On September 11, 2007, Qi Xiufen, Director of the International Department of the General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of China (AQSIQ), published the China Annual Report on Tec... On September 11, 2007, Qi Xiufen, Director of the International Department of the General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of China (AQSIQ), published the China Annual Report on Technical Barriers to Trade.Wang Nini, Director of the Standard, Law and Regulation Center of AQSIQ, gave a detailed explanation of the contents of the report.……展开更多
At the regular news press held by China Council for the Promotion of International Trade(CCPIT) held on September 22,China Academy of Arbitration Law officially published China International Commercial Arbitration Ann...At the regular news press held by China Council for the Promotion of International Trade(CCPIT) held on September 22,China Academy of Arbitration Law officially published China International Commercial Arbitration Annual Report (2014).This is the first report released展开更多
China on February 6,2012 released a high-resolution full map of the entire moon,marking the best view yet of the lunar surface captured by China's second moon orbiter,Chang'e 2.While other countries have acqui...China on February 6,2012 released a high-resolution full map of the entire moon,marking the best view yet of the lunar surface captured by China's second moon orbiter,Chang'e 2.While other countries have acquired better images of certain portions展开更多
1AIM AND SCOPE Geoscience Frontiers(GSF)publishes peer reviewed research articles and reviews in interdisciplinary fields of Earth and Planetary Sciences.GSF bridges innovative,provocative and challenging concepts and...1AIM AND SCOPE Geoscience Frontiers(GSF)publishes peer reviewed research articles and reviews in interdisciplinary fields of Earth and Planetary Sciences.GSF bridges innovative,provocative and challenging concepts and models related to various fields of research including petrology and geochemistry in understanding lithospheric architecture and mantle dynamics,global tectonics,economic geology and fuel exploration,geophysics,stratigraphy and paleontology with insights on correlations and evolution,environmental and engineering geology,astrogeology,nexus of resources-energy-emissions-climate under Sustainable Development Goals,among other themes.展开更多
1AIMANDSCOPE Geoscience Frontiers(GSF)publishes peer reviewed research articles and reviews in interdisciplinary fields of Earth and Planetary Sciences.GSF bridges innovative,provocative and challenging concepts and m...1AIMANDSCOPE Geoscience Frontiers(GSF)publishes peer reviewed research articles and reviews in interdisciplinary fields of Earth and Planetary Sciences.GSF bridges innovative,provocative and challenging concepts and models related to various fields of research including petrology and geochemistry in understanding lithospheric architecture and mantle dynamics,global tectonics,economic geology and fuel exploration,geophysics,stratigraphy and paleontology with insights on correlations and evolution,environmental and engineering geology,astrogeology,nexus of resources-energy-emissions-climate under Sustainable Development Goals,among other themes.展开更多
Gastroesophageal reflux disease(GERD)affects both adults and children,although the symptoms differ significantly between these groups.While adults typically experience heartburn and regurgitation,children may present ...Gastroesophageal reflux disease(GERD)affects both adults and children,although the symptoms differ significantly between these groups.While adults typically experience heartburn and regurgitation,children may present with more subtle signs,such as failure to thrive,chronic cough,wheezing,and Sandifer syn-drome.Diagnosing GERD in children necessitates a multifaceted approach due to the diverse symptomatology and challenges in communication.Clinical assess-ment serves as the cornerstone of diagnosis,supported by tools like pH moni-toring,esophageal impedance testing,and upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.Imaging studies,such as barium swallow,can also provide valuable insights into anatomical abnormalities and the extent of reflux.Treatment strategies for pe-diatric GERD include lifestyle adjustments,pharmacotherapy,and,in severe cases,surgical interventions.Lifestyle adjustments may involve changes in fee-ding patterns,positional therapy,and weight management.Pharmacological options range from acid suppression with proton pump inhibitors or histamine-2 receptor antagonists to surgical procedures like fundoplication for refractory cases.Personalized management is essential,considering the child’s age,sym-ptom severity,and the presence of complications.This article aims to offer a comprehensive understanding of pediatric GERD by utilizing current research to enhance clinical approaches and improve patient outcomes.展开更多
