期刊文献+
共找到2篇文章
< 1 >
每页显示 20 50 100
长效硝苯地平对有症状性稳定型心绞痛伴高血压患者死亡率和心血管发病率的影响:ACTION试验 被引量:4
1
作者 Lubsen J. Wagener G. +1 位作者 Kirwan B.-A. 孟欣 《世界核心医学期刊文摘(心脏病学分册)》 2005年第11期54-54,共1页
Objective: To examine the effects of nifedipine GITS on clinical outcome in patients with concurrent stable angina and hypertension. Methods: Data from the double-blind placebo-controlled ACTION trial was stratified f... Objective: To examine the effects of nifedipine GITS on clinical outcome in patients with concurrent stable angina and hypertension. Methods: Data from the double-blind placebo-controlled ACTION trial was stratified for hypertension(blood pressure ≥140/90 mmHg), at baseline. Results: A total of 52%of 7665 ACTION patients were hypertensive. Some 80%were on a βblocker; hypertensives were more often treated with other blood pressure-lowering drugs. Mean baseline blood pressure was 122/74 mmHg among normotensives and 151/85 mmHg among hypertensives. Follow-up blood pressures were reduced by nifedipine(P< 0.001) on the average by 3.9/2.4 and 6.6/3.5 mmHg among normotensives and hypertensives, respectively. Nifedipine GITS significantly(P< 0.05) reduced the combined incidence of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, refractory angina, heart failure, stroke and peripheral revascularization by 13%in hypertensives only. Nifedipine significantly reduced the incidence of any stroke or transient ischemic attack by almost 30%in both subgroups and the need for coronary angiography by 21%in normotensives and 16%in hypertensives. Among hypertensives, the incidence of new overt heart failure was significantly reduced by 38%and of debilitating stroke by 33%. Among normotensives, the need for coronary bypass grafting was significantly reduced by 32%. Nifedipine did not affect all-cause death, cardiovascular death and myocardial infarction in either normo-or hypertensives, but increased the need for peripheral revascularization. Conclusion: The salutary effects of the addition of nifedipine GITS to the basic regimen of patients with concurrent stable symptomatic coronary artery disease and hypertension emphasize the need for blood pressure control. 展开更多
关键词 心血管发病率 稳定型心绞痛 ACTION 血压正常者 血压正常组 血运重建 降压药物 稳定型冠心病 全因死亡 Β阻断剂
暂未订购
基于一个大型随机试验预测稳定性心绞痛队列患者死亡、心肌梗死和卒中的危险评分 被引量:2
2
作者 Tim C Clayton Stuart J Pocock +4 位作者 Jacobus Lubsen Zoltán Vokó Bridget-Anne Kirwan Keith A A Fox Philip A Poole-Wilson 《英国医学杂志中文版》 2006年第1期16-19,共4页
目的对需要抗心绞痛治疗并且左心室功能代偿症状稳定的心绞痛患者建立预测全因死亡、心肌梗死和导致致残性卒中的复合危险评分。设计大型多中心临床试验数据的多变量Cox回归分析。背景西欧、以色列、加拿大、澳大利亚和新西兰的心脏专... 目的对需要抗心绞痛治疗并且左心室功能代偿症状稳定的心绞痛患者建立预测全因死亡、心肌梗死和导致致残性卒中的复合危险评分。设计大型多中心临床试验数据的多变量Cox回归分析。背景西欧、以色列、加拿大、澳大利亚和新西兰的心脏专科门诊患者。入选者7311例具有全部需要资料的患者被入选。主要结局的测量指标平均随访4.9年时间内所有原因的死亡、心肌梗死或者致残性卒中。结果1063例患者发生任何原因死亡或者持久性心肌梗死或者致残性卒中。这些复合终点的5年危险性在危险性最低的十分位患者为4%,而在危险性最高的十分位患者为35%。危险评分结合16项临床常规变量的降序排序是:年龄、左心室射血分数、吸烟、白细胞计数、糖尿病、随机血糖浓度、肌酐浓度、既往卒中病史、1周至少1次心绞痛发作、冠状动脉造影发现(如果能够获得)、降脂治疗、QT间期、收缩期血压≥150mmHg、抗心绞痛药物数量、陈旧性心肌梗死以及性别。把这个模型分别应用于任何原因所致的死亡、心肌梗死和卒中进行预测评估,所得的结果相似。危险评分似乎不能预测事件性质(39%的死亡、46%心肌梗死以及15%致残性卒中)或者冠状动脉造影或血管重建率(占29%的患者)。结论该危险评分对客观地决定稳定性心绞痛患者进一步治疗措施以减少重要预后事件发生是有帮助的。该危险评分同样可以用于将来的计划性试验。 展开更多
关键词 陈旧性心肌梗死 心绞痛患者 稳定性心绞痛 冠状动脉造影 危险评分 随机试验 血管重建 治疗措施 卒中 预测
原文传递
上一页 1 下一页 到第
使用帮助 返回顶部