期刊文献+

乳腺浸润性导管癌不同分子分型及病理组织学分级间常规超声征像的差异 被引量:7

Routine ultrasonographic features, molecular subtypes and histological classification of breast invasive ductal carcinoma
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的探讨乳腺浸润性导管癌不同分子分型及病理组织学分级间常规超声征像的差异。方法收集因乳腺肿物入保定市第一中心医院诊疗并最终手术确诊为乳腺浸润性导管癌的患者资料,回顾性分析术前常规超声典型征像及术后病理学资料,比较不同分子分型及病理组织学分级间的超声征像差异及相关性。结果(1)五组分子分型病灶的超声征像均存在统计学差异(P<0.05),其中三阴型多表现为肿物回声均匀(47.2%,17/36),病灶后方回声增强(58.3%,21/36);少表现为回声衰减(5.6%,2/36),微钙化(27.8%,10/36)等。HER-2阳性(HR阳性)多表现为微钙化(77.8%,35/45)伴病灶后方回声衰减(48.9%,22/45)。Luminal A型多表现乏血供(62.2%,46/74)。(2)不同组织学分级病灶的超声征像存在统计学差异(P<0.05)。中高分化组病灶多表现为边缘毛刺征(70.0%,133/190),高回声晕(60.5%,115/190),病灶后方回声衰减(42.1%,80/190);低分化组病灶超声征像多表现为富血供(84.3%,43/51)。多变量logistic回归分析显示,血流分布及肿块后方回声特点是超声影像学辨别低分化组IDC病灶的独立危险因素(P<0.05)。结论乳腺浸润性导管癌的超声检查在一定程度上有助于辨别分子分型及组织学分级程度,为乳腺癌患者个性化治疗方案的选择及预后提供影像学依据。 Objective To explore the difference in conventional ultrasonographic features of breast invasive ductal carcinoma between different molecular subtypes and histopathological grades.Methods The complete clinical data on patients hospitalized due to breast mass bumps and eventually diagnosed with breast invasive ductal carcinoma was collected before the typical preoperative ultrasound features and postoperative pathological data were retrospectively analyzed.The difference and correlations between different molecular subtypes and histopathological grades were analyzed.Results(1)There was significant difference in the ultrasonic signs of molecular subtype lesions between the five groups(P<0.05).Most of the ultrasonic signs of the three-negative lesions showed uniform echo of the tumor(47.2%,17/36),and enhanced echo behind the lesions(58.3%,21/36).Echo attenuation(5.6%,2/36)and microcalcification(27.8%,10/36)were uncommon.Most of the ultrasonographic signs of HER-2 positive(HR positive)lesions were microcalcification(77.8%,35/45)with posterior echo attenuation(48.9%,22/45).Ultrasonographic signs of Luminal A type lesions showed a lack of blood supply among most of the patients(62.2%,46/74).(2)The ultrasonographic signs of lesions of different histological grades were significantly different(P<0.05).Most of the lesions in the moderately and highly differentiated group showed edge spiculation signs(70.0%,133/190),hyperechoic halo(60.5%,115/190),and posterior echo attenuation(42.1%,80/190).The dominating ultrasonographic manifestation of lesions in the poorly-differentiated group was abundant blood supply(84.3%,43/51).Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the distribution of blood supply and the echo characteristics behind the tumors were independent risk factors for identifying IDC lesions via ultrasound imaging in the poorly-differentiated group(P<0.05).Conclusions Ultrasound examination of breast invasive ductal carcinoma can facilitate molecular classification and histological grading,and provide imaging data for personalized treatment and early prediction of therapeutic effect in patients with breast cancer.
作者 刘克 刘颖 屠英暄 刘昕 王园园 李昊 LIU Ke;LIU Ying;TU Yingxuan;LIU Xin;WANG Yuanyuan;LI Hao(Department of Ultrasound,Baoding First Central Hospital,Baoding 071000,China;Department of Function,Baoding Gem Flower Oriental Hospital,Baoding 072550,China)
出处 《武警医学》 CAS 2021年第7期607-611,615,共6页 Medical Journal of the Chinese People's Armed Police Force
关键词 乳腺浸润性导管癌 超声检查 分子分型 组织学分级 IDC ultrasonography molecular classification histological classification
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献35

  • 1American College of Radiology.BI-RADS:ultrasound.In:Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System:BI-RADS Atlas.4th ed.Reston,VA:American College of Radiology,2003.
  • 2Lazarus E,Mainiero MB,Schepps B,et al.BIRADS lexicon for US and mammography:interobserver variability and positive predictive value.Radiology,2006,239:385-391.
  • 3Lee HJ,Kim EK,Kim MJ,et al.Observer variability of Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) for breast ultrasound.Eur J Radiol,2008,65:293-298.
  • 4Park CS,Lee JH,Yim HW,et al.Observer agreement using the ACR Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS)ultrasound,First Edition (2003).Korean J Radiol,2007,8:397-402.
  • 5Abdullah N,Mesurolle B,El-Khoury M,et al.Breast imaging reporting and data system lexicon for US:interobserver agreement for assessment of breast masses.Radiology,2009,252:665-672.
  • 6Landis JR,Koch GG.The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data.Biometrics,1977,33:159-174.
  • 7Berg WA,D' Orsi CJ,Jackson VP,et al.Does training in the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) improve biopsy recommendations or feature analysis agreement with experienced breast imagers at mammography? Radiology,2002,224:871-880.
  • 8Orel SG,Kay N,Reynolds C,et al.BI-RADS categorization as a predictor of malignancy.Radiology,1999,211:845-850.
  • 9Graf O,Helbich TH,Fuchsjaeger MH,et al.Follow-up of palpable circumscribed noncalcified solid breast masses at mammography and US:can biopsy be averted? Radiology,2004,233:850-856.
  • 10包明稳,徐晓红.超声诊断乳腺癌的现状及新技术应用[J].广东医学院学报,2009,27(2):204-205. 被引量:16

共引文献75

同被引文献69

引证文献7

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部