BACKGROUND Living donor kidney transplantation is the optimal method of long-term renal replacement therapy.Minimally invasive donor nephrectomy techniques,such as robot-assisted(RALDN)and hand-assisted(HALDN)laparosc...BACKGROUND Living donor kidney transplantation is the optimal method of long-term renal replacement therapy.Minimally invasive donor nephrectomy techniques,such as robot-assisted(RALDN)and hand-assisted(HALDN)laparoscopic procedures,are well-established in high-income countries and are being increasingly adopted worldwide.Nevertheless,no studies have reported surgical outcomes of RALDN donor nephrectomy from a United Kingdom center to date.AIM To compare surgical outcomes between RALDN and HALDN laparoscopic donor nephrectomy in a United Kingdom high-volume living kidney donor transplant program.METHODS A case-control matching analysis was performed based on the following parameters:Sex,age,body mass index,procedure laterality,number of renal arteries,and previous abdominal surgeries.Key surgical outcomes,including primary warm ischemia time,operative duration,and post-operative recovery,were evaluated.RESULTS In this cohort of 140 living donors(70 RALDN vs 70 HALDN),donor and recipient outcomes were equivalent across key metrics:Pain scores,overall complication rates,readmissions,reoperations,and creatinine levels at 30 days and 1 year.Recipient long-term renal function did not differ between groups.Operative time for RALDN decreased significantly over the study period,indicating progressive improvement along the learning curve.Although RALDN was associated with a modestly longer mean warm ischaemia time(3.53 minutes vs 2.76 minutes,P<0.001)and extended hospital stay(4.21 days vs 3.17 days,P<0.001),these did not translate into any disadvantage in clinical outcomes.CONCLUSION In this first United Kingdom comparative cohort,RALDN demonstrated excellent safety and efficacy,even in the early phase of our programme,matching the outcomes of the well-established,gold-standard HALDN approach.Moreover,the pronounced learning-curve trajectory suggests considerable potential for further improvements in robotic surgical outcomes as the programme matures.展开更多
Urinary incontinence is a common complication following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy(RARP).Urethral length has been identified as a factor affecting postoperative continence recovery.In this meta-analysis,we e...Urinary incontinence is a common complication following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy(RARP).Urethral length has been identified as a factor affecting postoperative continence recovery.In this meta-analysis,we examined the association between use of the maximal urethral length preservation(MULP)technique and postoperative urinary continence in patients undergoing RARP.We conducted a comprehensive search of PubMed,Web of Science,Embase,and the Cochrane Library up to December 31,2023.The quality of the literature was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.A random-effects meta-analysis was performed to synthesize data and calculate the odds ratio(OR)from eligible studies on continence and MULP.Six studies involving 1869 patients met the eligibility criteria.MULP was positively associated with both early continence(1 month after RARP;Z=3.62,P=0.003,OR=3.10,95% confidence interval[CI]:1.68-5.73)and late continence(12 months after RARP;Z=2.34,P=0.019,OR=2.10,95%CI:1.13–3.90).Oncological outcomes indicated that MULP did not increase the overall positive surgical margin rate or the positive surgical margin status at the prostate apex(both P>0.05).In conclusion,the use of the MULP technique in RARP significantly improved both early and late postoperative continence outcomes without compromising oncological outcomes.展开更多
Objective:Radical prostatectomy(RP)is considered the gold standard treatment for patients with localized prostate cancer(PCa).All patients undergoing RP,either open,laparoscopic,or robotic,are at risk of developing ur...Objective:Radical prostatectomy(RP)is considered the gold standard treatment for patients with localized prostate cancer(PCa).All patients undergoing RP,either open,laparoscopic,or robotic,are at risk of developing urinary incontinence after RP.Our study aimed to analyze possible predictors of early postoperative(within 3 months)urinary continence(UC)outcomes following extraperitoneal single-site robot-assisted RP(ss-RARP)for localized PCa.Methods:We retrospectively reviewed data from 113 patients with localized PCa who were operated on by a highly experienced surgeon between September 2022 and December 2023.Patient characteristics(age,body mass index,prostate volume,prostate dimensions,preoperative and postoperative membranous urethral length,and percentage of membranous urethra removed)were analyzed using logistic regression to determine the independent factors contributing to short-term UC recovery after extraperitoneal ss-RARP.From the time of urinary catheter removal after surgery,the recovery of UC was followed up every month,and UC was defined as using≤1 safety pad daily,known as social continence.Results:The proportions of continent patients immediately after urinary catheter removal,1 month,and 3 months after extraperitoneal ss-RARP were 22%,49%,and 82%,respectively.The multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the percentage of membranous urethra removed(p=0.016)and prostate volume(p=0.049)were associated with social UC recovery immediately after urinary catheter removal,and craniocaudal dimension of the prostate(p=0.042)and age(p=0.014)were associated with social UC recovery 1 month and 3 months after extraperitoneal ss-RARP,respectively.Conclusion:The percentage of membranous urethra removed,prostate volume,craniocaudal dimension of the prostate,and age are independent risk factors for social UC early after extraperitoneal ss-RARP.展开更多
Background:Dorsal approach is the potentially effective strategy for minimally invasive liver resection.This study aimed to compare the outcomes between robot-assisted and laparoscopic hemihepatectomy through dorsal a...Background:Dorsal approach is the potentially effective strategy for minimally invasive liver resection.This study aimed to compare the outcomes between robot-assisted and laparoscopic hemihepatectomy through dorsal approach.Methods:We compared the patients who underwent robot-assisted hemihepatectomy(Rob-HH)and who had laparoscopic hemihepatectomy(Lap-HH)through dorsal approach between January 2020 and December 2022.A 1:1 propensity score-matching(PSM)analysis was performed to minimize bias and confounding factors.Results:Ninety-six patients were included,41 with Rob-HH and 55 with Lap-HH.Among them,58 underwent left hemihepatectomy(LHH)and 38 underwent right hemihepatectomy(RHH).Compared with LapHH group,patients with Rob-HH had less estimated blood loss(median:100.0 vs.300.0 m L,P=0.016),lower blood transfusion rates(4.9%vs.29.1%,P=0.003)and postoperative complication rates(26.8%vs.54.5%,P=0.016).These significant differences consistently existed after PSM and in the LHH subgroups.Furthermore,robot-assisted LHH was associated with decreased Pringle duration(45 vs.60 min,P=0.047).RHH subgroup analysis showed that compared with Lap-RHH,Rob-RHH was associated with less estimated blood loss(200.0 vs.400.0 m L,P=0.013).No significant differences were found in other perioperative outcomes among pre-and post-PSM cohorts,such as Pringle duration,operative time,and hospital stay.Conclusions:The dorsal approach was a safe and feasible strategy for hemi-hepatectomy with favorable outcomes under robot-assisted system in reducing intraoperative blood loss,transfusion,and postoperative complications.展开更多
