期刊文献+
共找到19篇文章
< 1 >
每页显示 20 50 100
提高实效性临床试验报告的质量——《CONSORT声明》的扩展 被引量:1
1
作者 Merrick Zwarenstein Shaun Treweek +7 位作者 Joel J Gagnier Douglas G Altman Sean Tunis Brian Haynes Andrew D Oxman David Moher 吴宇峰 刘建平 《中西医结合学报》 CAS 2009年第4期392-397,共6页
近年来实效性临床试验受到更多重视,尤其在传统医学临床评价研究领域。为了提高实效性临床试验报告的质量,CONSORT声明组和医疗保健体系中的实效性随机对照临床试验(pragmatic randomized controlled trials in health care systems,PRA... 近年来实效性临床试验受到更多重视,尤其在传统医学临床评价研究领域。为了提高实效性临床试验报告的质量,CONSORT声明组和医疗保健体系中的实效性随机对照临床试验(pragmatic randomized controlled trials in health care systems,PRACTIHC)小组对《CONSORT声明》进行了修改,以帮助读者评估试验质量和结果的可靠性。实效性试验报告指南,作为《CONSORT声明》的一个特殊扩展,能在报告、评价和应用实效性试验方面帮助编辑、系统评价者、试验设计者和决策者评估实效性试验报告中的信息,判定其结论是否适用,以及干预措施是否可行、可否被接受。2005年1月和2008年3月,在加拿大多伦多分别举行了为期两天的会议来探讨提高随机对照试验对卫生保健决策贡献的方法,焦点集中于实效性试验。2005年会,后扩展版草案修订清单发送至编写组成员,经过几次修订,编写组起草了一份摘要草案。在2008年讨论并修改了这一草案。这份草案发给CONSORT声明组以供修改并发表。这份声明的扩展版提出了对8个条目的补充。及时向国内读者和临床试验研究人员介绍该指南有重要的现实意义和学术价值。北京中医药大学循证医学中心刘建平教授等在短时间内翻译了该指南。本刊希望通过介绍中文版"提高实效性临床试验报告的质量——《CONSORT声明》的扩展"以提高国内实效性临床试验报告的质量,相信也有助于改进试验设计的方法学质量。 展开更多
关键词 CONSORT声明 临床试验报告 试验质量 实效性 随机对照临床试验 医疗保健体系 临床评价 传统医学
暂未订购
CONSORT 2010声明:报告平行对照随机临床试验指南的更新 被引量:49
2
作者 Kenneth F Schulz Douglas G Altman +3 位作者 David Moher 周庆辉 卞兆祥 刘建平 《中西医结合学报》 CAS 2010年第7期604-612,共9页
CONSORT声明被广泛用于提高随机对照临床试验的报告质量。Kenneth Schulz等对CONSORT声明的最新版本CONSORT2010作了详细说明,该版本基于新获得的方法学证据和经验的积累对报告指南作了更新。为了鼓励更多的人使用"CONSORT2010声明... CONSORT声明被广泛用于提高随机对照临床试验的报告质量。Kenneth Schulz等对CONSORT声明的最新版本CONSORT2010作了详细说明,该版本基于新获得的方法学证据和经验的积累对报告指南作了更新。为了鼓励更多的人使用"CONSORT2010声明",本文可从bmj.com免费获取,也将在Lancet,Obstetrics and Gynecology,PLoS Medicine,Annals of Internal Medicine,Open Medicine,Journal of Clinical Epidemiology,BMC Medicine和Trials等杂志发表。 展开更多
关键词 临床试验 随机对照试验 指南 CONSORT
暂未订购
CONSORT 2010说明与详述:报告平行对照随机临床试验指南的更新 被引量:359
3
作者 David Moher Sally Hopewell +9 位作者 Kenneth F Schulz Victor Montori Peter C Gφtzsche P J Devereaux Diana Elbourne Matthias Egger Douglas G Altman 周庆辉 卞兆祥 刘建平 《中西医结合学报》 CAS 2010年第8期701-741,共41页
大量证据显示随机对照临床试验(randomised controlled trial,RCT)的报告质量不理想。报告不透明,则读者既不能评判试验结果是否真实可靠,也不能从中提取可用于系统综述的信息。最近的方法学分析表明,报告不充分和设计不合理与对治疗效... 大量证据显示随机对照临床试验(randomised controlled trial,RCT)的报告质量不理想。报告不透明,则读者既不能评判试验结果是否真实可靠,也不能从中提取可用于系统综述的信息。最近的方法学分析表明,报告不充分和设计不合理与对治疗效果产生评价偏倚有关。这种系统误差对RCT损害严重,而RCT正是以其能减少或避免偏倚而被视为评价干预措施的金标准。为了提高RCT的报告质量,一个由专家和编辑组成的工作组制定了临床试验报告的统一标准(Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials,CONSORT)声明。CONSORT声明于1996年首次发表,并于2001年更新。声明由对照检查清单和流程图组成,供作者在报告RCT时使用。许多核心医学期刊和主要国际性编辑组织都已认可CONSORT声明。该声明促进了对RCT的严格评价和解释。2001年,在对CONSORT进行修订时,人们就已经清楚地认识到,解释和说明制定CONSORT声明的原理,有助于研究人员等撰写或评价临床试验报告。一篇CONSORT说明与详述文章于2001年同2001版CONSORT声明一起发表。2007年1月的专家会议之后,对CONSORT声明作了进一步修订并已发表,即"CONSORT2010声明"。这次更新对原版对照检查清单作了文字上的修改,使其更为明晰,并收入了与一些新近才认识到的主题相关的建议,如选择性报告结局产生的偏倚。说明与详述文件旨在加强人们对CONSORT声明的理解、应用和传播,这次也作了大量修订,对每一项新增或更新的清单条目的含义和增改理由进行了解释,提供了优秀的报告实例,还尽可能地提供了相关的经验性研究的参考文献。文中收入了若干流程图实例。"CONSORT2010声明"、其说明与详述文件,以及相关网站(www.consort-statement.org),对于改进随机临床试验报告必将有所裨益。 展开更多
关键词 临床试验 随机对照试验 指南 CONSORT
暂未订购
