期刊文献+
共找到4篇文章
< 1 >
每页显示 20 50 100
A review of recent advances(2018–2021)on tropical cyclone intensity change from operational perspectives,part 1:Dynamical model guidance 被引量:3
1
作者 Zhan Zhang Weiguo Wang +19 位作者 James D.Doyle Jonathan Moskaitis William A.Komaromi Julian Heming Linus Magnusson John P.Cangialosi Levi Cowan Michael Brennan Suhong Ma Ananda Kumar Das Hosomi Takuya Peter Clegg Thomas Birchard John A.Knaff John Kaplan Mrutyunjay Mohapatra Monica Sharma Ikegami Masaaki Liguang Wu Eric Blake 《Tropical Cyclone Research and Review》 2023年第1期30-49,共20页
This review summarizes the rapporteur report on tropical cyclone(TC)intensity change from the operational perspective,as presented to the 10th International Workshop on TCs(IWTC-10)held in Bali,Indonesia,from Dec.5–9... This review summarizes the rapporteur report on tropical cyclone(TC)intensity change from the operational perspective,as presented to the 10th International Workshop on TCs(IWTC-10)held in Bali,Indonesia,from Dec.5–9,2022.The accuracy of TC intensity forecasts issued by operational forecast centers depends on three aspects:real-time observations,TC dynamical model forecast guidance,and techniques and methods used by forecasters.The rapporteur report covers the progress made over the past four years(2018–2021)in all three aspects.This review focuses on the progress of dynamical model forecast guidance.The companion paper(Part II)summarizes the advance from operational centers.The dynamical model forecast guidance continues to be the main factor leading to the improvement of operational TC intensity forecasts.Here,we describe recent advances and developments of major operational regional dynamical TC models and their intensity forecast performance,including HWRF,HMON,COAMPS-TC,Met Office Regional Model,CMA-TYM,and newly developed HAFS.The performance of global dynamical models,including NOAA's GFS,Met Office Global Model(MOGM),JMA's GSM,and IFS(ECMWF),has also been improved in recent years due to their increased horizontal and vertical resolution as well as improved data assimilation systems.Recent challenging cases of rapid intensification are presented and discussed. 展开更多
关键词 Dynamical models Intensity forecast Operational forecasts Tropical cyclone
原文传递
A review of recent advances(2018–2021)on tropical cyclone intensity change from operational perspectives,part 2:Forecasts by operational centers 被引量:2
2
作者 Weiguo Wang Zhan Zhang +18 位作者 John P.Cangialosi Michael Brennan Levi Cowan Peter Clegg Hosomi Takuya Ikegami Masaaki Ananda Kumar Das Mrutyunjay Mohapatra Monica Sharma John A.Knaff John Kaplan Thomas Birchard James D.Doyle Julian Heming Jonathan Moskaitis Suhong Ma Charles Sampson Liguang Wu Eric Blake 《Tropical Cyclone Research and Review》 2023年第1期50-63,共14页
This paper summarizes the progress and activities of tropical cyclone(TC)operational forecast centers during the last four years(2018–2021).It is part II of the review on TC intensity change from the operational pers... This paper summarizes the progress and activities of tropical cyclone(TC)operational forecast centers during the last four years(2018–2021).It is part II of the review on TC intensity change from the operational perspective in the rapporteur report presented to the 10th International Workshop on TCs(IWTC)held in Bali,Indonesia,from Dec.5–9,2022.Part I of the review has focused on the progress of dynamical model forecast guidance.This part discusses the performance of TC intensity and rapid intensification forecasts from several operational centers.It is shown that the TC intensity forecast errors have continued to decrease since the 9th IWTC held in 2018.In particular,the improvement of rapid intensification forecasts has accelerated,compared with years before 2018.Consensus models,operational procedures,tools and techniques,as well as recent challenging cases from 2018 to 2021 identified by operational forecast centers are described.Research needs and recommendations are also discussed.