H pylori gastric infection is one of the most prevalent infectious diseases worldwide. The discovery that most upper gastrointestinal diseases are related to Hpylori infection and therefore can be treated with antibio...H pylori gastric infection is one of the most prevalent infectious diseases worldwide. The discovery that most upper gastrointestinal diseases are related to Hpylori infection and therefore can be treated with antibiotics is an important medical advance. Currently, a first-line triple therapy based on proton pump inhibitor （PPI） or ranitidine bismuth citrate （RBC） plus two antibiotics （darithromycin and amoxicillin or nitroimidazole） is recommended by all consensus conferences and guidelines. Even with the correct use of this drug combination, infection can not be eradicated in up to 23% of patients. Therefore, several second line therapies have been recommended. A 7 d quadruple therapy based on PPI, bismuth, tetracycline and metronidazole is the more frequently accepted. However, with second-line therapy, bacterial eradication may fail in up to 40% of cases. When Hpylori eradication is striclly indicated the choice of further treatment is controversial. Currently, a standard third-line therapy is lacking and various protocols have been proposed. Even after two consecutive failures, the most recent literature data have demonsbated that Hpylori eradication can be achieved in almost all patients, even when antibiotic susceptibility is not tested. Different possibilities of empirical treatment exist and the available third-line strategies are herein reviewed.展开更多
BACKGROUND Due to increasing resistance rates of Helicobacter pylori(H.pylori)to different antibiotics,failures in eradication therapies are becoming more frequent.Even though eradication criteria and treatment algori...BACKGROUND Due to increasing resistance rates of Helicobacter pylori(H.pylori)to different antibiotics,failures in eradication therapies are becoming more frequent.Even though eradication criteria and treatment algorithms for first-line and second-line therapy against H.pylori infection are well-established,there is no clear recommendation for third-line and rescue therapy in refractory H.pylori infection.AIM To perform a systematic review evaluating the efficacy and safety of rescue therapies against refractory H.pylori infection.METHODS A systematic search of available rescue treatments for refractory H.pylori infection was conducted on the National Library of Medicine’s PubMed search platform based on Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines.Randomized or non-randomized clinical trials and observational studies evaluating the effectiveness of H.pylori infection rescue therapies were included.RESULTS Twenty-eight studies were included in the analysis of mean eradication rates as rescue therapy,and 21 of these were selected for analysis of mean eradication rate as third-line treatment.For rifabutin-,sitafloxacin-,levofloxacin-,or metronidazole-based triple-therapy as third-line treatment,mean eradication rates of 81.6%and 84.4%,79.4%and 81.5%,55.7%and 60.6%,and 62.0%and 63.0%were found in intention-to-treat(ITT)and per-protocol(PP)analysis,respectively.For third-line quadruple therapy,mean eradication rates of 69.2%and 72.1%were found for bismuth quadruple therapy(BQT),88.9%and 90.9%for bismuth quadruple therapy,three-in-one,Pylera®(BQT-Pylera),and 61.3%and 64.2%for non-BQT)in ITT and PP analysis,respectively.For rifabutin-,sitafloxacin-,levofloxacin-,or metronidazole-based triple therapy as rescue therapy,mean eradication rates of 75.4%and 78.8%,79.4 and 81.5%,55.7%and 60.6%,and 62.0%and 63.0%were found in ITT and PP analysis,respectively.For quadruple therapy as rescue treatment,mean eradication rates of 76.7%and 79.2%for BQT,84.9%and 87.8%for BQT-Pylera,and 61.3%and 64.2%for non-BQT were found in ITT and PP analysis,respectively.For susceptibility-guided therapy,mean eradication rates as third-line and rescue treatment were 75.0%in ITT and 79.2%in PP analysis.CONCLUSION We recommend sitafloxacin-based triple therapy containing vonoprazan in regions with low macrolide resistance profile.In regions with known resistance to macrolides or unavailability of bismuth,rifabutin-based triple therapy is recommended.展开更多
