Islands have come to be seen as a distinct object of disaster risk and climate change policy and research.This is reflected in the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015–2030(SFDRR),which specifies Small I...Islands have come to be seen as a distinct object of disaster risk and climate change policy and research.This is reflected in the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015–2030(SFDRR),which specifies Small Island Developing States(SIDS)as in need of specialized policies,attention,and support.This article directs an island studies perspective toward the SFDRR,discussing obstacles to the framework’s implementation in island contexts.Focus is placed on two interrelated sets of issues:(1)problematic aspects of the concepts of“development”as it is applied to islands(particularly in the SIDS category);and(2)international cooperation,militarism,and geopolitics.The study found that although island societies can benefit from the attention brought to them by the SFDRR,the framework engages in rhetoric that may limit island possibilities and potentials while distracting from more fundamental changes that should be made by other state and non-state actors.展开更多
从住房供应结构(Structure of Housing Provision)的理论视角出发,基于广深两城实践,着重论述中国大城市保障房供应的两种结构,即"政府主导"(大规模建设模式)和"政企联合"(配建模式)。不同的供应结构,根植于不同阶...从住房供应结构(Structure of Housing Provision)的理论视角出发,基于广深两城实践,着重论述中国大城市保障房供应的两种结构,即"政府主导"(大规模建设模式)和"政企联合"(配建模式)。不同的供应结构,根植于不同阶段的社会经济及城市发展背景,其本质为不同行动主体由于资源动员能力的差异而联合起来以实现保障房供应。"政府主导"的大规模建设模式盛行于"十二五"期间,主要受自上而下的中央政府压力以及城市扩张期郊区建设用地的相对可获得性所驱动。在"后‘十二五’"时期,一方面大城市发展阶段逐渐由增量扩张转向存量更新,新增建设用地受限,而存量用地更新涉及复杂的利益主体和高昂成本,在此情景下"企业化"的政府无法"独自"实现保障房供应;与此同时,大城市的保障房需求日益高涨,实现保障房供应的主体多元化(特别是开发商)是形势所需,"政企联合"的配建模式成为典型。展开更多
基金supported by the Guangdong Planning Office of Philosophy and Social Science under Grant No.GD24LN11the National Social Science Fund of China under Grant No.21&ZD274.
文摘Islands have come to be seen as a distinct object of disaster risk and climate change policy and research.This is reflected in the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015–2030(SFDRR),which specifies Small Island Developing States(SIDS)as in need of specialized policies,attention,and support.This article directs an island studies perspective toward the SFDRR,discussing obstacles to the framework’s implementation in island contexts.Focus is placed on two interrelated sets of issues:(1)problematic aspects of the concepts of“development”as it is applied to islands(particularly in the SIDS category);and(2)international cooperation,militarism,and geopolitics.The study found that although island societies can benefit from the attention brought to them by the SFDRR,the framework engages in rhetoric that may limit island possibilities and potentials while distracting from more fundamental changes that should be made by other state and non-state actors.
文摘从住房供应结构(Structure of Housing Provision)的理论视角出发,基于广深两城实践,着重论述中国大城市保障房供应的两种结构,即"政府主导"(大规模建设模式)和"政企联合"(配建模式)。不同的供应结构,根植于不同阶段的社会经济及城市发展背景,其本质为不同行动主体由于资源动员能力的差异而联合起来以实现保障房供应。"政府主导"的大规模建设模式盛行于"十二五"期间,主要受自上而下的中央政府压力以及城市扩张期郊区建设用地的相对可获得性所驱动。在"后‘十二五’"时期,一方面大城市发展阶段逐渐由增量扩张转向存量更新,新增建设用地受限,而存量用地更新涉及复杂的利益主体和高昂成本,在此情景下"企业化"的政府无法"独自"实现保障房供应;与此同时,大城市的保障房需求日益高涨,实现保障房供应的主体多元化(特别是开发商)是形势所需,"政企联合"的配建模式成为典型。