Objective:To evaluate the feasibility and safety of laparoendoscopic single-site robot-assisted nephroureterectomy(LESS-RANU)by comparing perioperative,pathological,and oncological results with the conventional multip...Objective:To evaluate the feasibility and safety of laparoendoscopic single-site robot-assisted nephroureterectomy(LESS-RANU)by comparing perioperative,pathological,and oncological results with the conventional multiport laparoendoscopic approach in the retroperitoneal approach for the management of urinary tract urothelial carcinoma.Methods:Between January 2021 and October 2024,our center treated 56 patients with urinary tract urothelial carcinoma using either the LESS-RANU(n�31)or the conventional multi-port laparoscopic nephroureterectomy(LNU)(n�25)via the retroperitoneal approach.Data including demographic,perioperative,pathological,and oncological characteristics were collected.Results:No significant differences were found in patient demographics and tumor characteristics between the two groups.No serious intraoperative complications occurred in both groups.The mean operation time,skin incision length,Visual Analog Scale pain scores,time for repositioning and follow-up duration for the LESS-RANU group and the LNU group were 138.23 min and 180.40 min,6.48 cm and 15.40 cm,3.23 and 4.60,5.71 min and 30.24 min,and 10.84 months and 22.88 months,respectively(p<0.001).There were no significant differences in other perioperative data between the two groups.Multiple linear regression identified an association of body mass index with operation time in the LESS-RANU group(p<0.001).The mean operative time of the subsequent 15 patients was significantly lower than that of the initial 16 patients(130.33 min vs.145.31 min,p=0.044).There were no significant differences in the pathological characteristics between the two groups.Recurrences developed in four patients:one in the LESS-RANU group and three in the LNU group.-Conclusion:LESS-RANU is safe and more effective compared to LNU via the retroperitoneal approach,especially for patients with low body mass index.展开更多
Objective:We investigated patients who underwent robot-assisted radical prostatectomy(RARP)with pelvic lymph node dissection(PLND),analyzing the prevalence and risk factors associated with symptomatic lymphoceles(SLCs...Objective:We investigated patients who underwent robot-assisted radical prostatectomy(RARP)with pelvic lymph node dissection(PLND),analyzing the prevalence and risk factors associated with symptomatic lymphoceles(SLCs).Methods:We evaluated 354 consecutive patients who underwent RARP with PLND by our team between June 2016 and December 2022.After analyzing the prevalence of SLCs,patients were divided into two groups,with and without SLCs.The variables were age,body mass index(BMI),prostate-specific antigen,surgery time,blood loss,length of stay,International Society of Urological Pathology score in the pathology,and the number of lymph nodes removed.These variables were compared between these groups using the Chi-square test and Student's t-test,according to the type of the variable.In all analyses,a significance level of<0.05 was considered.Results:The prevalence of SLCs in this sample of patients undergoing RARP with PLND was 2.0%(7/354),which is slightly lower than the minimum rate reported in the literature.In our analysis,BMI(p=0.041),the number of lymph nodes removed(p=0.007),and length of hospital stay(p=0.007)were factors associated with the presence of SLCs.Conclusion:The prevalence of SLCs in patients undergoing RARP with PLND is approximately 2.0%.Higher BMI,greater number of lymph nodes removed,and longer length of hospital stay are factors associated with the presence of SLCs.展开更多
Objective:Robot-assisted simple prostatectomy(RASP)is increasingly used as a surgical treatment option for large benign prostatic hyperplasia(BPH)(>80 mL).However,there is no sufficient expert consensus or guidelin...Objective:Robot-assisted simple prostatectomy(RASP)is increasingly used as a surgical treatment option for large benign prostatic hyperplasia(BPH)(>80 mL).However,there is no sufficient expert consensus or guidelines to guide clinical practice.We aimed to obtain expert opinions for RASP for large BPH.Methods:A systematic review of the literature was performed in April 2024 using the PubMed,Embase,and Web of Science databases.Search terms were combined to construct the following search strings:(robotic)AND(simple OR benign)AND(prostatectomy).Search results were filtered by language(English only),species(human),and publication type(original article).This study used a two-phase modified Delphi approach.Results:In this expert consensus,some frequently used RASP techniques,including robot-assisted retropubic prostatectomy,robot-assisted transvesical prostatectomy,and robot-assisted urethra-sparing prostatectomy,are described.RASP offers a short learning curve for surgeons with experience in robotic surgery.Severe complications are rare in patients who undergo RASP.Conclusion:RASP technique can be recommended as a safe and effective minimally invasive treatment for symptomatic BPH patients with large prostate glands.展开更多
Objective:Since the introduction of the Da Vinci®robotic system,robot-assisted colon resection has gained popularity because of its the potential technical advantages.Recently,two new CE-marked platforms have bec...Objective:Since the introduction of the Da Vinci®robotic system,robot-assisted colon resection has gained popularity because of its the potential technical advantages.Recently,two new CE-marked platforms have become available in Europe:Hugo^(TM)RAS and Versius®.We present the firstprospective case series comparing these three robotic systems.Methods:This exploratory,prospective study enrolled 45 consecutive adult patients undergoing robotic colon resection between February and December 2024,as part of the COMPAR trial.Two experienced colorectal surgeons performed all procedures across two surgical units.Each robotic platform was used in 15 cases.The primary outcomes were conversion to laparoscopy or open surgery and intra-operative complications.The secondary outcomes included post-operative recovery,oncological results,and platform-specifictechnical parameters.Results:The mean age was 66.8 years and 68.9%of patients underwent surgery for colon cancer.No conversions occurred in the Da Vinci group,whereas 2 and 3 conversions to laparoscopy were recorded with Hugo^(TM)RAS and Versius®,respectively.One intra-operative instrument malfunction occurred with Hugo^(TM)RAS,and one surgical complication was reported in each group.No significantdifferences emerged in post-operative recovery or oncological outcomes.Versius®cases required more frequent use of laparoscopic energy devices(p<0.001).Hugo^(TM)RAS was associated with a longer total operating room time(p=0.022)and longer incision length(p=0.005).Conclusion:Robotic colorectal surgery with all three platforms is feasible when performed by expert surgeons.While early outcomes are encouraging,larger comparative trials are needed to confirmdifferences in recovery and oncological efficacy.展开更多
Subretinal injection is a complicated task for retinal surgeons to operate manually.In this paper we demonstrate a robust framework for needle detection and localisation in robotassisted subretinal injection using mic...Subretinal injection is a complicated task for retinal surgeons to operate manually.In this paper we demonstrate a robust framework for needle detection and localisation in robotassisted subretinal injection using microscope-integrated Optical Coherence Tomography with deep learning.Five convolutional neural networks with different architectures were evaluated.The main differences between the architectures are the amount of information they receive at the input layer.When evaluated on ex-vivo pig eyes,the top performing network successfully detected all needles in the dataset and localised them with an Intersection over Union value of 0.55.The algorithm was evaluated by comparing the depth of the top and bottom edge of the predicted bounding box to the ground truth.This analysis showed that the top edge can be used to predict the depth of the needle with a maximum error of 8.5μm.展开更多
Objective:Thulium fiber laser enucleation of the prostate(ThuFLEP)and robot-assisted simple prostatectomy(RASP)are two options for treating large benign prostatic hyperplasia.The most appropriate technique remains a m...Objective:Thulium fiber laser enucleation of the prostate(ThuFLEP)and robot-assisted simple prostatectomy(RASP)are two options for treating large benign prostatic hyperplasia.The most appropriate technique remains a matter of debate.We evaluated the efficacy and safety of ThuFLEP compared to RASP.Methods:Between January 2020 and December 2023,all patients who underwent either RASP or ThuFLEP for a prostate volume>80 mL were retrospectively included.The surgical procedure choice was left to the surgeon’s and patient’s discretion.Preoperative patient evaluation included the assessment of functional parameters.The groups were compared.Results:A total of 234 patients were included:106(45%)underwent RASP and 128(55%)underwent ThuFLEP.The mean operative time was shorter in the ThuFLEP group compared to the RASP group(106.4 with standard deviation[SD]46.1 min vs.123.2[SD 32.8]min,p=0.012).The mean lengths of catheterization and stay were significantly longer in the RASP group(5.0[SD 3.9]days vs.1.7[SD 2.0]days,p=0.009[catheterization]and 4.9[SD 3.0]days vs.1.9[SD 1.8]days,p=0.009[stay]).The overall complication rate was significantly higher in the ThuFLEP group(12%vs.2.8%in the RASP group,p=0.022).However,we did not observe significant differences in major complications(Clavien-Dindo≥3)between the two groups(four[3.1%]in the ThuFLEP group vs.one[0.94%]in the RASP group,p=0.073).At 3 months,the rate of stress urinary incontinence was 4.7%after ThuFLEP and 1.9%after RASP(p=0.2).Finally,the quality of life score and maximum urinary flow were comparable between the ThuFLEP and RASP groups,but the International Prostate Symptom Score at 3 months postoperatively was lower in the RASP group(p=0.012).Conclusion:Both ThuFLEP and RASP are safe techniques with comparable functional outcomes for large benign prostatic hyperplasia.ThuFLEP allows a reduction in catheterization and hospitalization durations but presents more complications compared to RASP.展开更多