Objective As there is currently no clear recommendation for third-line chemotherapy for small cell lung cancer （SCLC）, its efficacy is unknown. To date, there have rarely been reports of Chinese patients with SCLC w...Objective As there is currently no clear recommendation for third-line chemotherapy for small cell lung cancer （SCLC）, its efficacy is unknown. To date, there have rarely been reports of Chinese patients with SCLC who received third-line chemotherapy. Therefore, we investigated the efficacy, safety, and prognostic factors of Chinese patients with SCLC treated with third-line chemotherapy. Methods A retrospective analysis of patients with SCLC who received third-line chemotherapy was performed. Results Between 2007 and 2013, 62 patients [62 men （75.6%）, 20 women （24.4%）; median age at the time of diagnosis, 55 years] received third-line chemotherapy at our center. Of these patients, 44 had limited-stage disease and 38 had extensive-stage disease. On third-line chemotherapy, 55 （67.1%） patients had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status （ECOG PS） of 0-1, objective response rate of 15.9%, and median overall survival after third-line chemotherapy （OS-3） and median progres- sion-free survival after third-line chemotherapy （PFS-3） of 5.6 months and 3.0 months, respectively. On univariate analysis, PFS-3 was significantly related with ECOG PS （P = 0.005）, response to second-line chemotherapy （P = 0.002）, response to third-line chemotherapy （P 〈 0.001）, and PFS after second-line chemotherapy （P = 0.026）. OS-3 was significantly related with ECOG PS （P 〈 0.001）, response to third-line chemotherapy （P = 0.033）, PFS after first-line therapy （P = 0.044）, and PFS after second-line therapy （PFS-2） （P = 0.007）. On multivariate analysis, ECOG PS （P = 0.008） and response to third-line chemotherapy （P = 0.046） were independent prognostic factors for PFS-3, while ECOG PS （P = 0.007） and PFS-2 （P 〈 0.001） were independent prognostic factors for OS-3. Conclusion Few patients with SCLC receive third-line chemotherapy. Our findings suggest that patients with an ECOG PS 0-1 and PFS-2 for 〉3 months will be benefit from third-line chemotherapy, which should be actively offered to them.展开更多
文摘H pylori gastric infection is one of the most prevalent infectious diseases worldwide. The discovery that most upper gastrointestinal diseases are related to Hpylori infection and therefore can be treated with antibiotics is an important medical advance. Currently, a first-line triple therapy based on proton pump inhibitor （PPI） or ranitidine bismuth citrate （RBC） plus two antibiotics （darithromycin and amoxicillin or nitroimidazole） is recommended by all consensus conferences and guidelines. Even with the correct use of this drug combination, infection can not be eradicated in up to 23% of patients. Therefore, several second line therapies have been recommended. A 7 d quadruple therapy based on PPI, bismuth, tetracycline and metronidazole is the more frequently accepted. However, with second-line therapy, bacterial eradication may fail in up to 40% of cases. When Hpylori eradication is striclly indicated the choice of further treatment is controversial. Currently, a standard third-line therapy is lacking and various protocols have been proposed. Even after two consecutive failures, the most recent literature data have demonsbated that Hpylori eradication can be achieved in almost all patients, even when antibiotic susceptibility is not tested. Different possibilities of empirical treatment exist and the available third-line strategies are herein reviewed.