A nested case-control study of maternal-neonatal transmission of hepatitis B virus in a Chinese population 被引量:23
4
作者 Li-Zhang Chen Wen-Qi Zhou +2 位作者 Shu-Shan Zhao Zhi-Yu Liu Shi-Wu Wen 《World Journal of Gastroenterology》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2011年第31期3640-3644,共5页
AIM:To examine the determinants of maternal-neonatal transmission of hepatitis B virus(HBV) METHODS:A nested case-control study was conducted in Changsha,Hunan,People's Republic of China from January 1,2005 to Sep... AIM:To examine the determinants of maternal-neonatal transmission of hepatitis B virus(HBV) METHODS:A nested case-control study was conducted in Changsha,Hunan,People's Republic of China from January 1,2005 to September 31,2006 To avoid potential maternal blood contamination,we collected vein blood of newborns immediately after birth and before initial hepatitis B vaccination to determine the HBV infection status of the newborn For each HBsAg-positive infant,one HBsAg-negative infant born to an HBsAg-positive mother was matched by hospital at birth(same),gender(same),and date of birth(within 1 mo) A faceto-face interview was conducted to collect clinical and epidemiological data Conditional logistic regression analysis was used to estimate the independent effects of various determinants on maternal-neonatal transmission of HBV RESULTS:A total of 141 HBsAg-positive infants and 141 individually matched HBsAg-negative infants were included in the final analysis Maternal first-degree family history of HBV infection,intrahepatic cholestasis,and premature rupture of membranes were risk factors for perinatal transmission of HBV,whereas systematic treatment and HBV immunoglobulin injections for mothers with HBV infection were protective factors for maternal-neonatal transmission of HBV,after adjustment for potential confounding factors CONCLUSION:For HBsAg-positive mothers,systematic treatment,HBV immunoglobulin administration,and controlling intrahepatic cholestasis and pregnancy complications may reduce the incidence of perinatal transmission of HBV. 展开更多
关键词 HBsAg-positive Hepatitis B virus Perinatal transmission:Nested case-control study
在线阅读 下载PDF
保证随机临床试验报告的透明、准确和完整 被引量:1
5
作者 David Moher 周庆辉(翻译) +1 位作者 卞兆祥(审校) 刘建平(审校) 《中西医结合学报》 CAS 2010年第7期601-603,共3页
Transparent reports of randomized trials occupy a central position in the delivery of evidence-based medicine;they can be used in systematic reviews and meta-analyses and,in turn,these reviews are often the starting p... Transparent reports of randomized trials occupy a central position in the delivery of evidence-based medicine;they can be used in systematic reviews and meta-analyses and,in turn,these reviews are often the starting point for appropriately developed practice guidance for clinicians.The most useful trial reports are those that are transparent,namely,the design and conduct is accurately and completely reported.Such reports enable readers to understand how the trial was conducted and therefore interpret the results.Reports that fail to meet this criterion are problematic for everybody — readers are left with an incomplete picture of what was done.As such,they are not able to judge the reliability and validity of the results and interpret them.Inadequate reporting is also problematic for those who participate in trials in the hope that their contributions will be of use to future patients;it diminishes this possibility. 展开更多