Objective:To investigate the effects of robot-assisted training on upper limb function in elderly stroke patients.Methods:Seventy elderly stroke patients treated in the Rehabilitation Medicine Department of Jiangsu Pr...Objective:To investigate the effects of robot-assisted training on upper limb function in elderly stroke patients.Methods:Seventy elderly stroke patients treated in the Rehabilitation Medicine Department of Jiangsu Provincial Organ Hospital from January 2023 to December 2023 were randomly divided into an intervention group(n=35)and a control group(n=35).In addition to conventional rehabilitation and nursing care,both groups received 40 minutes of daily upper limb training.The control group underwent entirely manual training,whereas the intervention group received a combination of 20 minutes of manual and 20 minutes of robot-assisted training.All participants completed this protocol five times weekly for four weeks,with assessments of upper limb motor function and activities of daily living(ADL)conducted pre-and post-intervention.Results:After treatment,both groups showed significant increases in Fugl-Meyer Assessment(FMA-UE)and Barthel Index(BI)scores compared to before treatment(p<0.01).The intervention group had higher FMA-UE scores than the control group(p<0.05),while there was no significant difference in BI scores between the two groups after treatment(p>0.05).Conclusion:Robot-assisted training can improve upper limb motor function and enhance ADL capabilities in elderly stroke patients.展开更多
Robot-assisted surgery has evolved into a crucial treatment for prostate cancer(PCa).However,from its appearance to today,brain-computer interface,virtual reality,and metaverse have revolutionized the field of robot-a...Robot-assisted surgery has evolved into a crucial treatment for prostate cancer(PCa).However,from its appearance to today,brain-computer interface,virtual reality,and metaverse have revolutionized the field of robot-assisted surgery for PCa,presenting both opportunities and challenges.Especially in the context of contemporary big data and precision medicine,facing the heterogeneity of PCa and the complexity of clinical problems,it still needs to be continuously upgraded and improved.Keeping this in mind,this article summarized the 5 stages of the historical development of robot-assisted surgery for PCa,encompassing the stages of emergence,promotion,development,maturity,and intelligence.Initially,safety concerns were paramount,but subsequent research and engineering advancements have focused on enhancing device efficacy,surgical technology,and achieving precise multi modal treatment.The dominance of da Vinci robot-assisted surgical system has seen this evolution intimately tied to its successive versions.In the future,robot-assisted surgery for PCa will move towards intelligence,promising improved patient outcomes and personalized therapy,alongside formidable challenges.To guide future development,we propose 10 significant prospects spanning clinical,research,engineering,materials,social,and economic domains,envisioning a future era of artificial intelligence in the surgical treatment of PCa.展开更多
Background:Artificial intelligence(AI)-assisted threedimensional(3D)surgical platforms,integrated with augmented reality,have the potential to improve intraoperative anatomical recognition and provide surgeons with an...Background:Artificial intelligence(AI)-assisted threedimensional(3D)surgical platforms,integrated with augmented reality,have the potential to improve intraoperative anatomical recognition and provide surgeons with an immersive,dynamic operating environment during urooncological procedures.This review aims to examine the current applications of AI in robotic uro-oncology,with a particular focus on its role in facilitating intraoperative navigation during complex surgeries.Methods:A systematic literature search was performed across PubMed,the National Library of Medicine,MEDLINE,the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials(CENTRAL),ClinicalTrials.gov,and Google Scholar to identify relevant studies published up to July 2025.The search strategy incorporated a predefined set of keywords,including AI,machine learning,radical prostatectomy(RP),robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy(RARP),robotassisted partial nephrectomy(RAPN),and robot-assisted radical cystectomy(RARC).Only clinical trials,full-text peer-reviewed publications,and original research articles were included.Studies were eligible for inclusion if they evaluated or described applications of AI in RARP,RAPN,or RARC.Results:Technological advancements have substantially transformed the field of uro-oncologic surgery.In particular,AI and AI-assisted intraoperative navigation in RARP demonstrate considerable potential to objectively assess surgical performance and predict clinical outcomes.In RAPN,the adoption of preoperative,interactive 3D virtualmodels for surgical planning has influenced surgical decisions,thus,enhanced precision in resection planning correlates with superior nephron-sparing outcomes and optimized selective clamping.AI applications in RARC,techniques such as augmented reality(AR)can overlay critical information on the surgical field,by facilitating navigation through complex anatomical planes and enhancing identification of critical structures.Conclusion:AI appears to enhance robotic uro-oncologic procedures by increasing operative precision and supporting individualised surgical treatment strategies.展开更多
Background:The Da Vinci Single-Port Robotic System(Da Vinci-SP),introduced by Intuitive(CA,USA)in 2018 in the USA and in 2024 in Europe,integrates advanced features like a flexible camera and articulating instruments....Background:The Da Vinci Single-Port Robotic System(Da Vinci-SP),introduced by Intuitive(CA,USA)in 2018 in the USA and in 2024 in Europe,integrates advanced features like a flexible camera and articulating instruments.It has garnered significant interest in urology.Our report presents the first described European series of Radical Prostatectomies using the Da Vinci SP at the leading Italian center,Istituto Nazionale Tumori di Napoli,IRCCS“G.Pascale”Foundation,detailing the technical differences and challenges faced by experienced multiport robotic surgeons.Methods:Sixteen patients have been enrolled and underwent Single-Port(SP)Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy(SP-RARP).Baseline characteristics of the patients were collected.We provided a step-by-step description of the surgical technique.Oncological outcomes have been evaluated and compared with magnetic resonance imaging(MRI)and biopsy results.Intraoperative,perioperative,and postoperative complications,surgical outcomes,functional outcomes,and technical issues of the new system were also documented.Results:All surgeries were successfully performed without the need for conversion.An extraperitoneal approach was used for all patients.Median Console time was 110 min.No complications were reported.The estimated median blood loss was 175 cc.Discharge from the hospital was on the first post-operative day for all patients.Bladder catheter removal was on day 7 without the need for cystography.Conclusions:We presented the first European case series of SP-RARP,reporting our experience and confirming the procedure’s feasibility for a highly experienced robotic surgeon.Experience with an extraperitoneal approach using the multiport(MP)platform,combined with well-conducted training for the SP system,may facilitate the transition to SP surgery.Further procedures and studies are needed to evaluate the oncological and functional outcomes.展开更多