网络首发(Online First Publish),就是被录用论文在纸质刊物出版前,先以网络出版形式刊发出来,读者可以在文章所在网页阅览、下载和打印。网络首发与纸质版具有同等效力,可减少出版时滞,使作者的首发权得到及时确认,以促进科研成果快速...网络首发(Online First Publish),就是被录用论文在纸质刊物出版前,先以网络出版形式刊发出来,读者可以在文章所在网页阅览、下载和打印。网络首发与纸质版具有同等效力,可减少出版时滞,使作者的首发权得到及时确认,以促进科研成果快速传播。展开更多
网络首发(Online First Publish),就是被录用论文在纸质刊物出版前,先以网络出版形式刊发出来,读者可以在文章所在网页阅览、下载和打印。网络首发与纸质版具有同等效力,可减少出版时滞,使作者的首发权得到及时确认,以促进科研成果快速...网络首发(Online First Publish),就是被录用论文在纸质刊物出版前,先以网络出版形式刊发出来,读者可以在文章所在网页阅览、下载和打印。网络首发与纸质版具有同等效力,可减少出版时滞,使作者的首发权得到及时确认,以促进科研成果快速传播。展开更多
Graphical abstracts(GAs)are emerging as a pivotal tool in medical literature,enhancing the dissemination and comprehension of complex clinical data through visual summaries.This editorial highlights the significant ad...Graphical abstracts(GAs)are emerging as a pivotal tool in medical literature,enhancing the dissemination and comprehension of complex clinical data through visual summaries.This editorial highlights the significant advantages of GAs,including improved clarity,increased reader engagement,and enhanced visibility of research findings.By transforming intricate scientific data into accessible visual formats,these abstracts facilitate quick and effective knowledge transfer,crucial in clinical decision-making and patient care.However,challenges such as potential data misrepresentation due to oversimplification,the skill gap in graphic design among researchers,and the lack of standardized creation guidelines pose barriers to their widespread adoption.Additionally,while software such as Adobe Illustrator,BioRender,and Canva are commonly employed to create these visuals,not all researchers may be proficient in their use.To address these issues,we recommend that academic journals establish clear guidelines and provide necessary design training to researchers.This proactive approach will ensure the creation of high-quality GAs,promote their standardization,and expand their use in clinical reporting,ultimately benefiting the medical community and improving healthcare outcomes.展开更多
The 40th anniversary of Acta Mechanica Sinica(AMS)marks a milestone of the journal and its incessant pursuit of novelty and excellence.AMS strives for publishing reports pushing the knowledge boundaries and breaking e...The 40th anniversary of Acta Mechanica Sinica(AMS)marks a milestone of the journal and its incessant pursuit of novelty and excellence.AMS strives for publishing reports pushing the knowledge boundaries and breaking engineering limits where mechanics plays a vital role.展开更多
The Editorial Board and Publisher would like to take this opportunity to immensely thank the below reviewers who have helped towards the growth of the journal.We greatly appreciate the time you have spent amidst your ...The Editorial Board and Publisher would like to take this opportunity to immensely thank the below reviewers who have helped towards the growth of the journal.We greatly appreciate the time you have spent amidst your busy schedule towards the reviewing of the assigned man-uscripts for“Resources Chemicals and Materials”Journal in 2024!展开更多
Purpose:This study examines the impact of research policy changes on scientific retractions of publications authored by Romanian authors,focusing on national trends and the interplay between policy reforms and publish...Purpose:This study examines the impact of research policy changes on scientific retractions of publications authored by Romanian authors,focusing on national trends and the interplay between policy reforms and publishing practices.Design/methodology/approach:Using data from the Retraction Watch Database and Web of Science(WoS),188 unique retractions involving Romanian authors(2000-2022)were analyzed.The study compared retraction patterns before and after the 2016 reforms,which prioritized the publication of articles in WoS-indexed journals over non-WoS outputs.Findings:The analysis identified two key trends:(1)before the 2016 reforms,retractions predominantly involved non-WoS journals(99 non-WoS retractions to 38 WoS retractions),a trend that reversed post-reform(16 non-WoS to 35 WoS),and(2)while the total number of WoS-indexed retractions increased after the reforms,the retraction rates for WoS articles remained stable.Post-reform reliance on MDPI journals,which have low retraction rates,partially explains this stability.Excluding MDPI publications,retraction rates for articles and reviews increase by 14.91%,aligning with patterns seen elsewhere.Research limitations:The study focuses on retractions involving Romanian authors,limiting its generalizability.Furthermore,reliance on database records may not fully capture all retractions.Practical implications:These findings underscore the need for research policy reforms to consider a broader range of effects,and the need for nuanced interpretations of retraction data,which are influenced by a complex range of factors,including specific publisher practices.Originality/value:This research is the first to investigate the complex relationship between research policy reforms,publisher behavior,and retraction trends.展开更多
