摘要
试图论述产权制度安排中应该坚持最优效率原则,通过对"躲避突然而来的暴风而紧急使用码头并没有侵犯任何权利"等事例的分析,指出科斯的效率原则不是帕累托效率的改进;诺思的效率原则只适应常态,非常态下紧急使用资源的权利应界定给道德;完整私有产权的效率原则是错误的。应该坚持的效率原则是将产权客体(或客体的某一权利属性)界定给通过控制属性能更容易地影响产出净价值的一方,或者把承担风险的责任付给最有能力承担责任的一方。
The paper tries to expound the efficiency principle in the process of assignment of property rights. After discussing the example of 'instantly using the dock to avoid the unwanted storm which assaults nobody's rights',the paper points out that Coase's efficient principle is not the improvement of Pareto' efficiency and North's efficiency principle which is suitable only to the normal conditions, but in non-normal conditions.The right to instantly use the resource should be attributed to morality. The efficiency principle of all-round privacy property rights is wrong. We should stick to the efficiency principle of arranging property rights object (or one of object's right properties)to the party who can easily affect output net value through changing the use of right property, or assigning risk responsibility to the one who has the best capability to sustain.
出处
《武汉理工大学学报（社会科学版）》
2004年第3期308-311,共4页
Journal of Wuhan University of Technology:Social Sciences Edition
关键词
产权安排
效率原则
经济效率
assignment of property rights
efficiency principle
economic efficiency