Radical gastrectomy with an adequate lymphadenectomy is the main procedure which makes it possible to cure patients with resectable gastric cancer (GC). A number of randomized controlled trials and meta-analysis provi...Radical gastrectomy with an adequate lymphadenectomy is the main procedure which makes it possible to cure patients with resectable gastric cancer (GC). A number of randomized controlled trials and meta-analysis provide phase III evidence that laparoscopic gastrectomy is technically safe and that it yields better short-term outcomes than conventional open gastrectomy for early-stage GC. While laparoscopic gastrectomy has become standard therapy for early-stage GC, especially in Asian countries such as Japan and South Korea, the use of minimally invasive techniques is still controversial for the treatment of more advanced tumours, principally due to existing concerns about its oncological adequacy and capacity to carry out an adequately extended lymphadenectomy. Some intrinsic drawbacks of the conventional laparoscopic technique have prevented the worldwide spread of laparoscopic gastrectomy for cancer and, despite technological advances in recent year, it remains a technically challenging procedure. The introduction of robotic surgery over the last ten years has implied a notable mutation of certain minimally invasive procedures, making it possible to overcome some limitations of the traditional laparoscopic technique. Robot-assisted gastric resection with D2 lymph node dissection has been shown to be safe and feasible in prospective and retrospective studies. However, to date there are no high quality comparative studies investigating the advantages of a robotic approach to GC over traditional laparoscopic and open gastrectomy. On the basis of the literature review here presented, robot-assisted surgery seems to fulfill oncologic criteria for D2 dissection and has a comparable oncologic outcome to traditional laparoscopic and open procedure. Robot-assisted gastrectomy was associated with the trend toward a shorter hospital stay with a comparable morbidity of conventional laparoscopic and open gastrectomy, but randomized clinical trials and longer follow-ups are needed to evaluate the possible influence of robot gastrectomy on GC patient survival.展开更多
AIM To evaluate the potential effectiveness of robot-assisted gastrectomy(RAG) in comparison to open gastrectomy(OG) for gastric cancer patients.METHODS A comprehensive systematic literature search using PubM ed,EMBAS...AIM To evaluate the potential effectiveness of robot-assisted gastrectomy(RAG) in comparison to open gastrectomy(OG) for gastric cancer patients.METHODS A comprehensive systematic literature search using PubM ed,EMBASE,and the Cochrane Library was carried out to identify studies comparing RAG and OG in gastric cancer.Participants of any age and sex were considered for inclusion in comparative studies of the two techniques independently from type of gastrectomy.A meta-analysis of short-term perioperative outcomes was performed to evaluate whether RAG is equivalent to OG.The primary outcome measures were set for estimated blood loss,operative time,conversion rate,morbidity,and hospital stay.Secondary among postoperative complications,wound infection,bleeding and anastomotic leakage were also analysed.RESULTS A total of 6 articles,5 retrospective and 1 randomized controlled study,involving 6123 patients overall,with 689(11.3%) cases submitted to RAG and 5434(88.7%) to OG,satisfied the eligibility criteria and were included in the meta-analysis.RAG was associated with longer operation time than OG(weighted mean difference 72.20 min;P < 0.001),but with reduction in blood loss and shorter hospital stay(weighted mean difference-166.83 mL and-1.97 d respectively;P < 0.001).No differences were found with respect to overall postoperative complications(P = 0.65),wound infection(P = 0.35),bleeding(P = 0.65),and anastomotic leakage(P = 0.06).The postoperative mortality rates were similar between the two groups.With respect to oncological outcomes,no statistical differences among the number of harvested lymph nodes were found(weighted mean difference-1.12;P = 0.10).CONCLUSION RAG seems to be a technically valid alternative to OG for performing radical gastrectomy in gastric cancer resulting in safe complications.展开更多
Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy （RARP） is a rapidly evolving technique for the treatment of localized prostate cancer. In the United States, over 65% of radical prostatectomies are robot-assisted, although the ...Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy （RARP） is a rapidly evolving technique for the treatment of localized prostate cancer. In the United States, over 65% of radical prostatectomies are robot-assisted, although the acceptance of this technology in Europe and the rest of the world has been somewhat slower. This article reviews the current literature on RARP with regard to oncological, continence and potency outcomes-the so-called ＇trifecta＇. Preliminary data appear to show an advantage of RARP over open prostatectomy, with reduced blood loss, decreased pain, early mobilization, shorter hospital stay and lower margin rates. Most studies show good postoperative continence and potency with RARP; however, this needs to be viewed in the context of the paucity of randomized data available in the literature. There is no definitive evidence to show an advantage over standard laparoscopy, but the fact that this technique has reached parity with laparoscopy within 5 years is encouraging. Finally, evolving techniques of single-port robotic prostatectomy, laser- guided robotics, catheter-free prostatectomy and image-guided robotics are discussed.展开更多
Needle insertion is a common surgical procedure used in diagnosis and treatment.The needle steering technologies make continuous developments in theoretical and practical aspects along with the in-depth research on ne...Needle insertion is a common surgical procedure used in diagnosis and treatment.The needle steering technologies make continuous developments in theoretical and practical aspects along with the in-depth research on needle insertion.It is necessary to summarize and analyze the existing results to promote the future development of theories and applications of needle insertion.Thus,a survey of the state of the art of research is presented on algorithms of needle steering techniques,the surgical robots and devices.Based on the analysis of the needle insertion procedure,the concept of needle steering is defined as a kinematics problem,which is to place the needle at the target and avoid the obstacles.The needle steering techniques,including the artificial potential field method and the nonholonomic model,are introduced to control the needles for improving the accuracy.Based on the quasi-static thinking,the virtual spring model and the cantilever-beam model are developed to calculate the amount of needle deflection and generate the needle path.The phantoms instead of the real tissue are used to verify the models mentioned in most of the experimentations.For the desired needle trajectories,the image-guided robotic devices and some novel needles are presented to achieve the needle steering.Finally,the challenges are provided involving the controllability of the long flexible needle and the properties of soft tissue.The results and investigations can be used for further study on the precision and accuracy of needle insertion.展开更多
Aim： To determine if robot-assisted varicocelectomy can be safely and effectively performed when compared to microscopic inguinal varicocelectomy. Methods： Eight patients aged 29.1 ± 12.5 years underwent micros...Aim： To determine if robot-assisted varicocelectomy can be safely and effectively performed when compared to microscopic inguinal varicocelectomy. Methods： Eight patients aged 29.1 ± 12.5 years underwent microscopic subinguinal varicocelectomies： seven patients with left-sided repair, and one patient with bilateral repair. Eight patients aged 22.0 ±8.0 years underwent robot-assisted varicocelectomies： seven patients with left-sided repair and one patient with bilateral repair. Results： The average operative time for microscopic inguinal varicocelectomy was 73.9 ±12.2 min, whereas the robot-assisted technique took 71.1± 21.1 min. There were no difficulties in identifying and isolating vessels and the vas deferens with robot-assisted subinguinal varicocelectomy. Hand tremor was eliminated using the robotic procedure. Patients who underwent either microscopic or robot-assisted varicocelectomies were able to resume daily activities on the day of surgery and full activities within 2 weeks. There were no complications or recurrences of varicocele. Conclusion： From our experience, compared to microscopic surgery, robot-assisted varicocelectomy can be safely and effectively performed, with the added benefit of eliminating hand tremor.展开更多