Glaucoma,a degenerative optic neuropathy,causes retinal ganglion cell(RGC)apoptosis and irreversible vision loss.Current therapies often fail to stop disease progression despite lowering intraocular pressure,the main ...Glaucoma,a degenerative optic neuropathy,causes retinal ganglion cell(RGC)apoptosis and irreversible vision loss.Current therapies often fail to stop disease progression despite lowering intraocular pressure,the main risk factor.Thus,neuroprotective strategies have gained interest.We performed a bibliometric analysis to determine global publishing trends and relationships among prolific authors,publications,institutions,funding agencies,and journals.We also analyzed author keywords to identify research hotspots in glaucoma neuroprotection.Further,based on keyword analysis,we reviewed most recent literature to understand mechanistic pathways underlying glaucomarelated pathophysiological responses leading to RGC loss.Bibliographic data were sourced from Scopus.Basic bibliographic features were characterized using Scopus’s functions.VOSviewer was used for mapping and visualizing bibliometric networks.The analysis included trends in publications since 2000,the most prolific countries,institutions,authors,and the strength of their linkages.A significant increase in publication output over the past two decades was noted.The United States leads in funding support,research output,and citation links,followed by China and the UK.Among the top 10 most cited authors,three are from Japanese institutions.Keyword analysis shows a focus on molecular targets related to ischemia,excitotoxicity,inflammation,and oxidative stress,with fewer emerging drug candidates and limited clinical trials.Based on the most recent literature,emerging molecular targets underlying these key pathophysiological mechanisms are summarized.In conclusion,while pathophysiology and molecular mechanisms are the current focus,there is not much progress in developing new drug candidates and conducting clinical trials.展开更多
Editor-in Chief:Sung Keun Lee Managing Editor:Heejung Kim Associated Editors:Hema Achyuthan,Laia Alegret,Kristine Asch,Margaret Brocx,Elizabeth Catlos,Chee-Ming Chan,Giuseppe Di Capua,Sabina Dolenec,Andrea Festa,Stanl...Editor-in Chief:Sung Keun Lee Managing Editor:Heejung Kim Associated Editors:Hema Achyuthan,Laia Alegret,Kristine Asch,Margaret Brocx,Elizabeth Catlos,Chee-Ming Chan,Giuseppe Di Capua,Sabina Dolenec,Andrea Festa,Stanley Finney,Kathleen Histon,Gurmeet Kaur,Osamu Kazaoka,Heejung Kim,Jin-Yong Lee,Brian Marker,Victor Mocanu,Nellia Mutemeri,Maria Dolores Pereira,Maria Rose Petrizzo,Mihail Popescu,Brian Pratt,Elizabeth Rovere,Reimar Seltmann,Afroz Ahmad Shahd,Clara Vasconcelos,Wenjiao Xaio In the ever-evolving landscape of academic publishing,the peer review process remains the cornerstone of integrity,rigor,and scholarly excellence.At the heart of this process are our peer reviewers—dedicated experts who generously volunteer their time and expertise to ensure that every episode we publish meets the highest academic standards.展开更多
Purpose:To gain insights into the levels of training and support in research integrity and publishing ethics,levels of experience in publishing in scholarly journals and use of third-party manuscript preparation/editi...Purpose:To gain insights into the levels of training and support in research integrity and publishing ethics,levels of experience in publishing in scholarly journals and use of third-party manuscript preparation/editing services(which can include paper mills),and also to assess levels of awareness regarding different types of publishing ethics misconduct,we surveyed members of the Chinese Academy of Sciences(CAS)Journal Ranking WeChat channel.Design/methodology/approach:The online survey collected voluntary anonymous responses from members of the CAS Journal Ranking WeChat channel,one of largest channels of Chinese researchers at all career stages within STM and social sciences.The respondents of the survey fell into one of the following categories:Undergraduate student,Master’s student,PhD candidate,Researcher,Research manager,Researcher with research management responsibilities,and Librarian.The survey included 14 main questions on the topics of access to research integrity and publishing ethics training,experience levels in publishing in scholarly journals(including using third-party services),authorship experiences and behaviours,levels of concern about different types of research integrity issues,and perceptions on who the respondents think are primarily responsible for upholding research integrity standards and training in publishing ethics.After applying inclusion criteria,1,777 responses were included in the analysis.Findings:Amongst the 1,777 respondents included in the study results,only 55.4%had any access to training in research integrity and publishing ethics,and an even smaller proportion to formal training.Even amongst cohorts with access to training(where respondents in the Researcher cohort have the highest access),answers to the questions on authorship and third-party services reveal many areas of confusion regarding