Over the past two decades,our understanding of Lauraceae,a large family of woody plants,has undergone significant advances in phylogeny,taxonomy,and biogeography.Molecular systematic studies have elucidated the basic ...Over the past two decades,our understanding of Lauraceae,a large family of woody plants,has undergone significant advances in phylogeny,taxonomy,and biogeography.Molecular systematic studies have elucidated the basic relationships within the family with plastid phylogenomic analyses providing robust support for deep-level relationships between Lauraceae lineages,leading to the recognition of nine tribes:Hypodaphnideae,Cryptocaryeae,Cassytheae,Neocinnamomeae,Caryodaphnopsideae,Mezilaureae,Perseeae,Laureae,and Cinnamomeae,with Mezilaureae validated here.Nuclear genomes and comparative genomics studies have also clarified aspects of the family’s evolutionary history and metabolic diversity.Taxonomic studies have focused mainly on the most diverse regions,e.g.,tropical Asia,tropical America,and Africa(Madagascar),with six new genera described and five reinstated since the last major overview of the family.The extensive fossil record suggests that Lauraceae diversified globally during the Late Cretaceous and Early Cenozoic.Biogeographic studies indicate that different lineages of the family are sorted into Gondwanan and Laurasian lineages,with patterns resulting from the disruption of boreotropical flora and multiple long-distance dispersal events.Phylogeographic studies,predominantly from East Asia,have shown patterns of in situ survival and demographic stability or expansion during the Quaternary.Nevertheless,many systematic relationships within the family remain unresolved and further research is needed into the complex biogeographic history and ecological roles of Lauraceae.A multifaceted approach integrating genomic studies,field work,morphological and ecological investigations is therefore needed to understand the evolution and diversity of this ecologically and economically significant plant family.展开更多
<p> <span style="font-family:Verdana;">Under the Nigerian privatisation programme, the issues of risk allocation and mitigation were never always properly handled. Historically, there had always ...<p> <span style="font-family:Verdana;">Under the Nigerian privatisation programme, the issues of risk allocation and mitigation were never always properly handled. Historically, there had always been a tendency to dump all the project risks on the private sector partner without properly evaluating whether it was capable of managing them. Extant literature has shown that where the comparative advantages of parties to handle risks are not properly taken into consideration, the allocation of risk is unbalanced and the tendency for the project to run into difficulties and/or fail increases. This paper looks at the electric power sector privatisation, distilling how key project risks were handled under the exercise. This should be a good pointer as to whether the privatisation exercise wo</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">u</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">ld be a success in the long run.</span><span></span> </p>展开更多
基金supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(31970222,31770569,31500454,31500165,32260060,32270217,32260056,31970223,32400180)the Science and Technology Basic Resources Investigation Program of China(2017FY100100,2017FY100102)+7 种基金Biodiversity Conservation Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences(ZSSD-013)National Key Research and Development Program of China(2022YFC2601200,2023YFF0805800)Yunnan Fundamental Research Projects(202201AS070055,202301AU070224)the 14th Five-Year Plan of Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden,Chinese Academy of Sciences(XTBG-1450101)Australian Research Council grant(DP130104314)RSNZ Marsden grant(11-UOO-043)Xingdian Talent Support Program(XDRC-QNRC-2022-0323)Shandong Provincial Natural Science Foundation(ZR2022QC214).
文摘Over the past two decades,our understanding of Lauraceae,a large family of woody plants,has undergone significant advances in phylogeny,taxonomy,and biogeography.Molecular systematic studies have elucidated the basic relationships within the family with plastid phylogenomic analyses providing robust support for deep-level relationships between Lauraceae lineages,leading to the recognition of nine tribes:Hypodaphnideae,Cryptocaryeae,Cassytheae,Neocinnamomeae,Caryodaphnopsideae,Mezilaureae,Perseeae,Laureae,and Cinnamomeae,with Mezilaureae validated here.Nuclear genomes and comparative genomics studies have also clarified aspects of the family’s evolutionary history and metabolic diversity.Taxonomic studies have focused mainly on the most diverse regions,e.g.,tropical Asia,tropical America,and Africa(Madagascar),with six new genera described and five reinstated since the last major overview of the family.The extensive fossil record suggests that Lauraceae diversified globally during the Late Cretaceous and Early Cenozoic.Biogeographic studies indicate that different lineages of the family are sorted into Gondwanan and Laurasian lineages,with patterns resulting from the disruption of boreotropical flora and multiple long-distance dispersal events.Phylogeographic studies,predominantly from East Asia,have shown patterns of in situ survival and demographic stability or expansion during the Quaternary.Nevertheless,many systematic relationships within the family remain unresolved and further research is needed into the complex biogeographic history and ecological roles of Lauraceae.A multifaceted approach integrating genomic studies,field work,morphological and ecological investigations is therefore needed to understand the evolution and diversity of this ecologically and economically significant plant family.
文摘<p> <span style="font-family:Verdana;">Under the Nigerian privatisation programme, the issues of risk allocation and mitigation were never always properly handled. Historically, there had always been a tendency to dump all the project risks on the private sector partner without properly evaluating whether it was capable of managing them. Extant literature has shown that where the comparative advantages of parties to handle risks are not properly taken into consideration, the allocation of risk is unbalanced and the tendency for the project to run into difficulties and/or fail increases. This paper looks at the electric power sector privatisation, distilling how key project risks were handled under the exercise. This should be a good pointer as to whether the privatisation exercise wo</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">u</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">ld be a success in the long run.</span><span></span> </p>