©2023 The Shanghai Typhoon Institute of China Meteorological Administration.Publishing services by Elsevier B.V.on behalf of KeAi Communication Co.Ltd.This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). 展开更多
关键词 Forecast error Intensity forecast Operational forecasts Tropical cyclone
原文传递
2016年7月华北极端降水的中期预报误差分析 被引量:14
3
作者 代刊 毕宝贵 朱跃建 《科学通报》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2018年第3期340-355,共16页
2016年7月19~20日华北地区受黄淮气旋影响出现极端降水.数值模式对气旋的中期预报(≥4 d)出现显著偏差.基于欧洲中期天气预报中心集合预报数据,对中期预报误差的来源和演变进行了分析.采用集合敏感性分析显示:敏感系统主要包括新疆以西... 2016年7月19~20日华北地区受黄淮气旋影响出现极端降水.数值模式对气旋的中期预报(≥4 d)出现显著偏差.基于欧洲中期天气预报中心集合预报数据,对中期预报误差的来源和演变进行了分析.采用集合敏感性分析显示:敏感系统主要包括新疆以西高空槽分裂出的短波,及江南上空高度场;气旋强度与敏感系统强弱显著相关,而位置与系统位相关系密切.进一步挑选两组集合成员:一组气旋路径、强度及降水接近实况;另一组则路径偏南且强度偏弱.组间标准差分析显示:有3个来自初始场及早期预报的显著差异区与敏感系统相伴随,包括从西西伯利亚深厚气旋分裂的位涡扰动的前部、后部的正差异区,以及内蒙古西部位涡扰动西侧的负差异区;初始差异区主要位于对流层高层,呈正负相间波列排列;差异区沿位涡梯度带向下游移动,并逐渐向低层伸展.采用统计位涡反演方法探讨误差影响的机制表明,两个正差异区影响了气旋生成的强度和路径,以及下游高压脊的强度;负差异区影响了气旋生成时偏南暖湿气流的输送;预报较准确的成员,表现出更强的高空位涡扰动和低层偏南暖湿气流输送位置更偏北.最后讨论误差形成的可能原因,并指出敏感性分析和成员分组对比可以互补,用于监测中期预报误差的演变和影响. 展开更多
关键词 极端降水 温带气旋 中期预报 模式误差来源 集合预报
原文传递
Calibration of Gridded Wind Speed Forecasts Based on Deep Learning 被引量:8
4
作者 Xuan YANG Kan DAI Yuejian ZHU 《Journal of Meteorological Research》 SCIE CSCD 2023年第6期757-774,共18页
The challenges of applying deep learning(DL) to correct deterministic numerical weather prediction(NWP) biases with non-Gaussian distributions are discussed in this paper.It is known that the DL UNet model is incapabl... The challenges of applying deep learning(DL) to correct deterministic numerical weather prediction(NWP) biases with non-Gaussian distributions are discussed in this paper.It is known that the DL UNet model is incapable of correcting the bias of strong winds with the traditional loss functions such as the MSE(mean square error),MAE(mean absolute error),and WMAE(weighted mean absolute error).To solve this,a new loss function embedded with a physical constraint called MAE_MR(miss ratio) is proposed.The performance of the UNet model with MAE_MR is compared to UNet traditional loss functions,and statistical post-processing methods like Kalman filter(KF) and the machine learning methods like random forest(RF) in correcting wind speed biases in gridded forecasts from the ECMWF high-resolution model(HRES) in East China for lead times of 1–7 days.In addition to MAE for full wind speed,wind force scales based on the Beaufort scale are derived and evaluated.Compared to raw HRES winds,the MAE of winds corrected by UNet(MAE_MR) improves by 22.8% on average at 24–168 h,while UNet(MAE),UNet(WMAE),UNet(MSE),RF,and KF improve by 18.9%,18.9%,17.9%,13.8%,and 4.3%,respectively.UNet with MSE,MAE,and WMAE shows good correction for wind forces 1–3 and 4,but negative correction for 6 or higher.UNet(MAE_MR) overcomes this,improving accuracy for forces 1–3,4,5,and 6 or higher by 11.7%,16.9%,11.6%,and 6.4% over HRES.A case study of a strong wind event further shows UNet(MAE_MR) outperforms traditional post-processing in correcting strong wind biases. 展开更多
关键词 deep learning wind speed grid forecasting loss function statistical post-processing
原文传递
上一页 1 下一页 到第
使用帮助 返回顶部