To the Editor:Transparency is acknowledged to be crucial for the improvement of interdisciplinary research quality and reproducibility.The International Committee of Medical Journal Editors(ICMJE)has introduced requir...To the Editor:Transparency is acknowledged to be crucial for the improvement of interdisciplinary research quality and reproducibility.The International Committee of Medical Journal Editors(ICMJE)has introduced requirements for prospective registration,reporting of results and data sharing to make trial registration in public databases a standard practice.[1,2]Transparency of systematic reviews can also be evaluated from prospective registration of schemes and/or publicly available protocols.However,no framework exists for the evaluation of the transparency of clinical practice guidelines(CPGs)and definitions of guideline transparency remain unclear.展开更多
基金This study was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China(Nos.72074161 and 81873197)the Project of Medical Management Center of National Health Commission,China(No.ZX2022020).
文摘To the Editor:Transparency is acknowledged to be crucial for the improvement of interdisciplinary research quality and reproducibility.The International Committee of Medical Journal Editors(ICMJE)has introduced requirements for prospective registration,reporting of results and data sharing to make trial registration in public databases a standard practice.[1,2]Transparency of systematic reviews can also be evaluated from prospective registration of schemes and/or publicly available protocols.However,no framework exists for the evaluation of the transparency of clinical practice guidelines(CPGs)and definitions of guideline transparency remain unclear.