authorship criteria and responsibilities in publishing ethics.In particular,the responses also show limited knowledge in recognising unethical service offerings by third-party services(e.g.adding authors,citations and data/images).The survey responses also show that even though respondents in the undergraduate cohort are already actively publishing articles as well as using third-party manuscript preparation/editing services,they have limited access to training and have high levels of uncertainty about authorship responsibilities.Out of all key stakeholders,respondents perceive research institutions to be mainly responsible for upholding research integrity standards as well as providing access to training.Research limitations:As with all voluntary online surveys,the study design includes inherent limitations due to the self-reported nature of the responses.The respondents who participate are likely to have a particular interest and a higher level of awareness about the survey topic,and so the self-selecting nature of the participants can introduce personal biases,which can affect the overall results.This survey was sent to members of a WeChat channel focused on journal rankings,which also discusses research integrity issues,so the respondents may not provide a general representation of their career stage/subject discipline cohorts.The sample sizes were not comparable across all cohorts,so direct comparisons could not always be made.Instead,where appropriate,separate comparisons were made between Undergraduate students,Master’s students,PhD candidates and Researchers(29.26%-18.68%of respondents),or between Research managers,Researcher with research management responsibilities and Librarians(4.28%-2.53%of respondents).Practical implications:It is important to ensure that research integrity and publishing ethics training and education needs are being met for researchers at all levels,including undergraduates.Findings from the survey highlight the importance of establishing training and education programmes tailored towards addressing specific areas of common confusion or limited awareness,especially to reduce the risk of unintentional misconduct.The findings from this survey can be used to inform training and education partnerships and collaborations across key stakeholders,including research institutions and publishers,so that we can collectively improve the overall integrity of scholarly publishing.A table of recommendations and a hypothetical case have been included to illustrate how this can be achieved.Originality/value:To our knowledge,this is the first survey on this topic developed via a collaboration between the research integrity team at an international scholarly publisher and scientometrics researchers based in China.Sharing our perspectives and experience to develop the survey questions has helped to highlight the common areas of confusion regarding authorship responsibilities and ethical third-party service offerings within researchers in China,even amongst those who do have access to training.展开更多
Purpose:This study investigates whether publication-centric incentive systems,introduced through the National Scientific Accreditation(ASN:Abilitazione Scientifica Nazionale)for professorships in Italy in 2012,contrib...Purpose:This study investigates whether publication-centric incentive systems,introduced through the National Scientific Accreditation(ASN:Abilitazione Scientifica Nazionale)for professorships in Italy in 2012,contribute to adopting“salami publishing”strategies among Italian academics.Design/methodology/approach:A longitudinal bibliometric analysis was conducted on the publication records of over 25,000 Italian science professors to examine changes in publication output and the originality of their work following the implementation of the ASN.Findings:The analysis revealed a significant increase in publication output after the ASN’s introduction,along with a concurrent decline in the originality of publications.However,no evidence was found linking these trends to increased salami slicing practices among the observed researchers.Research limitations:Given the size of our observation field,we propose an innovative indirect approach based on the degree of originality of publications’bibliographies.We know that bibliographic coupling cannot capture salami publications per se,but only topically-related records.On the other hand,controlling for the author’s specialization level in the period,we believe that a higher level of bibliographic coupling in his scientific output can signal a change in his strategy of disseminating the results of his research.The relatively low R-squared values in our models(0.3-0.4)reflect the complexity of the phenomenon under investigation,revealing the presence of unmeasured factors influencing the outcomes,and future research should explore additional variables or alternative models that might account for a greater proportion of the variability.Despite this limitation,the significant predictors identified in our analysis provide valuable insights into the key factors driving the observed outcomes.Practical implications:The results of the study support those who argue that quantitative research assessment frameworks have had very positive effects and should not be dismissed,contrary to the claims of those evoking the occurrence of side effects that do not appear in the empirical analyses.Originality/value:This study provides empirical evidence on the impact of the ASN on publication behaviors in a huge micro-level dataset,contributing to the broader discourse on the effects of quantitative research assessments on academic publishing practices.展开更多
