At present, there are some concerns and problems to treat neurointensive care patients by using analgesics and sedatives. Conditions of neurointensive care patients change quickly. For neurointensive care patients who...At present, there are some concerns and problems to treat neurointensive care patients by using analgesics and sedatives. Conditions of neurointensive care patients change quickly. For neurointensive care patients who cannot have auxiliary examination timely, clinicians judge intracranial conditions mainly through relevant monitoring devices and consciousness and pupil changes of patients. The use of analgesics and sedatives is limited due to worry about influences on consciousness evaluation and judgment and different degrees of inhibition on cardiovascular system and respiratory system. Common sedatives (e.g. benzodiazepines) and common analgesics (e.g. morphine, fentanyl and sufentanil) both may inhibit respiration. The specification often provides taboos for the use of drugs by patients with increase intracranial pressure (ICP) and craniocerebral injuries. Through literature review, the author analyzed influences of analgesics and sedatives on ICP of neurointensive care patients comprehensively.展开更多
Aim. To statistic the usage of hypnotics and sedatives in outpatient and emergency clinics prescriptions in one day. Method. Check all prescriptions on April 29, 1987 and November 13, 1995 in order to know the quantit...Aim. To statistic the usage of hypnotics and sedatives in outpatient and emergency clinics prescriptions in one day. Method. Check all prescriptions on April 29, 1987 and November 13, 1995 in order to know the quantity, kind and distribution of hypnotics and sedatives in different outpatient departments. Result. There were 1 319 prescriptions on April 29, 1987. Among them, hypnotics and sedatives were 122(9. 24%); in comparing with 2 065 prescriptions on November 13, 1995, hypnotics and sedatives were 141 (6. 82%). Benzodiazepine used more than 80% in all prescriptions. Conclusion. The possibility of long-term low-dosage using benzodiazepine is present. It must strengthen the control and education to avoid the drug-abuse.展开更多
BACKGROUND Although critically ill pediatric patients can benefit from the use of sedation,it can cause side effects and even iatrogenic complications.Since pediatric patients cannot adequately express the intensity o...BACKGROUND Although critically ill pediatric patients can benefit from the use of sedation,it can cause side effects and even iatrogenic complications.Since pediatric patients cannot adequately express the intensity or location of the pain,discriminating the cause of their irritability and agitation can be more complicated than in adults.Thus,sedation therapy for children requires more careful attention.AIM To evaluate the association of the internal parental care protocol and the reduction in pediatric intensive care unit(PICU)postoperatively.METHODS This retrospective cohort study was carried out in the PICU of the tertiary medical center in Kazakhstan.The internal parental care protocol was developed and implemented by critical care team.During the pandemic,restrictions were also placed on parental presence in the PICU.We compare two groups:During restriction and after return to normal.The level of agitation was evaluated using the Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale.Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to examine associations of parental care with sedation therapy.RESULTS A total of 289 patients were included in the study.Of them,167 patients were hospitalized during and 122 after the restrictions of parental care.In multivariate analysis,parental care was associated with lower odds of prescribing diazepam(odds ratio=0.11,95%confidence interval:0.05-0.25),controlling for age,sex,cerebral palsy,and type of surgery.CONCLUSION The results of this study show that parental care was associated only with decreased odds of prescribing sedative drugs,while no differences were observed for analgesics.展开更多
