treatment(55.74±7.29 and 84.12±23.57,t=13.18,7.45,P< 0.01).②In the aspect of dysfunctional cognition,the scores of frailty,consummation and dependence of the depressive patients before treatment were 21.43±3.92,20.57±3.82 and 21.84±4.37,respectively,and decreased to 19.38±3.19,18.76±3.93 and 18.93±3.82 after treatment,the differences were significant(t=3.14, 2.56,3.88,P< 0.05-0.01),while there were insignificant differences in the scores of other cognitive factors and total scores(t=1.70,1.86, 1.83,1.03,1.07,P >0.05).③In the aspect of coping style,the scores of avoidance and self blame of the depressive patients decreased to 0.38±0.21 and 0.39±0.26 from 0.49±0.23 and 0.53±0.27 before treatment, while the scores of asking for help and solving problems increased to 0.48±0.24 and 0.63±0.33 from 0.37±0.22 and 0.47±0.29 before treatment, the differences were significant(t=3.01,3.43,2.68,2.78,P< 0.01); and there were no obvious changes in the scores of fancy and rationalization (P >0.05). CONCLUSION:The automatic thoughts and coping style change with the severity of depression,and have the characteristic of state;while there is no obvious change of DAS with relative stability.
出处 《中国临床康复》 CSCD 2004年第18期3454-3455,共2页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Rehabilitation
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Beck AT. Cognitive therapy and emotional disorder. New York:International Universities Press 1985:10-30
  • 2Leucht S,Wada M,Kurz A. Are negative cognitions symptoms depression also an expression of personalitytraits?Nervenarzt 1997;68(7):563-8
  • 3Austrn MP Mitchell P, Goodwin GM. Cognitive deficits in depression:possible implication s for functional neuropathology. Br J Psychiatry 2001;178(3):200-6
  • 4Ravindran AV, Griffiths J, Waddell C, et al. Stressful life events and coping styles in relation to dysthymia and major depressive disorder: Variations associated with alleviation of symptoms following pharmacotherapy. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psych
  • 5郭克锋,王秉康,贾俊平,杨文清,朱银星,关菊香.抑郁症患者的心理防御方式[J].中国临床康复,2002,6(23):3488-3489. 被引量:13
  • 6舒良 汪向东 王希林 马弘.自评抑郁量表(SDS)[A].汪向东,王希林,马弘.心理卫生评定量表手册(增订版)[M].北京:中国心理卫生杂志社,1999.194-6.
  • 7刘平 汪向东 王希林 马弘.自动思维问卷(ATQ)[A].汪向东,王希林,马弘.心理卫生评定量表手册(增订版)[M].北京:中国心理卫生杂志社,1999.215-7.
  • 8陈远岭,徐俊冕,严善明,冼易平,李一云,常晓棠,梁国祥,马振祥.功能失调性状况评定量表信度和效度初步研究[J].中国心理卫生杂志,1998,12(5):265-267. 被引量:64
  • 9肖计划 汪向东 王希林 马弘.应付方式问卷[A].汪向东,王希林,马弘.心理卫生评定量表手册(增订版)[M].北京:中国心理卫生杂志社,1999.109-15.
  • 10魏立莹,赵介城.抑郁症患者认知方式与人格类型[J].中国临床康复,2003,7(15):2196-2197. 被引量:13

二级参考文献17

  • 1汪向东 等.心理卫生评定量表手册(增订版)[M].中国心理卫生杂志社,1999,12..
  • 2纪术茂.明尼苏达多相人格调查表:(MMPI-B成套量表)解释手册[M].西安:陕西科学技术出版社,1998.20-254.
  • 3Zhang HC, Meng QM, Zheng RC. Studies on cognitive styles.Acta Psychologica Sinica 1981; (3):299- 304.
  • 4Zhang HC, Zheng RC, Meng QM. Studies on cognitive styles. Psychological Science 1982; (2):12 -6.
  • 5Zahng WD. Analysis about on cognitive styles for student. Psychological Science1995:18(1):29 -33.
  • 6Hou GL, Zhang ZL, Wu XS, Shen LY. Study on cognitive styles for sex-difference.Psychological Science 1997; (4) :367 - 8.
  • 7Zhang CX.Modern Psychology.Shanghai:Shanghai People Press 1994.128-9.
  • 8Yang XH. Application of Psycho-techniques. Nanjing: Hehai University Press2002:278 - 86.
  • 9Yang B, Huang XT. The concept and measure of two prototypes for depression:sociotopy-dependency and autonomy-self-criticism. China's Clinical Psychology 1997;(3)186 -9.
  • 10Guo LP. Study on cognitive characteristic for depressive studeats. Psychological Science 1999:(2):171-3.

共引文献142

同被引文献45

引证文献4

二级引证文献51

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部