Background:The STAR(Scientific,Transparent,and Applicable Rankings)working group conducts regular evaluations of Chinese guidelines and consensus statements.This study gathered insights from STAR working group members...Background:The STAR(Scientific,Transparent,and Applicable Rankings)working group conducts regular evaluations of Chinese guidelines and consensus statements.This study gathered insights from STAR working group members using qualitative interviews.Methods:From March to August 2023,members of the STAR specialist committees were interviewed using semi-structured interview outline.The interviewees were selected through purpose-based sampling.Subject analysis was employed to summarize the findings.Results:We conducted interviews with 37 members from 36 committees and summarized the contents into four main themes and 16 specific topics.The value of STAR in enhancing the development and selection of high-quality guidelines in China was commonly mentioned.Challenges identified included the lack of resources and suboptimal organizational structures,collaboration,and evaluation efficiency.Suggestions for the STAR tool included developing extensions for different guideline types,adjusting certain items,and better covering guideline applicability.The promotion of STAR and the consideration of an international committee for global outreach were also highlighted.Conclusion:STAR has exerted a substantial influence on the evaluation of Chinese guidelines,and the insights gained from interviews offer valuable directions for its further enhancement.展开更多
基金The study was funded by the special Funding for Basic Research Expenses for Government Department-affiliated Universities(No.lzujbky-2021-ey13).
文摘Background:The STAR(Scientific,Transparent,and Applicable Rankings)working group conducts regular evaluations of Chinese guidelines and consensus statements.This study gathered insights from STAR working group members using qualitative interviews.Methods:From March to August 2023,members of the STAR specialist committees were interviewed using semi-structured interview outline.The interviewees were selected through purpose-based sampling.Subject analysis was employed to summarize the findings.Results:We conducted interviews with 37 members from 36 committees and summarized the contents into four main themes and 16 specific topics.The value of STAR in enhancing the development and selection of high-quality guidelines in China was commonly mentioned.Challenges identified included the lack of resources and suboptimal organizational structures,collaboration,and evaluation efficiency.Suggestions for the STAR tool included developing extensions for different guideline types,adjusting certain items,and better covering guideline applicability.The promotion of STAR and the consideration of an international committee for global outreach were also highlighted.Conclusion:STAR has exerted a substantial influence on the evaluation of Chinese guidelines,and the insights gained from interviews offer valuable directions for its further enhancement.