OBJECTIVE: To present a bibliometric analysis of global scientific publications on the nondrug and nonsedative hypnotic treatment of insomnia with regard to influential institutions, publications, countries, research ...OBJECTIVE: To present a bibliometric analysis of global scientific publications on the nondrug and nonsedative hypnotic treatment of insomnia with regard to influential institutions, publications, countries, research hotspots,trends, and frontiers. METHODS: A literature review was conducted by searching the Web of Science Core Collection(Wo SCC) and China National Knowledge Infrastructure(CNKI) databases to identify all publications related to the nondrug and nonsedative hypnotic treatment of insomnia from 2000 to 2021. Eligible publications were reviewed, including annual publication increments, citation analyses, international collaborations, and keyword analyses. The data were analysed using Cite Space(vers5.8.R3, 6.1.R2 and 6.1.6, College of Computing and Informatics, Philadelphia, PA, USA) and virtualized by knowledge maps. RESULTS:In total, 9832 publications were included in this analysis. The results from the WoSCC showed that the United States of America(Count = 2268, 40.33%), Stanford University(Count = 141, 2.51%), and the United States Department of Health and Human Services were the leading country, institute, and funding agency regarding the number of publications, respectively. “Cognitive-behavioural therapy” was the most popular research topic generated from the cocited reference. The most frequently co-occurring keywords were insomnia, cognitive behavioural therapy, disorder, depression, quality of life, Meta-analysis, older adult, sleep, prevalence and efficacy, while keywords including clinical practice guideline, guideline, and Tai Chi remained popular after 2021. Circadian rhythm was the strongest research frontier for 2000-2021. In China, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine(Count = 69, 4.79%) was the most productive institute in this field. The most frequently co-occurring keywords from Chinese literature were sleep disorder, sleep quality, acupuncture and moxibustion, Parkinson's disease, transcranial magnetic stimulation, health education, music therapy, chronic insomnia, quality of life, and nonmotor symptoms. Traditional Chinese medicine was the strongest research frontier for 2019-2021. CONCLUSION: This bibliometric study provides an exhaustive mapping encompassing pertinent institute, publications, influential articles, researchers and topics of the global trend of nondrug and nonsedative hypnotic treatment for insomnia. The results show that the research trend has shifted from primary studies on the efficacy and safety of nondrug and nonsedative hypnotic treatment for insomnia to comorbidity studies. Clinical practice guidelines will potentially become the research frontier for this field post-2021. The findings are important for researchers, clinicians, journal editors, and policymakers working in the field of nondrug and nonsedative hypnotic treatment for insomnia to understand the strengths and potentials in the current studies and guide future clinical practice, research, and science policy.展开更多
文摘At present, there are some concerns and problems to treat neurointensive care patients by using analgesics and sedatives. Conditions of neurointensive care patients change quickly. For neurointensive care patients who cannot have auxiliary examination timely, clinicians judge intracranial conditions mainly through relevant monitoring devices and consciousness and pupil changes of patients. The use of analgesics and sedatives is limited due to worry about influences on consciousness evaluation and judgment and different degrees of inhibition on cardiovascular system and respiratory system. Common sedatives (e.g. benzodiazepines) and common analgesics (e.g. morphine, fentanyl and sufentanil) both may inhibit respiration. The specification often provides taboos for the use of drugs by patients with increase intracranial pressure (ICP) and craniocerebral injuries. Through literature review, the author analyzed influences of analgesics and sedatives on ICP of neurointensive care patients comprehensively.
文摘Aim. To statistic the usage of hypnotics and sedatives in outpatient and emergency clinics prescriptions in one day. Method. Check all prescriptions on April 29, 1987 and November 13, 1995 in order to know the quantity, kind and distribution of hypnotics and sedatives in different outpatient departments. Result. There were 1 319 prescriptions on April 29, 1987. Among them, hypnotics and sedatives were 122(9. 24%); in comparing with 2 065 prescriptions on November 13, 1995, hypnotics and sedatives were 141 (6. 82%). Benzodiazepine used more than 80% in all prescriptions. Conclusion. The possibility of long-term low-dosage using benzodiazepine is present. It must strengthen the control and education to avoid the drug-abuse.