Vasectomy reversal （VR） has traditionally been performed with the operative microscope. Recently, robot assistance has been applied to VR. Retrospective chart review from a single VR center included men who underwen...Vasectomy reversal （VR） has traditionally been performed with the operative microscope. Recently, robot assistance has been applied to VR. Retrospective chart review from a single VR center included men who underwent either robot-assisted VR （RAVR） or microsurgical VR （MVR） by a single fellowship trained microsurgeon between 2011 and 2013 and had a 6 weeks postoperative semen analysis. Fifty-two men who were interested in VR were counseled and given the option of RAVR versus MVR. Twenty-seven men elected to have MVR while 25 men elected RAVR. These included vasovasostomies and vasoepididymostomies in both groups, as well as redo VRs in men who had failed previous VR attempts by other surgeons. There was no statistically significant difference between the microsurgical group and the robot-assisted group, respectively, in overall patency rates （89% vs 92%）, 6 weeks post-VR mean sperm concentrations （28 million m1-1 vs 26 million m1-1） or total motile counts （29 million vs 30 million）, or mean operative times （141 min vs 150 min）. There was a statistically significant difference in anastomosis time （64 min vs 74 min）, however, clinically this only represented a 10 min longer anastomosis time in the early robotic experience, which was found to be decreasing as the case series continued. Transitioning from MVR to RAVR is feasible with comparable outcomes.展开更多
文摘BACKGROUND Living donor kidney transplantation is the optimal method of long-term renal replacement therapy.Minimally invasive donor nephrectomy techniques,such as robot-assisted(RALDN)and hand-assisted(HALDN)laparoscopic procedures,are well-established in high-income countries and are being increasingly adopted worldwide.Nevertheless,no studies have reported surgical outcomes of RALDN donor nephrectomy from a United Kingdom center to date.AIM To compare surgical outcomes between RALDN and HALDN laparoscopic donor nephrectomy in a United Kingdom high-volume living kidney donor transplant program.METHODS A case-control matching analysis was performed based on the following parameters:Sex,age,body mass index,procedure laterality,number of renal arteries,and previous abdominal surgeries.Key surgical outcomes,including primary warm ischemia time,operative duration,and post-operative recovery,were evaluated.RESULTS In this cohort of 140 living donors(70 RALDN vs 70 HALDN),donor and recipient outcomes were equivalent across key metrics:Pain scores,overall complication rates,readmissions,reoperations,and creatinine levels at 30 days and 1 year.Recipient long-term renal function did not differ between groups.Operative time for RALDN decreased significantly over the study period,indicating progressive improvement along the learning curve.Although RALDN was associated with a modestly longer mean warm ischaemia time(3.53 minutes vs 2.76 minutes,P<0.001)and extended hospital stay(4.21 days vs 3.17 days,P<0.001),these did not translate into any disadvantage in clinical outcomes.CONCLUSION In this first United Kingdom comparative cohort,RALDN demonstrated excellent safety and efficacy,even in the early phase of our programme,matching the outcomes of the well-established,gold-standard HALDN approach.Moreover,the pronounced learning-curve trajectory suggests considerable potential for further improvements in robotic surgical outcomes as the programme matures.
基金supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(No.82170783).
文摘Urinary incontinence is a common complication following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy(RARP).Urethral length has been identified as a factor affecting postoperative continence recovery.In this meta-analysis,we examined the association between use of the maximal urethral length preservation(MULP)technique and postoperative urinary continence in patients undergoing RARP.We conducted a comprehensive search of PubMed,Web of Science,Embase,and the Cochrane Library up to December 31,2023.The quality of the literature was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.A random-effects meta-analysis was performed to synthesize data and calculate the odds ratio(OR)from eligible studies on continence and MULP.Six studies involving 1869 patients met the eligibility criteria.MULP was positively associated with both early continence(1 month after RARP;Z=3.62,P=0.003,OR=3.10,95% confidence interval[CI]:1.68-5.73)and late continence(12 months after RARP;Z=2.34,P=0.019,OR=2.10,95%CI:1.13–3.90).Oncological outcomes indicated that MULP did not increase the overall positive surgical margin rate or the positive surgical margin status at the prostate apex(both P>0.05).In conclusion,the use of the MULP technique in RARP significantly improved both early and late postoperative continence outcomes without compromising oncological outcomes.
文摘Objective:Radical prostatectomy(RP)is considered the gold standard treatment for patients with localized prostate cancer(PCa).All patients undergoing RP,either open,laparoscopic,or robotic,are at risk of developing urinary incontinence after RP.Our study aimed to analyze possible predictors of early postoperative(within 3 months)urinary continence(UC)outcomes following extraperitoneal single-site robot-assisted RP(ss-RARP)for localized PCa.Methods:We retrospectively reviewed data from 113 patients with localized PCa who were operated on by a highly experienced surgeon between September 2022 and December 2023.Patient characteristics(age,body mass index,prostate volume,prostate dimensions,preoperative and postoperative membranous urethral length,and percentage of membranous urethra removed)were analyzed using logistic regression to determine the independent factors contributing to short-term UC recovery after extraperitoneal ss-RARP.From the time of urinary catheter removal after surgery,the recovery of UC was followed up every month,and UC was defined as using≤1 safety pad daily,known as social continence.Results:The proportions of continent patients immediately after urinary catheter removal,1 month,and 3 months after extraperitoneal ss-RARP were 22%,49%,and 82%,respectively.The multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the percentage of membranous urethra removed(p=0.016)and prostate volume(p=0.049)were associated with social UC recovery immediately after urinary catheter removal,and craniocaudal dimension of the prostate(p=0.042)and age(p=0.014)were associated with social UC recovery 1 month and 3 months after extraperitoneal ss-RARP,respectively.Conclusion:The percentage of membranous urethra removed,prostate volume,craniocaudal dimension of the prostate,and age are independent risk factors for social UC early after extraperitoneal ss-RARP.
基金supported by grants from the National Nat-ural Science Foundation of China(82173129)the Innova-tive and Entrepreneurial Talent Doctor of Jiangsu Province,China(JSSCBS20221872)。
文摘Background:Dorsal approach is the potentially effective strategy for minimally invasive liver resection.This study aimed to compare the outcomes between robot-assisted and laparoscopic hemihepatectomy through dorsal approach.Methods:We compared the patients who underwent robot-assisted hemihepatectomy(Rob-HH)and who had laparoscopic hemihepatectomy(Lap-HH)through dorsal approach between January 2020 and December 2022.A 1:1 propensity score-matching(PSM)analysis was performed to minimize bias and confounding factors.Results:Ninety-six patients were included,41 with Rob-HH and 55 with Lap-HH.Among them,58 underwent left hemihepatectomy(LHH)and 38 underwent right hemihepatectomy(RHH).Compared with LapHH group,patients with Rob-HH had less estimated blood loss(median:100.0 vs.300.0 m L,P=0.016),lower blood transfusion rates(4.9%vs.29.1%,P=0.003)and postoperative complication rates(26.8%vs.54.5%,P=0.016).These significant differences consistently existed after PSM and in the LHH subgroups.Furthermore,robot-assisted LHH was associated with decreased Pringle duration(45 vs.60 min,P=0.047).RHH subgroup analysis showed that compared with Lap-RHH,Rob-RHH was associated with less estimated blood loss(200.0 vs.400.0 m L,P=0.013).No significant differences were found in other perioperative outcomes among pre-and post-PSM cohorts,such as Pringle duration,operative time,and hospital stay.Conclusions:The dorsal approach was a safe and feasible strategy for hemi-hepatectomy with favorable outcomes under robot-assisted system in reducing intraoperative blood loss,transfusion,and postoperative complications.
