[目的/意义]论文学科分类是科学计量学领域的核心问题之一,对于科研评价实践具有重要意义。[方法/过程]本研究提出了一种基于多代参考文献的单篇学术论文学科分类方法,其核心是基于对目标文献多代参考文献信息的挖掘形成较为完整的学科...[目的/意义]论文学科分类是科学计量学领域的核心问题之一,对于科研评价实践具有重要意义。[方法/过程]本研究提出了一种基于多代参考文献的单篇学术论文学科分类方法,其核心是基于对目标文献多代参考文献信息的挖掘形成较为完整的学科结构,进而为目标文献分配1~3个学科类别。为验证该方法的有效性,本研究以1999—2018年Web of Science核心合集所收录的学术论文作为研究对象,对单篇论文的学科分类效果进行比较,并从学科领域和期刊层面展开应用场景的探讨。[结果/结论]结果表明,利用多代参考文献的学科类别信息可以降低目标文献中学科分类的熵值,有效提升单篇学术论文的学科分类效果;通过运用不同的权重设置规则和多学科科学处理策略,可以在一定程度上解决多学科期刊文献的学科分类问题,并且可以为跨学科学术论文的识别提供可行方案。展开更多
探究科学基金项目与产出论文的相关性,有助于拓宽科学基金绩效评价的分析维度,对提高科学基金管理水平具有重要意义。本研究从内容相关性的角度出发,引入科学基金项目与产出论文目标一致性的概念,在此基础上提出了基于学科分类和文本主...探究科学基金项目与产出论文的相关性,有助于拓宽科学基金绩效评价的分析维度,对提高科学基金管理水平具有重要意义。本研究从内容相关性的角度出发,引入科学基金项目与产出论文目标一致性的概念,在此基础上提出了基于学科分类和文本主题的目标一致性识别方法,并以国家自然科学基金委员会(National Natural Science Foundation of China,NSFC)资助的项目为例,验证了该方法的科学性和有效性。研究发现,有大量的NSFC项目与其产出论文的目标一致程度较低,且不同目标一致性特征的NSFC项目在各维度上的分布有很大差异。其中,“低学科相似度-低文本相似度”项目在更具影响力的国家自然科学基金重点项目和国家杰出青年科学基金项目中占比更高。结果表明,本研究提出的目标一致性识别方法可以有效弥补单一视角的不足,实现对科学基金项目与产出论文目标一致性的多维度综合识别,为科学基金绩效评价提供了一个新的角度和解决思路。展开更多
In this work,the efficiency of an adsorption process,in which Moroccan diatomite(ND)is used as a low-cost adsorbent to remove Congo red(CR)dye from contaminated waters in batch and column system,was examined.The influ...In this work,the efficiency of an adsorption process,in which Moroccan diatomite(ND)is used as a low-cost adsorbent to remove Congo red(CR)dye from contaminated waters in batch and column system,was examined.The influence of experimental conditions(pH,adsorbent dose and temperature)on the adsorption of CR onto the ND adsorbent was studied.A study of the adsorption kinetics for CR revealed that a pseudo-second-order model provided the best fit to the experimental kinetic data,and the equilibrium data were well described by the Langmuir isotherm model with an adsorption capacity of 6.07 mg/g using 15 g/L of ND,pH=6,contact time 3 h and 25℃.On the other hand,the ND regeneration tests were investigated and showed that the desorption reaches at least 50%when using ethanol as eluent.In addition,the adsorption process in a continuous mode was studied.Breakthrough curves were properly represented by the Yoon—Nelson model.Hence,the adsorption capacity of 5.71 mg/g was reached using 0.114 g of adsorbent,CR concentration of 6 mg/L and a flow of 1 mL/min under 25℃.展开更多
Purpose: In this contribution we provide two new co-authorship indicators based on fractional counting. Design/methodology/approach: Based on the idea of fractional counting we reflect on what should be an acceptable ...Purpose: In this contribution we provide two new co-authorship indicators based on fractional counting. Design/methodology/approach: Based on the idea of fractional counting we reflect on what should be an acceptable indicator for co-authorship between two entities. From this reflection we propose an indicator, the co-authorship score, denoted as cs, using the harmonic mean. Dividing this new indicator by the classical co-authorship indicator based on full counting, leads to a co-authorship intensity indicator.Findings: We show that the indicators we propose have many necessary or at least highly desirable properties for a proper cs-score. It is pointed out that the two new indicators can be used for countries, but also for institutions and other pairs of entities. A small example shows the feasibility of the co-authorship score and the co-authorship intensity indicator.Research limitations: The indicators are not yet tested in real cases.Practical implications: As the notions of co-authorship and collaboration have many aspects, we think that our contribution may help policy management to take yet another aspect into account as part of a multi-faceted description of research outcomes.Originality/value: The indicators we propose cover yet another aspect of co-authorship.展开更多