关键词 随机对照试验 试验报告 透明性 报告 CONSORT
暂未订购
知证卫生决策工具之七--查找系统评价 被引量:1
6
作者 John N Lavis Andrew D Oxman +9 位作者 Jeremy Grimshaw Marit Johansen Jennifer A Boyko Simon Lewin Atle Fretheim 李幼平 王莉 袁强 蒋兰慧 杜亮 《中国循证医学杂志》 CSCD 2010年第4期381-387,共7页
系统评价越来越成为决策的重要信息来源,尤其对评价方案效果更重要。相对于单个研究,系统评价对评价方案效果有很多优势,也被视为找准问题和为备选方案提供补充意见的重要信息来源。系统评价可从比较的角度看问题,也可描述一个方案可能... 系统评价越来越成为决策的重要信息来源,尤其对评价方案效果更重要。相对于单个研究,系统评价对评价方案效果有很多优势,也被视为找准问题和为备选方案提供补充意见的重要信息来源。系统评价可从比较的角度看问题,也可描述一个方案可能产生的危害。系统评价有助于理解对同一问题个人或群体怎样实施、为什么要这样实施及利益相关者对此方案的看法和经验。但大量限制因素妨碍了系统评价在决策方面更广泛的应用。这些限制因素包括对系统评价价值缺乏认识和当试图检索系统评价时决策者使用的检索词与这些系统评价原作者标注的检索词不匹配。决策者检索的信息类型与系统评价原作者未明确标注该信息类型间不匹配成为突出问题。本文我们将提出三个问题用于指导全面查找系统评价,特别是对备选方案效果评价的系统评价。这些问题包括:①是否真正需要系统评价?②可以通过哪些数据库和检索策略找到相关的系统评价?③若无相关系统评价可获得哪些替代信息? 展开更多
关键词 检索系统 卫生决策 信息来源 工具 备选方案 利益相关者 检索词 检索策略
暂未订购
Increasing our return on investment in science:Start with better behavior
7
作者 David Moher 《Journal of Sport and Health Science》 SCIE CSCD 2023年第3期281-283,共3页
In August of 2022,I gave the opening keynote address at the 5th North American Congress on Biomechanics,in Ottawa,Canada.The topic of my talk was about whether the research ecosystem was getting a reasonable return on... In August of 2022,I gave the opening keynote address at the 5th North American Congress on Biomechanics,in Ottawa,Canada.The topic of my talk was about whether the research ecosystem was getting a reasonable return on its investment in biomedical research.I provided several examples as to why I posed this question. 展开更多
关键词 RETURN CANADA INVESTMENT
在线阅读 下载PDF
Diagnostic accuracy of thoracic imaging modalities for the detection of COVID-19
8
作者 Haben Dawit Marissa Absi +2 位作者 Nayaar Islam Sanam Ebrahimzadeh Matthew D F McInnes 《World Journal of Radiology》 2022年第2期47-49,共3页
The ongoing coronavirus disease 2019(COVID-19)pandemic continues to present diagnostic challenges.The use of thoracic radiography has been studied as a method to improve the diagnostic accuracy of COVID-19.The‘Living... The ongoing coronavirus disease 2019(COVID-19)pandemic continues to present diagnostic challenges.The use of thoracic radiography has been studied as a method to improve the diagnostic accuracy of COVID-19.The‘Living’Cochrane Systematic Review on the diagnostic accuracy of imaging tests for COVID-19 is continuously updated as new information becomes available for study.In the most recent version,published in March 2021,a meta-analysis was done to determine the pooled sensitivity and specificity of chest X-ray(CXR)and lung ultrasound(LUS)for the diagnosis of COVID-19.CXR gave a sensitivity of 