基金supported by the Key Medical Scientific Research Project of the Jiangsu Commission of Health(No.ZD2021028 to Zhu Q)the General Project of the Medical Scientific Research of the Jiangsu Commission of Health(No.Z2021074 to Shen L).
文摘Objective:To evaluate the feasibility and safety of laparoendoscopic single-site robot-assisted nephroureterectomy(LESS-RANU)by comparing perioperative,pathological,and oncological results with the conventional multiport laparoendoscopic approach in the retroperitoneal approach for the management of urinary tract urothelial carcinoma.Methods:Between January 2021 and October 2024,our center treated 56 patients with urinary tract urothelial carcinoma using either the LESS-RANU(n�31)or the conventional multi-port laparoscopic nephroureterectomy(LNU)(n�25)via the retroperitoneal approach.Data including demographic,perioperative,pathological,and oncological characteristics were collected.Results:No significant differences were found in patient demographics and tumor characteristics between the two groups.No serious intraoperative complications occurred in both groups.The mean operation time,skin incision length,Visual Analog Scale pain scores,time for repositioning and follow-up duration for the LESS-RANU group and the LNU group were 138.23 min and 180.40 min,6.48 cm and 15.40 cm,3.23 and 4.60,5.71 min and 30.24 min,and 10.84 months and 22.88 months,respectively(p<0.001).There were no significant differences in other perioperative data between the two groups.Multiple linear regression identified an association of body mass index with operation time in the LESS-RANU group(p<0.001).The mean operative time of the subsequent 15 patients was significantly lower than that of the initial 16 patients(130.33 min vs.145.31 min,p=0.044).There were no significant differences in the pathological characteristics between the two groups.Recurrences developed in four patients:one in the LESS-RANU group and three in the LNU group.-Conclusion:LESS-RANU is safe and more effective compared to LNU via the retroperitoneal approach,especially for patients with low body mass index.
文摘Objective:We investigated patients who underwent robot-assisted radical prostatectomy(RARP)with pelvic lymph node dissection(PLND),analyzing the prevalence and risk factors associated with symptomatic lymphoceles(SLCs).Methods:We evaluated 354 consecutive patients who underwent RARP with PLND by our team between June 2016 and December 2022.After analyzing the prevalence of SLCs,patients were divided into two groups,with and without SLCs.The variables were age,body mass index(BMI),prostate-specific antigen,surgery time,blood loss,length of stay,International Society of Urological Pathology score in the pathology,and the number of lymph nodes removed.These variables were compared between these groups using the Chi-square test and Student's t-test,according to the type of the variable.In all analyses,a significance level of<0.05 was considered.Results:The prevalence of SLCs in this sample of patients undergoing RARP with PLND was 2.0%(7/354),which is slightly lower than the minimum rate reported in the literature.In our analysis,BMI(p=0.041),the number of lymph nodes removed(p=0.007),and length of hospital stay(p=0.007)were factors associated with the presence of SLCs.Conclusion:The prevalence of SLCs in patients undergoing RARP with PLND is approximately 2.0%.Higher BMI,greater number of lymph nodes removed,and longer length of hospital stay are factors associated with the presence of SLCs.
基金funded by National Natural Science Foundation of China(82072846 to Xu B).
文摘Objective:Robot-assisted simple prostatectomy(RASP)is increasingly used as a surgical treatment option for large benign prostatic hyperplasia(BPH)(>80 mL).However,there is no sufficient expert consensus or guidelines to guide clinical practice.We aimed to obtain expert opinions for RASP for large BPH.Methods:A systematic review of the literature was performed in April 2024 using the PubMed,Embase,and Web of Science databases.Search terms were combined to construct the following search strings:(robotic)AND(simple OR benign)AND(prostatectomy).Search results were filtered by language(English only),species(human),and publication type(original article).This study used a two-phase modified Delphi approach.Results:In this expert consensus,some frequently used RASP techniques,including robot-assisted retropubic prostatectomy,robot-assisted transvesical prostatectomy,and robot-assisted urethra-sparing prostatectomy,are described.RASP offers a short learning curve for surgeons with experience in robotic surgery.Severe complications are rare in patients who undergo RASP.Conclusion:RASP technique can be recommended as a safe and effective minimally invasive treatment for symptomatic BPH patients with large prostate glands.
文摘Objective:Since the introduction of the Da Vinci®robotic system,robot-assisted colon resection has gained popularity because of its the potential technical advantages.Recently,two new CE-marked platforms have become available in Europe:Hugo^(TM)RAS and Versius®.We present the firstprospective case series comparing these three robotic systems.Methods:This exploratory,prospective study enrolled 45 consecutive adult patients undergoing robotic colon resection between February and December 2024,as part of the COMPAR trial.Two experienced colorectal surgeons performed all procedures across two surgical units.Each robotic platform was used in 15 cases.The primary outcomes were conversion to laparoscopy or open surgery and intra-operative complications.The secondary outcomes included post-operative recovery,oncological results,and platform-specifictechnical parameters.Results:The mean age was 66.8 years and 68.9%of patients underwent surgery for colon cancer.No conversions occurred in the Da Vinci group,whereas 2 and 3 conversions to laparoscopy were recorded with Hugo^(TM)RAS and Versius®,respectively.One intra-operative instrument malfunction occurred with Hugo^(TM)RAS,and one surgical complication was reported in each group.No significantdifferences emerged in post-operative recovery or oncological outcomes.Versius®cases required more frequent use of laparoscopic energy devices(p<0.001).Hugo^(TM)RAS was associated with a longer total operating room time(p=0.022)and longer incision length(p=0.005).Conclusion:Robotic colorectal surgery with all three platforms is feasible when performed by expert surgeons.While early outcomes are encouraging,larger comparative trials are needed to confirmdifferences in recovery and oncological efficacy.
基金ZJU 100 Young Talent ProgramKey Program for Robot-assisted Subretinal Injection Research Center in Zhejiang Province,Grant/Award Number:2023ZY1061。
文摘Subretinal injection is a complicated task for retinal surgeons to operate manually.In this paper we demonstrate a robust framework for needle detection and localisation in robotassisted subretinal injection using microscope-integrated Optical Coherence Tomography with deep learning.Five convolutional neural networks with different architectures were evaluated.The main differences between the architectures are the amount of information they receive at the input layer.When evaluated on ex-vivo pig eyes,the top performing network successfully detected all needles in the dataset and localised them with an Intersection over Union value of 0.55.The algorithm was evaluated by comparing the depth of the top and bottom edge of the predicted bounding box to the ground truth.This analysis showed that the top edge can be used to predict the depth of the needle with a maximum error of 8.5μm.