文摘BACKGROUND Due to increasing resistance rates of Helicobacter pylori(H.pylori)to different antibiotics,failures in eradication therapies are becoming more frequent.Even though eradication criteria and treatment algorithms for first-line and second-line therapy against H.pylori infection are well-established,there is no clear recommendation for third-line and rescue therapy in refractory H.pylori infection.AIM To perform a systematic review evaluating the efficacy and safety of rescue therapies against refractory H.pylori infection.METHODS A systematic search of available rescue treatments for refractory H.pylori infection was conducted on the National Library of Medicine’s PubMed search platform based on Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines.Randomized or non-randomized clinical trials and observational studies evaluating the effectiveness of H.pylori infection rescue therapies were included.RESULTS Twenty-eight studies were included in the analysis of mean eradication rates as rescue therapy,and 21 of these were selected for analysis of mean eradication rate as third-line treatment.For rifabutin-,sitafloxacin-,levofloxacin-,or metronidazole-based triple-therapy as third-line treatment,mean eradication rates of 81.6%and 84.4%,79.4%and 81.5%,55.7%and 60.6%,and 62.0%and 63.0%were found in intention-to-treat(ITT)and per-protocol(PP)analysis,respectively.For third-line quadruple therapy,mean eradication rates of 69.2%and 72.1%were found for bismuth quadruple therapy(BQT),88.9%and 90.9%for bismuth quadruple therapy,three-in-one,Pylera®(BQT-Pylera),and 61.3%and 64.2%for non-BQT)in ITT and PP analysis,respectively.For rifabutin-,sitafloxacin-,levofloxacin-,or metronidazole-based triple therapy as rescue therapy,mean eradication rates of 75.4%and 78.8%,79.4 and 81.5%,55.7%and 60.6%,and 62.0%and 63.0%were found in ITT and PP analysis,respectively.For quadruple therapy as rescue treatment,mean eradication rates of 76.7%and 79.2%for BQT,84.9%and 87.8%for BQT-Pylera,and 61.3%and 64.2%for non-BQT were found in ITT and PP analysis,respectively.For susceptibility-guided therapy,mean eradication rates as third-line and rescue treatment were 75.0%in ITT and 79.2%in PP analysis.CONCLUSION We recommend sitafloxacin-based triple therapy containing vonoprazan in regions with low macrolide resistance profile.In regions with known resistance to macrolides or unavailability of bismuth,rifabutin-based triple therapy is recommended.
基金Supported by grants from the Jilin Health and Family Planning Commission Scientific Research Project(No.2014Z014)the "12th Five" Project of National Key Subject of New Drug Innovation(No.2013ZX09104001)
文摘Objective As there is currently no clear recommendation for third-line chemotherapy for small cell lung cancer （SCLC）, its efficacy is unknown. To date, there have rarely been reports of Chinese patients with SCLC who received third-line chemotherapy. Therefore, we investigated the efficacy, safety, and prognostic factors of Chinese patients with SCLC treated with third-line chemotherapy. Methods A retrospective analysis of patients with SCLC who received third-line chemotherapy was performed. Results Between 2007 and 2013, 62 patients [62 men （75.6%）, 20 women （24.4%）; median age at the time of diagnosis, 55 years] received third-line chemotherapy at our center. Of these patients, 44 had limited-stage disease and 38 had extensive-stage disease. On third-line chemotherapy, 55 （67.1%） patients had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status （ECOG PS） of 0-1, objective response rate of 15.9%, and median overall survival after third-line chemotherapy （OS-3） and median progres- sion-free survival after third-line chemotherapy （PFS-3） of 5.6 months and 3.0 months, respectively. On univariate analysis, PFS-3 was significantly related with ECOG PS （P = 0.005）, response to second-line chemotherapy （P = 0.002）, response to third-line chemotherapy （P 〈 0.001）, and PFS after second-line chemotherapy （P = 0.026）. OS-3 was significantly related with ECOG PS （P 〈 0.001）, response to third-line chemotherapy （P = 0.033）, PFS after first-line therapy （P = 0.044）, and PFS after second-line therapy （PFS-2） （P = 0.007）. On multivariate analysis, ECOG PS （P = 0.008） and response to third-line chemotherapy （P = 0.046） were independent prognostic factors for PFS-3, while ECOG PS （P = 0.007） and PFS-2 （P 〈 0.001） were independent prognostic factors for OS-3. Conclusion Few patients with SCLC receive third-line chemotherapy. Our findings suggest that patients with an ECOG PS 0-1 and PFS-2 for 〉3 months will be benefit from third-line chemotherapy, which should be actively offered to them.