80.6%(95%CI:69.1-88.6)and a specificity of 71.5%(95%CI:59.8-80.8).LUS gave a sensitivity rate of 86.4%(95%CI:72.7-93.9)and specificity of 54.6%(95%CI:35.3-72.6).These results differed from the findings reported in the recent article in this journal where they cited the previous versions of the study in which a metaanalysis for CXR and LUS could not be performed.Additionally,the article states that COVID-19 could not be distinguished,using chest computed tomography(CT),from other respiratory diseases.However,the latest review version identifies chest CT as having a specificity of 80.0%(95%CI:74.9-84.3),which is much higher than the previous version which indicated a specificity of 61.1%(95%CI:42.3-77.1).Therefore,CXR,chest CT and LUS have the potential to be used in conjunction with other methods in the diagnosis of COVID-19. 展开更多
关键词 COVID-19 Chest x-ray Computed tomography Lung ultrasound Specificity and sensitivity Diagnostic accuracy
暂未订购
Tips for clinicians in selecting a research topic and getting it published
9
作者 Shi Wu Wen 《妇产与遗传(电子版)》 2013年第4期1-10,共10页
How to select a research topic that is appropriate for a clinician and that can lead to a peer-reviewed publication?In this essay,I will provide 5 tips:keep it interesting,keep it relevant,keep it inclusive,keep it si... How to select a research topic that is appropriate for a clinician and that can lead to a peer-reviewed publication?In this essay,I will provide 5 tips:keep it interesting,keep it relevant,keep it inclusive,keep it simple,and keep it trying.Keep it 展开更多
关键词 Tips for clinicians in selecting a research topic and getting it published
暂未订购
卫生经济学评价报告标准共识2022(CHEERS 2022):卫生经济学评价报告指导意见更新版 被引量:119
10
作者 Don Husereau Michael Drummond +20 位作者 Federico Augustovski Esther de Bekker-Grob Andrew H Briggs Chris Carswell Lisa Caulley Nathorn Chaiyakunapruk Dan Greenberg Elizabeth Loder Josephine Mauskopf C Daniel Mullins Stavros Petrou Raoh-Fang Pwu Sophie Staniszewska on behalf of CHEERSISPOR Good Research Practices Task Force 肖月(译) 邱英鹏(译) 史黎炜(译) 张治国(译) 张歆(译) 王海银(译) 翟铁民(译) 《英国医学杂志中文版》 2022年第8期460-465,共6页
卫生经济学评价是对备选行动方案的成本和结果的比较分析。2013年发表的《卫生经济学评价报告标准共识》(CHEERS)提出了卫生经济学评价的特点,确保结果正确阐释,以支持决策制订。2013版CHEERS旨在指导研究报告撰写者准确报告卫生干预和... 卫生经济学评价是对备选行动方案的成本和结果的比较分析。2013年发表的《卫生经济学评价报告标准共识》(CHEERS)提出了卫生经济学评价的特点,确保结果正确阐释,以支持决策制订。2013版CHEERS旨在指导研究报告撰写者准确报告卫生干预和对照措施、背景、过程、结果等评价细节,使审稿人理解文章内容,帮助读者使用研究结果。本版共识将取代2013版共识,其更加适用于各类卫生经济学评价,结合学科发展和方法更新的需要,更注重患者、公众等相关利益方的参与。本共识适用多种个体或人群健康干预措施(简单或复杂)在不同政策场景的应用分析,包括医疗服务、公共卫生、教育、社会服务等。本文概要介绍了CHEERS 2022共识中包含的28个检查项及每一个检查项的相关建议。CHEERS 2022共识主要用于指导研究人员撰写拟投递同行评议学术期刊的卫生经济学评价文章,亦可用于期刊编辑和审稿专家对待发表文章的评价。熟悉了解本共识要求,还有助于研究人员规划评价研究。随着决策透明度要求提高,本共识可支持卫生技术评估机构建立评价报告标准。 展开更多
关键词 期刊编辑 审稿专家 检查项 学术期刊 审稿人 公共卫生 人群健康 评价报告
原文传递
卫生经济学评价报告标准共识(CHEERS)声明 被引量:13
11
作者 Don Husercau Michael Drumrnond +8 位作者 Stavrps Petrpi Chris Carswell editor David Moher Dan Greeuberg Federico Argustovski Andrew H Briggs Josephine Mauskopf Elizabeth Loder 杨莉 《英国医学杂志中文版》 2013年第3期166-170,共5页
