Based on the Etihad Railway Station Project,this study selects a single-span frame bridge with a clear span of 7.3 meters as the research object.A comprehensive structural design process was conducted following the AR...Based on the Etihad Railway Station Project,this study selects a single-span frame bridge with a clear span of 7.3 meters as the research object.A comprehensive structural design process was conducted following the AREMA(2023),Manual for Railway Engineering-Volume 2-Structures,with systematic comparisons of techno-economic differences between the Chinese and American codes through recalculation verification and equivalent-precision design methods.The findings reveal:Recalculation using the Chinese code for identical structural dimensions and reinforcement layouts demonstrates that AREMA code exhibits greater conservatism in both strength requirements and crack control;Under equivalent precision design principles,the Chinese code solution reduces reinforcement by 4.128 t tons and a 19.5%reduction in reinforcement at critical sections compared to the AREMA code,indicating slightly reduced economic efficiency of the AREMA code.This research provides quantitative references for standardized design and specification integration in cross-border railway engineering projects.展开更多
文摘Based on the Etihad Railway Station Project,this study selects a single-span frame bridge with a clear span of 7.3 meters as the research object.A comprehensive structural design process was conducted following the AREMA(2023),Manual for Railway Engineering-Volume 2-Structures,with systematic comparisons of techno-economic differences between the Chinese and American codes through recalculation verification and equivalent-precision design methods.The findings reveal:Recalculation using the Chinese code for identical structural dimensions and reinforcement layouts demonstrates that AREMA code exhibits greater conservatism in both strength requirements and crack control;Under equivalent precision design principles,the Chinese code solution reduces reinforcement by 4.128 t tons and a 19.5%reduction in reinforcement at critical sections compared to the AREMA code,indicating slightly reduced economic efficiency of the AREMA code.This research provides quantitative references for standardized design and specification integration in cross-border railway engineering projects.