Purpose:This article aims to determine the percentage of"Sparking"articles among the work of this year’s Nobel Prize winners in medicine,physics,and chemistry.Design/methodology/approach:We focus on under-c...Purpose:This article aims to determine the percentage of"Sparking"articles among the work of this year’s Nobel Prize winners in medicine,physics,and chemistry.Design/methodology/approach:We focus on under-cited influential research among the key publications as mentioned by the Nobel Prize Committee for the 2020 Noble Prize laureates.Specifically,we extracted data from the Web of Science,and calculated the Sparking Indices using the formulas as proposed by Hu and Rousseau in 2016 and 2017.In addition,we identified another type of igniting articles based on the notion in 2017.Findings:In the fields of medicine and physics,the proportions of articles with sparking characteristics share 78.571%and 68.75%respectively,yet,in chemistry 90%articles characterized by"igniting".Moreover,the two types of articles share more than 93%in the work of the Nobel Prize included in this study.Research limitations:Our research did not cover the impact of topic,socio-political,and author’s reputation on the Sparking Indices.Practical implications:Our study shows that the Sparking Indices truly reflect influence of the best research work,so it can be used to detect under-cited influential articles,as well as identifying fundamental work.Originality/value:Our findings suggest that the Sparking Indices have good applicability for research evaluation.展开更多
Requirements for research assessments There are huge differences in mission, emphasis, inherent capability, and targeted utilization of research among scientific institutions. Hence, when it comes to assessments, a on...Requirements for research assessments There are huge differences in mission, emphasis, inherent capability, and targeted utilization of research among scientific institutions. Hence, when it comes to assessments, a one-size-fits-all approach cannot meet the goal(s) of these assessments. Probably even larger differences exist between individuals, research teams and departments.展开更多
文摘[目的/意义]论文学科分类是科学计量学领域的核心问题之一,对于科研评价实践具有重要意义。[方法/过程]本研究提出了一种基于多代参考文献的单篇学术论文学科分类方法,其核心是基于对目标文献多代参考文献信息的挖掘形成较为完整的学科结构,进而为目标文献分配1~3个学科类别。为验证该方法的有效性,本研究以1999—2018年Web of Science核心合集所收录的学术论文作为研究对象,对单篇论文的学科分类效果进行比较,并从学科领域和期刊层面展开应用场景的探讨。[结果/结论]结果表明,利用多代参考文献的学科类别信息可以降低目标文献中学科分类的熵值,有效提升单篇学术论文的学科分类效果;通过运用不同的权重设置规则和多学科科学处理策略,可以在一定程度上解决多学科期刊文献的学科分类问题,并且可以为跨学科学术论文的识别提供可行方案。
文摘探究科学基金项目与产出论文的相关性,有助于拓宽科学基金绩效评价的分析维度,对提高科学基金管理水平具有重要意义。本研究从内容相关性的角度出发,引入科学基金项目与产出论文目标一致性的概念,在此基础上提出了基于学科分类和文本主题的目标一致性识别方法,并以国家自然科学基金委员会(National Natural Science Foundation of China,NSFC)资助的项目为例,验证了该方法的科学性和有效性。研究发现,有大量的NSFC项目与其产出论文的目标一致程度较低,且不同目标一致性特征的NSFC项目在各维度上的分布有很大差异。其中,“低学科相似度-低文本相似度”项目在更具影响力的国家自然科学基金重点项目和国家杰出青年科学基金项目中占比更高。结果表明,本研究提出的目标一致性识别方法可以有效弥补单一视角的不足,实现对科学基金项目与产出论文目标一致性的多维度综合识别,为科学基金绩效评价提供了一个新的角度和解决思路。
文摘In this work,the efficiency of an adsorption process,in which Moroccan diatomite(ND)is used as a low-cost adsorbent to remove Congo red(CR)dye from contaminated waters in batch and column system,was examined.The influence of experimental conditions(pH,adsorbent dose and temperature)on the adsorption of CR onto the ND adsorbent was studied.A study of the adsorption kinetics for CR revealed that a pseudo-second-order model provided the best fit to the experimental kinetic data,and the equilibrium data were well described by the Langmuir isotherm model with an adsorption capacity of 6.07 mg/g using 15 g/L of ND,pH=6,contact time 3 h and 25℃.On the other hand,the ND regeneration tests were investigated and showed that the desorption reaches at least 50%when using ethanol as eluent.In addition,the adsorption process in a continuous mode was studied.Breakthrough curves were properly represented by the Yoon—Nelson model.Hence,the adsorption capacity of 5.71 mg/g was reached using 0.114 g of adsorbent,CR concentration of 6 mg/L and a flow of 1 mL/min under 25℃.