卫生干预的经济学评价对报告提出特殊挑战,有必要统一和更新已有的指南并促进其以一种用户友好的方式使用。卫生经济学评价报告标准共识(CHEERS)声明是对以前的卫生经济学评价指南的继承和更新,并将其转化为与时俱进的实用报告指南,... 卫生干预的经济学评价对报告提出特殊挑战,有必要统一和更新已有的指南并促进其以一种用户友好的方式使用。卫生经济学评价报告标准共识(CHEERS)声明是对以前的卫生经济学评价指南的继承和更新,并将其转化为与时俱进的实用报告指南,CHEERS声明的主要读者是报告经济学评价结果的研究人员和评估经济学评价结果的编辑和审稿人。对医学编辑的调查确定了需要新的报告指南,基于系统综述创建了可能的条目清单。之后进行了两轮改进的德尔菲专家咨询,这些专家来自学术界、临床医生、企业、政府和编辑。从44个候选条目中确定了24个条目及建议。这些建议包含在一个用户友好的24条目清单里。声明、清单和这个报告可在ISPOR网站的卫生经济学评价指南工作组网站上找到 (www. ispor, org/TaskForces/EeonomicPub (;uidelines. asp )我们希望CHEERS带来更好的报告,最终带来更好的卫生决策,为了便于传播和获取,CHEERS声明刊登在10种卫生经济学和医学期刊上。我们鼓励其他期刊和团体支持CHEERS。作者团队计划在5年后更新清单,卫生经济学评价是用来辅助资源分配决策的,经济学评价被定义为“依照它们的成本和效果对可供选择的行动方案进行比较分析”,所有经济学评价都评估成本,但测量和评估健康干预效果的方法可能有所不同(框图1)。经济学评价已广泛应用于卫生政策,包括干预项目(如疫苗接种、筛检和健康促进)、诊断、治疗(如药物和外科手术)、护理和康复的评估。经济学评价越来越多地用于决策,并且是国际卫生技术评估项目的一个重要组成部分^2。 展开更多
关键词 卫生经济学评价 报告标准 卫生技术评估 评价指南 医学编辑 报告指南 专家咨询 医学期刊
原文传递
过于复杂的研究报告规范是否降低了我们对优质临床试验的关注度? 被引量:1
12
作者 Jeremy Howick Rebecca Webster +2 位作者 J AndréKnottnerus David Moher 夏爽(译) 《英国医学杂志中文版》 2021年第11期630-632,共3页
Jeremy Howick、Rebecca Webster和J AndréKnottnerus认为,对复杂的研究报告规范的日益重视正在妨碍优质临床试验的设计和开展。但David Moher认为,尽管遵循这些规范会让人有挫败感,但这种复杂性仍是必要的,它不会阻碍研究,反而能... Jeremy Howick、Rebecca Webster和J AndréKnottnerus认为,对复杂的研究报告规范的日益重视正在妨碍优质临床试验的设计和开展。但David Moher认为,尽管遵循这些规范会让人有挫败感,但这种复杂性仍是必要的,它不会阻碍研究,反而能使其更加完善。 展开更多
关键词 临床试验 挫败感 报告规范 关注度 HOW 复杂性 优质
原文传递
Predicting long-term outcomes in acute intracerebral haemorrhage using delayed prognostication scores 被引量:1
13
作者 Ronda Lun Vignan Yogendrakumar +4 位作者 Tim Ramsay Michel Shamy Robert Fahed Magdy H Selim Dar Dowlatshahi 《Stroke & Vascular Neurology》 SCIE CSCD 2021年第4期536-541,I0013-I0025,共19页
Objective The concept of the‘self-fulfilling prophecy’is well established in intracerebral haemorrhage(ICH).The ability to improve prognostication and prediction of long-term outcomes during the first days of hospit... Objective The concept of the‘self-fulfilling prophecy’is well established in intracerebral haemorrhage(ICH).The ability to improve prognostication and prediction of long-term outcomes during the first days of hospitalisation is important in guiding conversations around goals of care.We previously demonstrated that incorporating delayed imaging into various prognostication scores for ICH improves the predictive accuracy of 90-day mortality.However,delayed prognostication scores have not been used to predict long-term functional outcomes beyond 90 days.Design,setting and participants We analysed data from the ICH Deferoxamine trial to see if delaying the use of prognostication scores to 96 hours after ICH onset will improve performance to predict outcomes at 180 days.276 patients were included.Interventions and measurements We calculated the original ICH score(oICH),modified-ICH score(MICH),max-ICH score and the FUNC score on presentation(baseline),and on day 4(delayed).Outcomes assessed were mortality and poor functional outcome in survivors(defined as modified Rankin Scale of 4-5)at 180 days.We generated receiver operating characteristic curves,and