The study focuses on the research performance of Double First-Class(DFC)universities in China.A theoretical framework based on economic theory and the Analytic Hierarchy Process(AHP)method for a novel evaluation model...The study focuses on the research performance of Double First-Class(DFC)universities in China.A theoretical framework based on economic theory and the Analytic Hierarchy Process(AHP)method for a novel evaluation model is proposed.The model is performed on a sample of 41 participant DFC universities in China.Using data collected from these universities,it was found that there is no consistency between performance ranking,input ranking,and output ranking,with the best ranked universities far from the most efficient.These findings provide empirical evidence of DFC universities’research performance situation and suggest strategies that the government can use to propel their sustainable development.展开更多
Citations and the h-index are parameters to evaluate a researcher’s performance.Several platforms are used to analyse these parameters.However,all of them differ in their methods.As a consequence,an author can appear...Citations and the h-index are parameters to evaluate a researcher’s performance.Several platforms are used to analyse these parameters.However,all of them differ in their methods.As a consequence,an author can appear with several different h-index values and with a varying number of publications and citations,which can differ by more than a hundred per cent from one platform to another.This work investigates the differences in values obtained using the publication data of the author of this paper.展开更多
文摘The study focuses on the research performance of Double First-Class(DFC)universities in China.A theoretical framework based on economic theory and the Analytic Hierarchy Process(AHP)method for a novel evaluation model is proposed.The model is performed on a sample of 41 participant DFC universities in China.Using data collected from these universities,it was found that there is no consistency between performance ranking,input ranking,and output ranking,with the best ranked universities far from the most efficient.These findings provide empirical evidence of DFC universities’research performance situation and suggest strategies that the government can use to propel their sustainable development.
文摘Citations and the h-index are parameters to evaluate a researcher’s performance.Several platforms are used to analyse these parameters.However,all of them differ in their methods.As a consequence,an author can appear with several different h-index values and with a varying number of publications and citations,which can differ by more than a hundred per cent from one platform to another.This work investigates the differences in values obtained using the publication data of the author of this paper.