文摘Objective:Thulium fiber laser enucleation of the prostate(ThuFLEP)and robot-assisted simple prostatectomy(RASP)are two options for treating large benign prostatic hyperplasia.The most appropriate technique remains a matter of debate.We evaluated the efficacy and safety of ThuFLEP compared to RASP.Methods:Between January 2020 and December 2023,all patients who underwent either RASP or ThuFLEP for a prostate volume>80 mL were retrospectively included.The surgical procedure choice was left to the surgeon’s and patient’s discretion.Preoperative patient evaluation included the assessment of functional parameters.The groups were compared.Results:A total of 234 patients were included:106(45%)underwent RASP and 128(55%)underwent ThuFLEP.The mean operative time was shorter in the ThuFLEP group compared to the RASP group(106.4 with standard deviation[SD]46.1 min vs.123.2[SD 32.8]min,p=0.012).The mean lengths of catheterization and stay were significantly longer in the RASP group(5.0[SD 3.9]days vs.1.7[SD 2.0]days,p=0.009[catheterization]and 4.9[SD 3.0]days vs.1.9[SD 1.8]days,p=0.009[stay]).The overall complication rate was significantly higher in the ThuFLEP group(12%vs.2.8%in the RASP group,p=0.022).However,we did not observe significant differences in major complications(Clavien-Dindo≥3)between the two groups(four[3.1%]in the ThuFLEP group vs.one[0.94%]in the RASP group,p=0.073).At 3 months,the rate of stress urinary incontinence was 4.7%after ThuFLEP and 1.9%after RASP(p=0.2).Finally,the quality of life score and maximum urinary flow were comparable between the ThuFLEP and RASP groups,but the International Prostate Symptom Score at 3 months postoperatively was lower in the RASP group(p=0.012).Conclusion:Both ThuFLEP and RASP are safe techniques with comparable functional outcomes for large benign prostatic hyperplasia.ThuFLEP allows a reduction in catheterization and hospitalization durations but presents more complications compared to RASP.
基金Nanjing Medical University Science and Technology Development Fund(NMUB20240122)。
文摘Objective:To investigate the effects of robot-assisted training on upper limb function in elderly stroke patients.Methods:Seventy elderly stroke patients treated in the Rehabilitation Medicine Department of Jiangsu Provincial Organ Hospital from January 2023 to December 2023 were randomly divided into an intervention group(n=35)and a control group(n=35).In addition to conventional rehabilitation and nursing care,both groups received 40 minutes of daily upper limb training.The control group underwent entirely manual training,whereas the intervention group received a combination of 20 minutes of manual and 20 minutes of robot-assisted training.All participants completed this protocol five times weekly for four weeks,with assessments of upper limb motor function and activities of daily living(ADL)conducted pre-and post-intervention.Results:After treatment,both groups showed significant increases in Fugl-Meyer Assessment(FMA-UE)and Barthel Index(BI)scores compared to before treatment(p<0.01).The intervention group had higher FMA-UE scores than the control group(p<0.05),while there was no significant difference in BI scores between the two groups after treatment(p>0.05).Conclusion:Robot-assisted training can improve upper limb motor function and enhance ADL capabilities in elderly stroke patients.
基金supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities(2023SCU12057)the National Natural Science Foundation of China(82373106,82372831,and 32270690).
文摘Robot-assisted surgery has evolved into a crucial treatment for prostate cancer(PCa).However,from its appearance to today,brain-computer interface,virtual reality,and metaverse have revolutionized the field of robot-assisted surgery for PCa,presenting both opportunities and challenges.Especially in the context of contemporary big data and precision medicine,facing the heterogeneity of PCa and the complexity of clinical problems,it still needs to be continuously upgraded and improved.Keeping this in mind,this article summarized the 5 stages of the historical development of robot-assisted surgery for PCa,encompassing the stages of emergence,promotion,development,maturity,and intelligence.Initially,safety concerns were paramount,but subsequent research and engineering advancements have focused on enhancing device efficacy,surgical technology,and achieving precise multi modal treatment.The dominance of da Vinci robot-assisted surgical system has seen this evolution intimately tied to its successive versions.In the future,robot-assisted surgery for PCa will move towards intelligence,promising improved patient outcomes and personalized therapy,alongside formidable challenges.To guide future development,we propose 10 significant prospects spanning clinical,research,engineering,materials,social,and economic domains,envisioning a future era of artificial intelligence in the surgical treatment of PCa.
文摘Background:Artificial intelligence(AI)-assisted threedimensional(3D)surgical platforms,integrated with augmented reality,have the potential to improve intraoperative anatomical recognition and provide surgeons with an immersive,dynamic operating environment during urooncological procedures.This review aims to examine the current applications of AI in robotic uro-oncology,with a particular focus on its role in facilitating intraoperative navigation during complex surgeries.Methods:A systematic literature search was performed across PubMed,the National Library of Medicine,MEDLINE,the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials(CENTRAL),ClinicalTrials.gov,and Google Scholar to identify relevant studies published up to July 2025.The search strategy incorporated a predefined set of keywords,including AI,machine learning,radical prostatectomy(RP),robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy(RARP),robotassisted partial nephrectomy(RAPN),and robot-assisted radical cystectomy(RARC).Only clinical trials,full-text peer-reviewed publications,and original research articles were included.Studies were eligible for inclusion if they evaluated or described applications of AI in RARP,RAPN,or RARC.Results:Technological advancements have substantially transformed the field of uro-oncologic surgery.In particular,AI and AI-assisted intraoperative navigation in RARP demonstrate considerable potential to objectively assess surgical performance and predict clinical outcomes.In RAPN,the adoption of preoperative,interactive 3D virtualmodels for surgical planning has influenced surgical decisions,thus,enhanced precision in resection planning correlates with superior nephron-sparing outcomes and optimized selective clamping.AI applications in RARC,techniques such as augmented reality(AR)can overlay critical information on the surgical field,by facilitating navigation through complex anatomical planes and enhancing identification of critical structures.Conclusion:AI appears to enhance robotic uro-oncologic procedures by increasing operative precision and supporting individualised surgical treatment strategies.
文摘Background:The Da Vinci Single-Port Robotic System(Da Vinci-SP),introduced by Intuitive(CA,USA)in 2018 in the USA and in 2024 in Europe,integrates advanced features like a flexible camera and articulating instruments.It has garnered significant interest in urology.Our report presents the first described European series of Radical Prostatectomies using the Da Vinci SP at the leading Italian center,Istituto Nazionale Tumori di Napoli,IRCCS“G.Pascale”Foundation,detailing the technical differences and challenges faced by experienced multiport robotic surgeons.Methods:Sixteen patients have been enrolled and underwent Single-Port(SP)Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy(SP-RARP).Baseline characteristics of the patients were collected.We provided a step-by-step description of the surgical technique.Oncological outcomes have been evaluated and compared with magnetic resonance imaging(MRI)and biopsy results.Intraoperative,perioperative,and postoperative complications,surgical outcomes,functional outcomes,and technical issues of the new system were also documented.Results:All surgeries were successfully performed without the need for conversion.An extraperitoneal approach was used for all patients.Median Console time was 110 min.No complications were reported.The estimated median blood loss was 175 cc.Discharge from the hospital was on the first post-operative day for all patients.Bladder catheter removal was on day 7 without the need for cystography.Conclusions:We presented the first European case series of SP-RARP,reporting our experience and confirming the procedure’s feasibility for a highly experienced robotic surgeon.Experience with an extraperitoneal approach using the multiport(MP)platform,combined with well-conducted training for the SP system,may facilitate the transition to SP surgery.Further procedures and studies are needed to evaluate the oncological and functional outcomes.