1Legal requirements The author(s)guarantee(s)that the manuscript will not be published elsewhere in any language without the consent of the copyright holders,that the rights of third parties will not be violated,and t...1Legal requirements The author(s)guarantee(s)that the manuscript will not be published elsewhere in any language without the consent of the copyright holders,that the rights of third parties will not be violated,and that the publisher will not be held legally responsible should there be any claims for compensation.展开更多
In Chinese culture,the dragon symbolizes faith,strength,courage,and an air of mystery.In 2024,guided by this auspicious emblem and supported by authors,readers,reviewers,and editorial board members,Zoological Research...In Chinese culture,the dragon symbolizes faith,strength,courage,and an air of mystery.In 2024,guided by this auspicious emblem and supported by authors,readers,reviewers,and editorial board members,Zoological Research(ZR) has successfully completed its annual publishing objectives,achieved significant progress,and secured continued national funding support through its selection for China's Science and Technology Journal Excellence Action Plan (phaseⅡ).As we enter the year of the snake,a symbol of wisdom,renewal,transformation,and growth,we take this opportunity to reflect on past achievements and express our sincere appreciation to all contributors.展开更多
ntroduction Types of paper Contributions falling into the following categories will be considered for publication:Original research papers,Reviews,Short communication.Please ensure that you select the appropriate arti...ntroduction Types of paper Contributions falling into the following categories will be considered for publication:Original research papers,Reviews,Short communication.Please ensure that you select the appropriate article type from the list of options when making your submission.Authors contributing to special issues should ensure that they select the special issue article type from this list.Before You Begin Ethics in Publishing For information on Ethics in Publishing and Ethical guidelines for journal publication see http://www.elsevier.com/publishingethics and http://www.elsevier.com/ethicalguidelines.展开更多
文摘 On September 11, 2007, Qi Xiufen, Director of the International Department of the General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of China (AQSIQ), published the China Annual Report on Technical Barriers to Trade.Wang Nini, Director of the Standard, Law and Regulation Center of AQSIQ, gave a detailed explanation of the contents of the report.……
文摘At the regular news press held by China Council for the Promotion of International Trade(CCPIT) held on September 22,China Academy of Arbitration Law officially published China International Commercial Arbitration Annual Report (2014).This is the first report released
文摘China on February 6,2012 released a high-resolution full map of the entire moon,marking the best view yet of the lunar surface captured by China's second moon orbiter,Chang'e 2.While other countries have acquired better images of certain portions
文摘1AIM AND SCOPE Geoscience Frontiers(GSF)publishes peer reviewed research articles and reviews in interdisciplinary fields of Earth and Planetary Sciences.GSF bridges innovative,provocative and challenging concepts and models related to various fields of research including petrology and geochemistry in understanding lithospheric architecture and mantle dynamics,global tectonics,economic geology and fuel exploration,geophysics,stratigraphy and paleontology with insights on correlations and evolution,environmental and engineering geology,astrogeology,nexus of resources-energy-emissions-climate under Sustainable Development Goals,among other themes.
文摘1AIMANDSCOPE Geoscience Frontiers(GSF)publishes peer reviewed research articles and reviews in interdisciplinary fields of Earth and Planetary Sciences.GSF bridges innovative,provocative and challenging concepts and models related to various fields of research including petrology and geochemistry in understanding lithospheric architecture and mantle dynamics,global tectonics,economic geology and fuel exploration,geophysics,stratigraphy and paleontology with insights on correlations and evolution,environmental and engineering geology,astrogeology,nexus of resources-energy-emissions-climate under Sustainable Development Goals,among other themes.