基金supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 7197415071573085)+1 种基金the National Social Science Foundation of China (18VSJ087)the National Laboratory Center for Library and Information Science in Wuhan University。
文摘Purpose: In this contribution we provide two new co-authorship indicators based on fractional counting. Design/methodology/approach: Based on the idea of fractional counting we reflect on what should be an acceptable indicator for co-authorship between two entities. From this reflection we propose an indicator, the co-authorship score, denoted as cs, using the harmonic mean. Dividing this new indicator by the classical co-authorship indicator based on full counting, leads to a co-authorship intensity indicator.Findings: We show that the indicators we propose have many necessary or at least highly desirable properties for a proper cs-score. It is pointed out that the two new indicators can be used for countries, but also for institutions and other pairs of entities. A small example shows the feasibility of the co-authorship score and the co-authorship intensity indicator.Research limitations: The indicators are not yet tested in real cases.Practical implications: As the notions of co-authorship and collaboration have many aspects, we think that our contribution may help policy management to take yet another aspect into account as part of a multi-faceted description of research outcomes.Originality/value: The indicators we propose cover yet another aspect of co-authorship.
基金the National Natural Science Foundation of China Grant numbers:71974167 and 71573225。
文摘Purpose:This article aims to determine the percentage of"Sparking"articles among the work of this year’s Nobel Prize winners in medicine,physics,and chemistry.Design/methodology/approach:We focus on under-cited influential research among the key publications as mentioned by the Nobel Prize Committee for the 2020 Noble Prize laureates.Specifically,we extracted data from the Web of Science,and calculated the Sparking Indices using the formulas as proposed by Hu and Rousseau in 2016 and 2017.In addition,we identified another type of igniting articles based on the notion in 2017.Findings:In the fields of medicine and physics,the proportions of articles with sparking characteristics share 78.571%and 68.75%respectively,yet,in chemistry 90%articles characterized by"igniting".Moreover,the two types of articles share more than 93%in the work of the Nobel Prize included in this study.Research limitations:Our research did not cover the impact of topic,socio-political,and author’s reputation on the Sparking Indices.Practical implications:Our study shows that the Sparking Indices truly reflect influence of the best research work,so it can be used to detect under-cited influential articles,as well as identifying fundamental work.Originality/value:Our findings suggest that the Sparking Indices have good applicability for research evaluation.
文摘Requirements for research assessments There are huge differences in mission, emphasis, inherent capability, and targeted utilization of research among scientific institutions. Hence, when it comes to assessments, a one-size-fits-all approach cannot meet the goal(s) of these assessments. Probably even larger differences exist between individuals, research teams and departments.
