摘要
网络服务提供者在提供便捷的网络服务时,也收集和存储了大量的个人信息,其中不乏能提供刑事案件侦破线索、甚至本身就能作为证据的信息。当公民主动披露个人信息给网络服务提供者时,公民是否对其信息被侦查人员获悉的可能性“自担风险”?第三方当事人规则秉持“是”的立场,规定公民对其主动披露的个人信息不享有合理隐私期待。对第三方当事人规则的“前身”和理论预设分析后发现,该规则在表面上与网络时代相契合,但在实质上却背离了个人信息保护的真正规范。该规则不仅强化了大数据侦查中“控辩双方”的不对等,而且有可能侵入公民私人领域,危及公民人权。破除第三方当事人规则的惯常思维,解决相关情境难题,需要遵循比例原则之指导,构建令状制度,重新审视隐私权理论,以及确立个人权利优先原则。
Nowadays,the Internet has become another“home”.When providing convenient network services,ISP also collect and store a large amount of personal information,many of which can provide clues to the detection of criminal cases,or even information that can itself be used as evidence.So,when citizens voluntarily disclose personal information to ISP,do citizens“risk at their own risk”for the possibility of their information being obtained by investigators?The third-party doctrine stands in a“yes”position and believes that citizens do not enjoy reasonable privacy expectations.However,after analyzing the“predecessor”and theoretical presuppositions,it’s found that the rules are ostensibly consistent with the Internet age,but actually violate the true norms of personal information protection.This doctrine not only strengthens the big data investigation,but also probably invade the private domain of citizens and endanger the human rights.To break the habitual thinking of the third-party doctrine and solve relevant situational difficulties,it is necessary to follow the guidance of the principle of proportionality,innovate the writ system,re-examine the theory of privacy,and establish the principle of priority of individual rights.
出处
《法商研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2022年第4期76-89,共14页
Studies in Law and Business
基金
国家社会科学基金一般项目(21BFX094)
河南省哲学社会科学规划项目(2020BFX005)
关键词
第三方当事人规则
合理隐私期待
数据共享
隐私权
third-party doctrine
reasonable privacy expectations
data sharing
the right of privacy