文摘Gastroesophageal reflux disease(GERD)affects both adults and children,although the symptoms differ significantly between these groups.While adults typically experience heartburn and regurgitation,children may present with more subtle signs,such as failure to thrive,chronic cough,wheezing,and Sandifer syn-drome.Diagnosing GERD in children necessitates a multifaceted approach due to the diverse symptomatology and challenges in communication.Clinical assess-ment serves as the cornerstone of diagnosis,supported by tools like pH moni-toring,esophageal impedance testing,and upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.Imaging studies,such as barium swallow,can also provide valuable insights into anatomical abnormalities and the extent of reflux.Treatment strategies for pe-diatric GERD include lifestyle adjustments,pharmacotherapy,and,in severe cases,surgical interventions.Lifestyle adjustments may involve changes in fee-ding patterns,positional therapy,and weight management.Pharmacological options range from acid suppression with proton pump inhibitors or histamine-2 receptor antagonists to surgical procedures like fundoplication for refractory cases.Personalized management is essential,considering the child’s age,sym-ptom severity,and the presence of complications.This article aims to offer a comprehensive understanding of pediatric GERD by utilizing current research to enhance clinical approaches and improve patient outcomes.
文摘Graphical abstracts(GAs)are emerging as a pivotal tool in medical literature,enhancing the dissemination and comprehension of complex clinical data through visual summaries.This editorial highlights the significant advantages of GAs,including improved clarity,increased reader engagement,and enhanced visibility of research findings.By transforming intricate scientific data into accessible visual formats,these abstracts facilitate quick and effective knowledge transfer,crucial in clinical decision-making and patient care.However,challenges such as potential data misrepresentation due to oversimplification,the skill gap in graphic design among researchers,and the lack of standardized creation guidelines pose barriers to their widespread adoption.Additionally,while software such as Adobe Illustrator,BioRender,and Canva are commonly employed to create these visuals,not all researchers may be proficient in their use.To address these issues,we recommend that academic journals establish clear guidelines and provide necessary design training to researchers.This proactive approach will ensure the creation of high-quality GAs,promote their standardization,and expand their use in clinical reporting,ultimately benefiting the medical community and improving healthcare outcomes.
文摘The 40th anniversary of Acta Mechanica Sinica(AMS)marks a milestone of the journal and its incessant pursuit of novelty and excellence.AMS strives for publishing reports pushing the knowledge boundaries and breaking engineering limits where mechanics plays a vital role.
文摘The Editorial Board and Publisher would like to take this opportunity to immensely thank the below reviewers who have helped towards the growth of the journal.We greatly appreciate the time you have spent amidst your busy schedule towards the reviewing of the assigned man-uscripts for“Resources Chemicals and Materials”Journal in 2024!
文摘Purpose:This study examines the impact of research policy changes on scientific retractions of publications authored by Romanian authors,focusing on national trends and the interplay between policy reforms and publishing practices.Design/methodology/approach:Using data from the Retraction Watch Database and Web of Science(WoS),188 unique retractions involving Romanian authors(2000-2022)were analyzed.The study compared retraction patterns before and after the 2016 reforms,which prioritized the publication of articles in WoS-indexed journals over non-WoS outputs.Findings:The analysis identified two key trends:(1)before the 2016 reforms,retractions predominantly involved non-WoS journals(99 non-WoS retractions to 38 WoS retractions),a trend that reversed post-reform(16 non-WoS to 35 WoS),and(2)while the total number of WoS-indexed retractions increased after the reforms,the retraction rates for WoS articles remained stable.Post-reform reliance on MDPI journals,which have low retraction rates,partially explains this stability.Excluding MDPI publications,retraction rates for articles and reviews increase by 14.91%,aligning with patterns seen elsewhere.Research limitations:The study focuses on retractions involving Romanian authors,limiting its generalizability.Furthermore,reliance on database records may not fully capture all retractions.Practical implications:These findings underscore the need for research policy reforms to consider a broader range of effects,and the need for nuanced interpretations of retraction data,which are influenced by a complex range of factors,including specific publisher practices.Originality/value:This research is the first to investigate the complex relationship between research policy reforms,publisher behavior,and retraction trends.
基金Supported by the Ministry of Higher Education(Malaysia)(No.FRGS/1/2023/SKK15/IMU/01/1)International Medical University[No.PHMS I-2023(01)].
