Trace metal levels of groundwater in Lubumbashi,Kampemba and Kamalondo communes of Lubumbashi city were assessed from October 2016 to February 2017.Two hundred forty water samples collected from twenty-two spade-sunk ...Trace metal levels of groundwater in Lubumbashi,Kampemba and Kamalondo communes of Lubumbashi city were assessed from October 2016 to February 2017.Two hundred forty water samples collected from twenty-two spade-sunk wells and twelve drilled wells in these three communes of Lubumbashi city were analyzed for their metal contents using ICP-SF-MS(Inductively Coupled Plasma-Sector Field Mass Spectrometry).Twenty trace elements including strontium,molybdenum,cadmium,cesium,barium,tungsten,thallium,lead,bismuth,uranium,aluminum,vanadium,chromium,manganese,iron,cobalt,nickel,copper,zinc and arsenic were recorded at varying concentrations in all the water samples and were compared with the WHO(World Health Organization),US EPA(Environmental Protection Agency)and EU(European Union)drinking water MCLs(Maximum Concentration Limits)for cadmium,barium,thallium,lead,uranium,aluminum,chromium,manganese,iron,nickel,copper,zinc and arsenic.Mean cadmium,lead,aluminum,manganese,iron,nickel,zinc and arsenic levels respectively exceeded the WHO,US EPA and EU drinking water MCLs in 6.66%,3.38%,26.67%,5.02%,30.03%,3.38%,1.64% and 5.02% of the samples with the highest mean levels of 116.89μg/L for cadmium,38.162μg/L for lead,2,712.5μg/L for aluminum,1,242.68μg/L for manganese,17,325.98μg/L for iron,64.647μg/L for nickel,9,900.72μg/L for zinc and 65.458μg/L for arsenic.Mean water pH values ranged from 4.7 to 11.1 with 19.17% of the groundwater samples having mean pH values outside the WHO drinking water pH optimum range values of 6.5-8.5,including 5.02% of the water samples which were acidic(mean pH values ranging from 4.7 to 6.4)and 14.15% which were alkaline(mean pH values ranging from 8.6 to 11.1).With such physicochemical and trace metal contamination status of groundwater in the three communes of Lubumbashi city,there is a high risk to the health of people who use that water to meet their drinking water needs.展开更多
Cancer is one of the most complex diseases and the second leading cause of mortality worldwide.Due to its poor prognosis and challenges in diagnosis,eradicating cancer remains highly difficult.The limitations associat...Cancer is one of the most complex diseases and the second leading cause of mortality worldwide.Due to its poor prognosis and challenges in diagnosis,eradicating cancer remains highly difficult.The limitations associated with conventional therapies have led to the emergence of copious therapeutic strategies such as chemotherapy,phototherapy,starvation therapy,radiotherapy and immunotherapy;however,limited therapeutic efficacy,poor tumor cell selectivity and substantial adverse effects remain significant concern.Attributed to the expeditious advancement of nanotechnology,the amalgamation of nanomaterials with therapeutic approaches provides an opportunity to address the shortcomings of conventional chemotherapy.Metal-organic frameworks(MOFs),which consist of bridging ligands and ions/clusters connected by coordination bonds,have been widely used in cancer therapy to address the limitations of currently therapeutic interventions,such as poor efficacy,low stability and severe side effects.This potential arises from their tuneable porosities,high specific surface area-to-volume ratio,tailorable diameters,tractable morphologies,variegated compositions,biocompatibility and facile functionalization.We summarized the role of MOF-based nanoplatforms along with mechanistic insights into emerging avenues-such as cuproptosis,ferroptosis,cell-penetrating and biomimetic MOFs,and tumor microenvironment-responsive MOFs-alongside recent advancements in mono-and multifunctional cancer therapeutics.Theragnostic and imaging functionalities,as well as regulatory considerations and future prospects of MOF-based nanoplatforms utilized in cancer treatment,are also discussed.展开更多
文摘Trace metal levels of groundwater in Lubumbashi,Kampemba and Kamalondo communes of Lubumbashi city were assessed from October 2016 to February 2017.Two hundred forty water samples collected from twenty-two spade-sunk wells and twelve drilled wells in these three communes of Lubumbashi city were analyzed for their metal contents using ICP-SF-MS(Inductively Coupled Plasma-Sector Field Mass Spectrometry).Twenty trace elements including strontium,molybdenum,cadmium,cesium,barium,tungsten,thallium,lead,bismuth,uranium,aluminum,vanadium,chromium,manganese,iron,cobalt,nickel,copper,zinc and arsenic were recorded at varying concentrations in all the water samples and were compared with the WHO(World Health Organization),US EPA(Environmental Protection Agency)and EU(European Union)drinking water MCLs(Maximum Concentration Limits)for cadmium,barium,thallium,lead,uranium,aluminum,chromium,manganese,iron,nickel,copper,zinc and arsenic.Mean cadmium,lead,aluminum,manganese,iron,nickel,zinc and arsenic levels respectively exceeded the WHO,US EPA and EU drinking water MCLs in 6.66%,3.38%,26.67%,5.02%,30.03%,3.38%,1.64% and 5.02% of the samples with the highest mean levels of 116.89μg/L for cadmium,38.162μg/L for lead,2,712.5μg/L for aluminum,1,242.68μg/L for manganese,17,325.98μg/L for iron,64.647μg/L for nickel,9,900.72μg/L for zinc and 65.458μg/L for arsenic.Mean water pH values ranged from 4.7 to 11.1 with 19.17% of the groundwater samples having mean pH values outside the WHO drinking water pH optimum range values of 6.5-8.5,including 5.02% of the water samples which were acidic(mean pH values ranging from 4.7 to 6.4)and 14.15% which were alkaline(mean pH values ranging from 8.6 to 11.1).With such physicochemical and trace metal contamination status of groundwater in the three communes of Lubumbashi city,there is a high risk to the health of people who use that water to meet their drinking water needs.
基金funding support by the Department of Pharmaceuticals(DoP),Ministry of Chemicals and Fertilizers,Govt.of India to“Pharmaceutical Innovation and Translational Research Lab”(PITRL),National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research(NIPER),Hyderabad,INDIA.
文摘Cancer is one of the most complex diseases and the second leading cause of mortality worldwide.Due to its poor prognosis and challenges in diagnosis,eradicating cancer remains highly difficult.The limitations associated with conventional therapies have led to the emergence of copious therapeutic strategies such as chemotherapy,phototherapy,starvation therapy,radiotherapy and immunotherapy;however,limited therapeutic efficacy,poor tumor cell selectivity and substantial adverse effects remain significant concern.Attributed to the expeditious advancement of nanotechnology,the amalgamation of nanomaterials with therapeutic approaches provides an opportunity to address the shortcomings of conventional chemotherapy.Metal-organic frameworks(MOFs),which consist of bridging ligands and ions/clusters connected by coordination bonds,have been widely used in cancer therapy to address the limitations of currently therapeutic interventions,such as poor efficacy,low stability and severe side effects.This potential arises from their tuneable porosities,high specific surface area-to-volume ratio,tailorable diameters,tractable morphologies,variegated compositions,biocompatibility and facile functionalization.We summarized the role of MOF-based nanoplatforms along with mechanistic insights into emerging avenues-such as cuproptosis,ferroptosis,cell-penetrating and biomimetic MOFs,and tumor microenvironment-responsive MOFs-alongside recent advancements in mono-and multifunctional cancer therapeutics.Theragnostic and imaging functionalities,as well as regulatory considerations and future prospects of MOF-based nanoplatforms utilized in cancer treatment,are also discussed.