measured the area under the curve values(AUC)for mortality and functional outcome.We compared baseline and delayed AUCs with non-parametric methods.Results At 180 days,21 of 276(7.6%)died.Out of the survivors,54 of 255 had poor functional outcome(21.2%).The oICH,MICH and max-ICH performed significantly better at predicting 180-day mortality when calculated 4 days later compared with their baseline equivalents((0.74 vs 0.83,p=0.005),(0.73 vs 0.80,p=0.036),(0.74 vs 0.83,p=0.008),respectively).The delayed calculation of these scores did not significantly improve our accuracy for predicting poor functional outcomes.Conclusion Delaying the calculation of prognostication scores in acute ICH until day 4 improved prediction of 6-month mortality but not functional outcomes.Trial registration number ClinicalTrials.gov Registry(NCT02175225). 展开更多
关键词 ACUTE DELAYED SCORE
原文传递
Declaration of transparency for each research article 被引量:1
14
作者 Douglas G.Altman David Moher 《Family Medicine and Community Health》 2013年第3期1-4,共4页
“It is the responsibility of everyone involved to ensure that the published record is an unbiased,accurate representation of research”[1].The research record is often manipulated for short term gain but at the risk ... “It is the responsibility of everyone involved to ensure that the published record is an unbiased,accurate representation of research”[1].The research record is often manipulated for short term gain but at the risk of harm to patients.The medical research community needs to implement changes to ensure that readers obtain the truth about all research,especially reports of randomised trials,which hold a special place in answering what works best for patients. 展开更多
关键词 TRANSPARENCY EVERYONE RECORD
原文传递
改进实效型试验的报告质量:CONSORT声明的扩充(2) 被引量:1
15
作者 Merrick Zwarenstein Shaun Treweek +6 位作者 Joel J Gagnier Douglas G Altman Sean Tunis Brian Haynes Andrew D Oxman David Moher 汪谋岳(译) 《英国医学杂志中文版》 2009年第3期174-179,共6页
实效型试验旨在为临床实践决策提供依据,但报告得不好会降低其实用性。CONSORT和Practihc小组描述了对CONSORT指南的修改,帮助读者评估研究结果的适用性。
关键词 CONSORT声明 报告质量 试验 临床实践 适用性
原文传递
改进实效型试验的报告质量:CONSORT声明的扩充(1) 被引量:1
16
作者 Merrick Zwarenstein Shaun Treweek +6 位作者 Joel J Gagnier Douglas G Altman Sean Tunis Brian Haynes Andrew D Oxman David Moher 汪谋岳(译) 《英国医学杂志中文版》 2009年第2期108-111,共4页
实效型试验旨在为临床实践决策提供依据,但报告得不好会降低其实用性。CONSORT和Practihc小组描述了对CONSORT指南的修改,帮助读者评估研究结果的适用性。
关键词 CONSORT声明 报告质量 试验 临床实践 适用性
原文传递
CONSORT 2010声明:报告平行对照随机临床试验指南的更新 被引量:3
17
作者 Kenneth F Schulz Douglas G Altman David Moher 《中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版)》 2011年第1期64-72,共9页
CONSORT声明被广泛应用于提高随机对照临床试验的报告质量。Kenneth Schulz等对CONSORT声明的最新版本CONSORT 2010作了详细说明,该版本基于新获得的方法学证据和经验的积累对报告指南作了更新。为了鼓励更多的人使用"CONSORT 201... CONSORT声明被广泛应用于提高随机对照临床试验的报告质量。Kenneth Schulz等对CONSORT声明的最新版本CONSORT 2010作了详细说明,该版本基于新获得的方法学证据和经验的积累对报告指南作了更新。为了鼓励更多的人使用"CONSORT 2010声明",本文可从www.bmj.com免费获取,也将在Lancet,Obstetrics and Gynecology,PLoS Medicine,Annals of Internal Medicine,Open Medicine,Journal of Clinical Epidemiology,BMC Medicine和Trials等杂志发表。 展开更多