文摘Radical gastrectomy with an adequate lymphadenectomy is the main procedure which makes it possible to cure patients with resectable gastric cancer (GC). A number of randomized controlled trials and meta-analysis provide phase III evidence that laparoscopic gastrectomy is technically safe and that it yields better short-term outcomes than conventional open gastrectomy for early-stage GC. While laparoscopic gastrectomy has become standard therapy for early-stage GC, especially in Asian countries such as Japan and South Korea, the use of minimally invasive techniques is still controversial for the treatment of more advanced tumours, principally due to existing concerns about its oncological adequacy and capacity to carry out an adequately extended lymphadenectomy. Some intrinsic drawbacks of the conventional laparoscopic technique have prevented the worldwide spread of laparoscopic gastrectomy for cancer and, despite technological advances in recent year, it remains a technically challenging procedure. The introduction of robotic surgery over the last ten years has implied a notable mutation of certain minimally invasive procedures, making it possible to overcome some limitations of the traditional laparoscopic technique. Robot-assisted gastric resection with D2 lymph node dissection has been shown to be safe and feasible in prospective and retrospective studies. However, to date there are no high quality comparative studies investigating the advantages of a robotic approach to GC over traditional laparoscopic and open gastrectomy. On the basis of the literature review here presented, robot-assisted surgery seems to fulfill oncologic criteria for D2 dissection and has a comparable oncologic outcome to traditional laparoscopic and open procedure. Robot-assisted gastrectomy was associated with the trend toward a shorter hospital stay with a comparable morbidity of conventional laparoscopic and open gastrectomy, but randomized clinical trials and longer follow-ups are needed to evaluate the possible influence of robot gastrectomy on GC patient survival.
文摘AIM To evaluate the potential effectiveness of robot-assisted gastrectomy(RAG) in comparison to open gastrectomy(OG) for gastric cancer patients.METHODS A comprehensive systematic literature search using PubM ed,EMBASE,and the Cochrane Library was carried out to identify studies comparing RAG and OG in gastric cancer.Participants of any age and sex were considered for inclusion in comparative studies of the two techniques independently from type of gastrectomy.A meta-analysis of short-term perioperative outcomes was performed to evaluate whether RAG is equivalent to OG.The primary outcome measures were set for estimated blood loss,operative time,conversion rate,morbidity,and hospital stay.Secondary among postoperative complications,wound infection,bleeding and anastomotic leakage were also analysed.RESULTS A total of 6 articles,5 retrospective and 1 randomized controlled study,involving 6123 patients overall,with 689(11.3%) cases submitted to RAG and 5434(88.7%) to OG,satisfied the eligibility criteria and were included in the meta-analysis.RAG was associated with longer operation time than OG(weighted mean difference 72.20 min;P < 0.001),but with reduction in blood loss and shorter hospital stay(weighted mean difference-166.83 mL and-1.97 d respectively;P < 0.001).No differences were found with respect to overall postoperative complications(P = 0.65),wound infection(P = 0.35),bleeding(P = 0.65),and anastomotic leakage(P = 0.06).The postoperative mortality rates were similar between the two groups.With respect to oncological outcomes,no statistical differences among the number of harvested lymph nodes were found(weighted mean difference-1.12;P = 0.10).CONCLUSION RAG seems to be a technically valid alternative to OG for performing radical gastrectomy in gastric cancer resulting in safe complications.
文摘Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy （RARP） is a rapidly evolving technique for the treatment of localized prostate cancer. In the United States, over 65% of radical prostatectomies are robot-assisted, although the acceptance of this technology in Europe and the rest of the world has been somewhat slower. This article reviews the current literature on RARP with regard to oncological, continence and potency outcomes-the so-called ＇trifecta＇. Preliminary data appear to show an advantage of RARP over open prostatectomy, with reduced blood loss, decreased pain, early mobilization, shorter hospital stay and lower margin rates. Most studies show good postoperative continence and potency with RARP; however, this needs to be viewed in the context of the paucity of randomized data available in the literature. There is no definitive evidence to show an advantage over standard laparoscopy, but the fact that this technique has reached parity with laparoscopy within 5 years is encouraging. Finally, evolving techniques of single-port robotic prostatectomy, laser- guided robotics, catheter-free prostatectomy and image-guided robotics are discussed.
基金supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 51165040,50775119)Visiting Scholar Foundation of Key Lab in University of China (Grant No. GZKF-201020)
文摘Needle insertion is a common surgical procedure used in diagnosis and treatment.The needle steering technologies make continuous developments in theoretical and practical aspects along with the in-depth research on needle insertion.It is necessary to summarize and analyze the existing results to promote the future development of theories and applications of needle insertion.Thus,a survey of the state of the art of research is presented on algorithms of needle steering techniques,the surgical robots and devices.Based on the analysis of the needle insertion procedure,the concept of needle steering is defined as a kinematics problem,which is to place the needle at the target and avoid the obstacles.The needle steering techniques,including the artificial potential field method and the nonholonomic model,are introduced to control the needles for improving the accuracy.Based on the quasi-static thinking,the virtual spring model and the cantilever-beam model are developed to calculate the amount of needle deflection and generate the needle path.The phantoms instead of the real tissue are used to verify the models mentioned in most of the experimentations.For the desired needle trajectories,the image-guided robotic devices and some novel needles are presented to achieve the needle steering.Finally,the challenges are provided involving the controllability of the long flexible needle and the properties of soft tissue.The results and investigations can be used for further study on the precision and accuracy of needle insertion.
文摘Aim： To determine if robot-assisted varicocelectomy can be safely and effectively performed when compared to microscopic inguinal varicocelectomy. Methods： Eight patients aged 29.1 ± 12.5 years underwent microscopic subinguinal varicocelectomies： seven patients with left-sided repair, and one patient with bilateral repair. Eight patients aged 22.0 ±8.0 years underwent robot-assisted varicocelectomies： seven patients with left-sided repair and one patient with bilateral repair. Results： The average operative time for microscopic inguinal varicocelectomy was 73.9 ±12.2 min, whereas the robot-assisted technique took 71.1± 21.1 min. There were no difficulties in identifying and isolating vessels and the vas deferens with robot-assisted subinguinal varicocelectomy. Hand tremor was eliminated using the robotic procedure. Patients who underwent either microscopic or robot-assisted varicocelectomies were able to resume daily activities on the day of surgery and full activities within 2 weeks. There were no complications or recurrences of varicocele. Conclusion： From our experience, compared to microscopic surgery, robot-assisted varicocelectomy can be safely and effectively performed, with the added benefit of eliminating hand tremor.
文摘Vasectomy reversal （VR） has traditionally been performed with the operative microscope. Recently, robot assistance has been applied to VR. Retrospective chart review from a single VR center included men who underwent either robot-assisted VR （RAVR） or microsurgical VR （MVR） by a single fellowship trained microsurgeon between 2011 and 2013 and had a 6 weeks postoperative semen analysis. Fifty-two men who were interested in VR were counseled and given the option of RAVR versus MVR. Twenty-seven men elected to have MVR while 25 men elected RAVR. These included vasovasostomies and vasoepididymostomies in both groups, as well as redo VRs in men who had failed previous VR attempts by other surgeons. There was no statistically significant difference between the microsurgical group and the robot-assisted group, respectively, in overall patency rates （89% vs 92%）, 6 weeks post-VR mean sperm concentrations （28 million m1-1 vs 26 million m1-1） or total motile counts （29 million vs 30 million）, or mean operative times （141 min vs 150 min）. There was a statistically significant difference in anastomosis time （64 min vs 74 min）, however, clinically this only represented a 10 min longer anastomosis time in the early robotic experience, which was found to be decreasing as the case series continued. Transitioning from MVR to RAVR is feasible with comparable outcomes.