文摘BACKGROUND Although critically ill pediatric patients can benefit from the use of sedation,it can cause side effects and even iatrogenic complications.Since pediatric patients cannot adequately express the intensity or location of the pain,discriminating the cause of their irritability and agitation can be more complicated than in adults.Thus,sedation therapy for children requires more careful attention.AIM To evaluate the association of the internal parental care protocol and the reduction in pediatric intensive care unit(PICU)postoperatively.METHODS This retrospective cohort study was carried out in the PICU of the tertiary medical center in Kazakhstan.The internal parental care protocol was developed and implemented by critical care team.During the pandemic,restrictions were also placed on parental presence in the PICU.We compare two groups:During restriction and after return to normal.The level of agitation was evaluated using the Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale.Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to examine associations of parental care with sedation therapy.RESULTS A total of 289 patients were included in the study.Of them,167 patients were hospitalized during and 122 after the restrictions of parental care.In multivariate analysis,parental care was associated with lower odds of prescribing diazepam(odds ratio=0.11,95%confidence interval:0.05-0.25),controlling for age,sex,cerebral palsy,and type of surgery.CONCLUSION The results of this study show that parental care was associated only with decreased odds of prescribing sedative drugs,while no differences were observed for analgesics.
基金National Natural Science Foundation of China:Research on Acupoint Sensitization (No. 81590950)Clinical Research on the Phenomena and Patterns of Acupoint Sensitization (No. 81590951)the Key R&D Program of Science and Technology Department of Sichuan Province:Research on the Molecular Mechanism of Specific Acupoint Sensitization in Coronary Heart Disease Angina Pectoris Model Rats Based on Exosome Regulation (No. 20ZDYF1199)。
文摘OBJECTIVE: To present a bibliometric analysis of global scientific publications on the nondrug and nonsedative hypnotic treatment of insomnia with regard to influential institutions, publications, countries, research hotspots,trends, and frontiers. METHODS: A literature review was conducted by searching the Web of Science Core Collection(Wo SCC) and China National Knowledge Infrastructure(CNKI) databases to identify all publications related to the nondrug and nonsedative hypnotic treatment of insomnia from 2000 to 2021. Eligible publications were reviewed, including annual publication increments, citation analyses, international collaborations, and keyword analyses. The data were analysed using Cite Space(vers5.8.R3, 6.1.R2 and 6.1.6, College of Computing and Informatics, Philadelphia, PA, USA) and virtualized by knowledge maps. RESULTS:In total, 9832 publications were included in this analysis. The results from the WoSCC showed that the United States of America(Count = 2268, 40.33%), Stanford University(Count = 141, 2.51%), and the United States Department of Health and Human Services were the leading country, institute, and funding agency regarding the number of publications, respectively. “Cognitive-behavioural therapy” was the most popular research topic generated from the cocited reference. The most frequently co-occurring keywords were insomnia, cognitive behavioural therapy, disorder, depression, quality of life, Meta-analysis, older adult, sleep, prevalence and efficacy, while keywords including clinical practice guideline, guideline, and Tai Chi remained popular after 2021. Circadian rhythm was the strongest research frontier for 2000-2021. In China, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine(Count = 69, 4.79%) was the most productive institute in this field. The most frequently co-occurring keywords from Chinese literature were sleep disorder, sleep quality, acupuncture and moxibustion, Parkinson's disease, transcranial magnetic stimulation, health education, music therapy, chronic insomnia, quality of life, and nonmotor symptoms. Traditional Chinese medicine was the strongest research frontier for 2019-2021. CONCLUSION: This bibliometric study provides an exhaustive mapping encompassing pertinent institute, publications, influential articles, researchers and topics of the global trend of nondrug and nonsedative hypnotic treatment for insomnia. The results show that the research trend has shifted from primary studies on the efficacy and safety of nondrug and nonsedative hypnotic treatment for insomnia to comorbidity studies. Clinical practice guidelines will potentially become the research frontier for this field post-2021. The findings are important for researchers, clinicians, journal editors, and policymakers working in the field of nondrug and nonsedative hypnotic treatment for insomnia to understand the strengths and potentials in the current studies and guide future clinical practice, research, and science policy.