关键词 临床试验 随机对照试验 指南 CONSORT
原文传递
设计和开展随机实施试验:研究者指南
18
作者 Luke Wolfenden Robbie Foy +18 位作者 Justin Presseau Jeremy M Grimshaw Noah M Ivers Byron J Powell Monica Taljaard John Wiggers Rachel Sutherland Nicole Nathan Christopher M Williams Melanie Kingsland Andrew Milat Rebecca K Hodder Sze Lin Yoong 玉炫(译) 吴守媛(译) 兰慧(译) 张静怡(译) 李沁原(校) 陈耀龙(校) 《英国医学杂志中文版》 2021年第11期646-655,共10页
实施科学是一门研究方法的学科,旨在实践和政策中促进循证干预措施的系统实施,进而改善健康。尽管实施研究需要高质量的证据,但实施策略的随机试验往往存在较为严重的局限性。这些局限性包括存在偏倚风险、缺乏理论运用、缺乏描述实施... 实施科学是一门研究方法的学科,旨在实践和政策中促进循证干预措施的系统实施,进而改善健康。尽管实施研究需要高质量的证据,但实施策略的随机试验往往存在较为严重的局限性。这些局限性包括存在偏倚风险、缺乏理论运用、缺乏描述实施策略标准术语、局限于实施结局以及不充分报告。本文旨在对实施策略随机试验的设计、实施和报告提供指导,以提升循证实施科学。由研究人员、卫生政策制订者和实践者组成的国际小组整合了构建随机试验方法的重要文献和实施科学的最新进展。本文为实施策略随机试验的主要内容提供指导,包括试验目的阐明、试验中人员招募和保留策略、随机设计的选择、实施科学理论和框架的使用、测量(结局指标)、样本量计算、伦理审查和试验报告。本文也关注了实施试验中需要特别重视或调整的主题。为了推进实施策略随机试验的严格开展和报告,我们建议将本指南作为研究人员、卫生保健和公共卫生政策制订者或实践者、研究资助者和期刊编辑的参考资料。 展开更多
关键词 实施策略 参考资料 期刊编辑 随机试验 卫生保健 伦理审查 公共卫生 试验报告
原文传递
Association between change of health care providers and pregnancy exposure to FDA category C, D and X drugs
19
作者 Yang Jianzhou Xie Rihua +4 位作者 Daniel Krewski Wang Yongjin Mark Walker Cao Wenjun Shi Wu Wen 《Chinese Medical Journal》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2014年第4期702-706,共5页
Background Changing health care providers frequently breaks the continuity of care,which is associated with many health care problems.The purpose of this study was to examine the association between a change of health... Background Changing health care providers frequently breaks the continuity of care,which is associated with many health care problems.The purpose of this study was to examine the association between a change of health care providers and pregnancy exposure to FDA category C,D and X drugs.Methods A 50% random sample of women who gave a birth in Saskatchewan between January 1,1997 and December 31,2000 were chosen for this study.The association between the number of changes in health care providers and with pregnancy exposure to category C,D,and X drugs for those women with and without chronic diseases were evaluated using multiple logistical regression,with adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and its 95% confidence intervals (C/s) as the association measures.Results A total of 18 568 women were included in this study.Rates of FDA C,D,and X drug uses were 14.35%,17.07%,21.72%,and 31.14%,in women with no change of provider,1-2 changes,3-5 changes,and more than 5 changes of health care providers.An association between the number of changes of health care providers and pregnancy exposure to FDA C,D,and X drugs existed in women without chronic diseases but not in women with chronic disease.Conclusion Change of health care providers is associated with pregnancy exposure to FDA category C,D and X drugs in women without chronic diseases. 展开更多
关键词 change health care providers prescription drugs FDA pregnancy risk classification PREGNANCY
原文传递
上一页 1 下一页 到第
使用帮助 返回顶部