期刊文献+
共找到2篇文章
< 1 >
每页显示 20 50 100
Meta-analysis of intraperitoneal chemotherapy for gastric cancer 被引量:14
1
作者 Da-ZhiXu You-QingZhan +2 位作者 Xiao-WeiSun Su-MeiCao Qi-RongGeng 《World Journal of Gastroenterology》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2004年第18期2727-2730,共4页
AIM: To assess the efficacy and safety of intraperitoneal chemotherapy in patients undergoing curative resection for gastric cancer through literature review.METHODS: Medline (PubMed) (1980-2003/i), Embase(1980-2003/1... AIM: To assess the efficacy and safety of intraperitoneal chemotherapy in patients undergoing curative resection for gastric cancer through literature review.METHODS: Medline (PubMed) (1980-2003/i), Embase(1980-2003/1), Cancerlit Database (1983-2003/1) and Chinese Biomedicine Database (1990-2003/1) were searched. Language was restricted to Chinese and English.The statistical analysis was performed by RevMan4.2 software provided by the Cochrane Collaboration. The results were expressed with odds ratio for the categorical variables.RESULTS: Eleven trials involving 1 161 cases were included.The pooled odds ratio was 0.51, with a 95% confidence interval (0.40-0.65). Intraperitoneal chemotherapy may benefit the patients after curative resection for locally advanced gastric cancer, and the combination of intraperitoneal chemotherapy with hyperthermia or activated carbon particles may provide more benefits to patients due to the enhanced antitumor activity of drugs. Sensitivity analysis and fail-safe number suggested that the result was comparatively reliable.However, of 11 trials, only 3 studies were of high quality.CONCLUSION: Intraperitoneal chemotherapy after curative resection for locally advanced gastric cancer may be beneficial to patients. Continuous multicenter, randomized,double blind, rigorously designed trials should be conducted to draw definitive conclusions. 展开更多
关键词 META-分析 腹膜腔 化学疗法 胃肿瘤 消化系统
暂未订购
药物治疗的获益与损害——观察性研究与随机试验应相互补充
2
作者 JanPVandenbroucke 陈波斌 林果为 《英国医学杂志中文版》 2005年第1期5-6,共2页
无论国际医学科学已多么发达,比如电子形式的交流瞬间即可完成,某些领域却仍处在另一个世界。以循证医学为旗帜的活动联同其他相关活动,如“Cochrane协作”或《英国医学杂志》(BMJ)的《临床证据》(Clinical Evidence)等,旨在评估所... 无论国际医学科学已多么发达,比如电子形式的交流瞬间即可完成,某些领域却仍处在另一个世界。以循证医学为旗帜的活动联同其他相关活动,如“Cochrane协作”或《英国医学杂志》(BMJ)的《临床证据》(Clinical Evidence)等,旨在评估所希望的治疗获益是否真的存在。这几乎完全依赖于随机对照研究,尤其是针对药物干预性研究。而处在另一个世界的药物流行病学研究, 展开更多
关键词 药物治疗 观察 随机试验 对药 随机对照研究 药物干预 药物流行病学 相互补充 世界 发达
原文传递
上一页 1 下一页 到第
使用帮助 返回顶部