Humanoid robots possess technical features such as external human-like appearance,intelligence,and human-machine hybrid control.These may lead to the anthropomorphic trap,expanding the risk of infringement and complic...Humanoid robots possess technical features such as external human-like appearance,intelligence,and human-machine hybrid control.These may lead to the anthropomorphic trap,expanding the risk of infringement and complicating the attribution of liability.Different causes of infringement result in different types of infringement,which have different focuses in legal practice.Therefore,on the basis of clear classification standards,a typified discussion can be conducted.After dividing them into two major types:passive infringement and active infringement,further subdivisions can be made to clarify the nature and resolution of each type of infringement.Among the various types of infringement,the type caused by learning algorithms is the most distinctive due to its autonomous occurrence and difficulty in explanation.The method of law and economics can be utilized to allocate responsibilities among the relevant parties involved in the humanoid robot industry chain:humanoid robot manufacturers should follow the dynamic national regulations based on their development stage and different application scenarios under the guidance of the Hand Formula;users should be responsible for their negligent behavior due to failure to fulfill reasonable care obligations;and providers of general artificial intelligence models may be held jointly liable with humanoid robot product providers if they fail to fulfill the responsibility of transparency.展开更多
文摘Humanoid robots possess technical features such as external human-like appearance,intelligence,and human-machine hybrid control.These may lead to the anthropomorphic trap,expanding the risk of infringement and complicating the attribution of liability.Different causes of infringement result in different types of infringement,which have different focuses in legal practice.Therefore,on the basis of clear classification standards,a typified discussion can be conducted.After dividing them into two major types:passive infringement and active infringement,further subdivisions can be made to clarify the nature and resolution of each type of infringement.Among the various types of infringement,the type caused by learning algorithms is the most distinctive due to its autonomous occurrence and difficulty in explanation.The method of law and economics can be utilized to allocate responsibilities among the relevant parties involved in the humanoid robot industry chain:humanoid robot manufacturers should follow the dynamic national regulations based on their development stage and different application scenarios under the guidance of the Hand Formula;users should be responsible for their negligent behavior due to failure to fulfill reasonable care obligations;and providers of general artificial intelligence models may be held jointly liable with humanoid robot product providers if they fail to fulfill the responsibility of transparency.