文摘Glaucoma,a degenerative optic neuropathy,causes retinal ganglion cell(RGC)apoptosis and irreversible vision loss.Current therapies often fail to stop disease progression despite lowering intraocular pressure,the main risk factor.Thus,neuroprotective strategies have gained interest.We performed a bibliometric analysis to determine global publishing trends and relationships among prolific authors,publications,institutions,funding agencies,and journals.We also analyzed author keywords to identify research hotspots in glaucoma neuroprotection.Further,based on keyword analysis,we reviewed most recent literature to understand mechanistic pathways underlying glaucomarelated pathophysiological responses leading to RGC loss.Bibliographic data were sourced from Scopus.Basic bibliographic features were characterized using Scopus’s functions.VOSviewer was used for mapping and visualizing bibliometric networks.The analysis included trends in publications since 2000,the most prolific countries,institutions,authors,and the strength of their linkages.A significant increase in publication output over the past two decades was noted.The United States leads in funding support,research output,and citation links,followed by China and the UK.Among the top 10 most cited authors,three are from Japanese institutions.Keyword analysis shows a focus on molecular targets related to ischemia,excitotoxicity,inflammation,and oxidative stress,with fewer emerging drug candidates and limited clinical trials.Based on the most recent literature,emerging molecular targets underlying these key pathophysiological mechanisms are summarized.In conclusion,while pathophysiology and molecular mechanisms are the current focus,there is not much progress in developing new drug candidates and conducting clinical trials.
文摘Editor-in Chief:Sung Keun Lee Managing Editor:Heejung Kim Associated Editors:Hema Achyuthan,Laia Alegret,Kristine Asch,Margaret Brocx,Elizabeth Catlos,Chee-Ming Chan,Giuseppe Di Capua,Sabina Dolenec,Andrea Festa,Stanley Finney,Kathleen Histon,Gurmeet Kaur,Osamu Kazaoka,Heejung Kim,Jin-Yong Lee,Brian Marker,Victor Mocanu,Nellia Mutemeri,Maria Dolores Pereira,Maria Rose Petrizzo,Mihail Popescu,Brian Pratt,Elizabeth Rovere,Reimar Seltmann,Afroz Ahmad Shahd,Clara Vasconcelos,Wenjiao Xaio In the ever-evolving landscape of academic publishing,the peer review process remains the cornerstone of integrity,rigor,and scholarly excellence.At the heart of this process are our peer reviewers—dedicated experts who generously volunteer their time and expertise to ensure that every episode we publish meets the highest academic standards.
基金as a part of the Joint Research Integrity Lab between Taylor and Francis and National Science Library,Chinese Academy of Sciences,a project which is funded by both parties。
文摘Purpose:To gain insights into the levels of training and support in research integrity and publishing ethics,levels of experience in publishing in scholarly journals and use of third-party manuscript preparation/editing services(which can include paper mills),and also to assess levels of awareness regarding different types of publishing ethics misconduct,we surveyed members of the Chinese Academy of Sciences(CAS)Journal Ranking WeChat channel.Design/methodology/approach:The online survey collected voluntary anonymous responses from members of the CAS Journal Ranking WeChat channel,one of largest channels of Chinese researchers at all career stages within STM and social sciences.The respondents of the survey fell into one of the following categories:Undergraduate student,Master’s student,PhD candidate,Researcher,Research manager,Researcher with research management responsibilities,and Librarian.The survey included 14 main questions on the topics of access to research integrity and publishing ethics training,experience levels in publishing in scholarly journals(including using third-party services),authorship experiences and behaviours,levels of concern about different types of research integrity issues,and perceptions on who the respondents think are primarily responsible for upholding research integrity standards and training in publishing ethics.After applying inclusion criteria,1,777 responses were included in the analysis.Findings:Amongst the 1,777 respondents included in the study results,only 55.4%had any access to training in research integrity and publishing ethics,and an even smaller proportion to formal training.Even amongst cohorts with access to training(where respondents in the Researcher cohort have the highest access),answers to the questions on authorship and third-party services reveal many areas of confusion regarding authorship criteria and responsibilities in publishing ethics.In particular,the responses also show limited knowledge in recognising unethical service offerings by third-party services(e.g.adding authors,citations and data/images).The survey responses also show that even though respondents in the undergraduate cohort are already actively publishing articles as well as using third-party manuscript preparation/editing services,they have limited access to training and have high levels of uncertainty about authorship responsibilities.Out of all key stakeholders,respondents perceive research institutions to be mainly responsible for upholding research integrity standards as well as providing access to training.Research limitations:As with all voluntary online surveys,the study design includes inherent limitations due to the self-reported nature of the responses.The respondents who participate are likely to have a particular interest and a higher level of awareness about the survey topic,and so the self-selecting nature of the participants can introduce personal biases,which can affect the overall results.This survey was sent to members of a WeChat channel focused on journal