期刊文献+

试论表见证明的基本属性与应用功能之界定 被引量:18

Primary Discussion on Determination of Basic Attributes and Practical Function of Prima facie Beweis .
原文传递
导出
摘要 在诉讼上,作为一种证明手段,在一定条件下,表见证明的运用始终发挥着独特而不可替代的功能。但是,在实务上,目前表见证明的应用遇到很大的困惑和障碍,究其原因,关键在于,理论上对于表见证明的研究缺乏明确的界定,或者说,虽然有界定,但是,在破解实务上的疑难问题时,涉及的相关概念、范畴与功能有待于进一步明晰。本文试图从表见证明的理论、实务等方面,对其基本属性、有关的争议焦点及应用功能进行论证并取得相应的结论。 During a litigation, as a method of proof and in a certain condition, the application of Prima facie Beweis plays an absolutely irreplaceable role. However, at present, the application of Prima facie Beweis meets up with great difficulties and obstacles in practice. The definite cause is not but the lack of a clear determination on research about Prima facie Beweis, or by other words, even if the determination is in place, but in resolving difficult problem concerning conception, category and function, a deeper definition is still needed. From the perspective of basic conception, relative issues and practical function, this article is aimed to deal with the theoretical and practical problems of Prima facie Beweis, and finally comes with certain conclusions.
作者 毕玉谦
机构地区 国家法官学院
出处 《证据科学》 2007年第5期97-112,共16页 Evidence Science
关键词 表见证明 基本属性 应用功能 界定 Prima facie Beweis, Basic attributes, Practical function, Determination
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1[10]George H.Kendal,Facts,Butterworths.p.18.
  • 2[12]Wassermeryer,S.2ff.; 30; Diederichen,VersR 1966,214f.; Wassermeryer,ZZP 81,64,69; Ekel?f,ZZP 75,300; L?deritz,46.DJT,Teil 2 E,S.85; Michael,Verteilung,S.140,142f.; ArbG Gelsenkirchen,BB 1979,939.,第142页.
  • 3[15]Rosenberg-Schwab,ZPR,13.Aufl.,§ 114 Ⅱ 1 ;Stein-Jones-Schumann-Leipold,ZPO,19.Aufl.,§ 282 Anm.Ⅳ 7a;Baumbach-Lauterbach-Hartmann,41.Aufl.,§286,Anhang 3 B ;MünchKomm-Grunsky,BGB,2.Bd.,vor 249 Rdnr.139; Hainmüller,同处,S.33ff.; Kollhosser,AcP 165,46 ff,; Gottwald,Schadenszurechnung,S.202.转引自前引2《现代证明责任问题》,第142页.
  • 4[17]Kollhosser,AcP 165,55ff.; Kollhosser,AcP 167,451; Greger,Beweis,S.172,178; Diederichsen,ZZP 81,49.
  • 5[18]Musielak,Die Grungdfragen der Beweislast im Zivilprozeβ(1975),S.120 ff.:Musielak-Stadler,Grundfragen des Beweisrechts (1984),Rdnr.159ff.; Gerhard Walter,Frei Beweiswürdigung (1979),S.156.183f.,ders.,Der Anwendungsbereich des Anscheinsbeweises,ZZp 90,238; Bernhard M.Maassen,Beweismaβ,probleme im Schadensersatzprozeβ (1975),S.66; Rolf Bender,Das Beweismaβ Festschrift für Baur (1981),S.259 ff; Wolfgang Brehm,Die Bindung des Richters an den Partervortrag und Grenzen freier Verhandlungswürdigung(1981),S.186.188.前引11吴杰文,第279页.
  • 6[25]Peter Gottwald,Schadenszurechnung und Schadenssch?tzung (1979),S.201ff.,ders.,Sonderregeln der Beweislastverteiliung,Jura 1980,303ff.转引自前引11,吴杰文,第275页.
  • 7[26]BGHZ 24,308.
  • 8[27]BGH,VersR 1968,241.
  • 9[32]Harald Koch,Frank Diedrich,Civil Procedure in Germany,Kluwer Law International,1998.p.170.
  • 10[35]C.J.Carr and S.J.Beaumont,Swot Law of Evidence,Blackstone Press Limited,1992.p.56.

同被引文献156

引证文献18

二级引证文献70

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部