rankings,which also discusses research integrity issues,so the respondents may not provide a general representation of their career stage/subject discipline cohorts.The sample sizes were not comparable across all cohorts,so direct comparisons could not always be made.Instead,where appropriate,separate comparisons were made between Undergraduate students,Master’s students,PhD candidates and Researchers(29.26%-18.68%of respondents),or between Research managers,Researcher with research management responsibilities and Librarians(4.28%-2.53%of respondents).Practical implications:It is important to ensure that research integrity and publishing ethics training and education needs are being met for researchers at all levels,including undergraduates.Findings from the survey highlight the importance of establishing training and education programmes tailored towards addressing specific areas of common confusion or limited awareness,especially to reduce the risk of unintentional misconduct.The findings from this survey can be used to inform training and education partnerships and collaborations across key stakeholders,including research institutions and publishers,so that we can collectively improve the overall integrity of scholarly publishing.A table of recommendations and a hypothetical case have been included to illustrate how this can be achieved.Originality/value:To our knowledge,this is the first survey on this topic developed via a collaboration between the research integrity team at an international scholarly publisher and scientometrics researchers based in China.Sharing our perspectives and experience to develop the survey questions has helped to highlight the common areas of confusion regarding authorship responsibilities and ethical third-party service offerings within researchers in China,even amongst those who do have access to training.
文摘Purpose:This study investigates whether publication-centric incentive systems,introduced through the National Scientific Accreditation(ASN:Abilitazione Scientifica Nazionale)for professorships in Italy in 2012,contribute to adopting“salami publishing”strategies among Italian academics.Design/methodology/approach:A longitudinal bibliometric analysis was conducted on the publication records of over 25,000 Italian science professors to examine changes in publication output and the originality of their work following the implementation of the ASN.Findings:The analysis revealed a significant increase in publication output after the ASN’s introduction,along with a concurrent decline in the originality of publications.However,no evidence was found linking these trends to increased salami slicing practices among the observed researchers.Research limitations:Given the size of our observation field,we propose an innovative indirect approach based on the degree of originality of publications’bibliographies.We know that bibliographic coupling cannot capture salami publications per se,but only topically-related records.On the other hand,controlling for the author’s specialization level in the period,we believe that a higher level of bibliographic coupling in his scientific output can signal a change in his strategy of disseminating the results of his research.The relatively low R-squared values in our models(0.3-0.4)reflect the complexity of the phenomenon under investigation,revealing the presence of unmeasured factors influencing the outcomes,and future research should explore additional variables or alternative models that might account for a greater proportion of the variability.Despite this limitation,the significant predictors identified in our analysis provide valuable insights into the key factors driving the observed outcomes.Practical implications:The results of the study support those who argue that quantitative research assessment frameworks have had very positive effects and should not be dismissed,contrary to the claims of those evoking the occurrence of side effects that do not appear in the empirical analyses.Originality/value:This study provides empirical evidence on the impact of the ASN on publication behaviors in a huge micro-level dataset,contributing to the broader discourse on the effects of quantitative research assessments on academic publishing practices.
文摘1Legal requirements The author(s)guarantee(s)that the manuscript will not be published elsewhere in any language without the consent of the copyright holders,that the rights of third parties will not be violated,and that the publisher will not be held legally responsible should there be any claims for compensation.
文摘In Chinese culture,the dragon symbolizes faith,strength,courage,and an air of mystery.In 2024,guided by this auspicious emblem and supported by authors,readers,reviewers,and editorial board members,Zoological Research(ZR) has successfully completed its annual publishing objectives,achieved significant progress,and secured continued national funding support through its selection for China's Science and Technology Journal Excellence Action Plan (phaseⅡ).As we enter the year of the snake,a symbol of wisdom,renewal,transformation,and growth,we take this opportunity to reflect on past achievements and express our sincere appreciation to all contributors.
文摘ntroduction Types of paper Contributions falling into the following categories will be considered for publication:Original research papers,Reviews,Short communication.Please ensure that you select the appropriate article type from the list of options when making your submission.Authors contributing to special issues should ensure that they select the special issue article type from this list.Before You Begin Ethics in Publishing For information on Ethics in Publishing and Ethical guidelines for journal publication see http://www.elsevier.com/publishingethics and http://www.elsevier.com/ethicalguidelines.
