Dear Editor,General anesthetics play a pivotal role in inducing a safe and reversible loss of consciousness in patients,the importance of which cannot be overstated[1].Among the intravenous anesthetics,propofol stands...Dear Editor,General anesthetics play a pivotal role in inducing a safe and reversible loss of consciousness in patients,the importance of which cannot be overstated[1].Among the intravenous anesthetics,propofol stands out for its rapid onset and swift systemic clearance,effectively eliminating the prolonged sedation associated with earlier agents[2].展开更多
BACKGROUND Propofol has been widely used in bidirectional gastrointestinal endoscopy sedation;however,it frequently leads to cardiovascular adverse events and respiratory depression.Propofol target-controlled infusion...BACKGROUND Propofol has been widely used in bidirectional gastrointestinal endoscopy sedation;however,it frequently leads to cardiovascular adverse events and respiratory depression.Propofol target-controlled infusion(TCI)can provide safe sedation but may require higher dosages of propofol.On the contrary,etomidate offers hemodynamic stability.AIM To evaluate the effect of different dose etomidate added to propofol TCI sedation during same-visit bidirectional endoscopy.METHODS A total of 330 patients from Fujian Provincial Hospital were randomly divided into three groups:P,0.1EP,and 0.15EP.Patients in the P group received propofol TCI only,with an initial effect-site concentration of the propofol TCI system of 3.0 mg/mL.Patients in the 0.1EP and 0.15EP groups received 0.1 and 0.15 mg/kg etomidate intravenous injection,respectively,followed by propofol TCI.RESULTS Patients in the 0.15EP group had higher mean blood pressure after induction than the other groups(P group:78 mmHg,0.1EP group:82 mmHg,0.15EP group:88 mmHg;P<0.05).Total doses of propofol consumption significantly decreased in the 0.15EP group compared with that in the other groups(P group:260.6 mg,0.1EP group:228.1 mg,0.15EP group:201.2 mg;P<0.05).The induction time was longer in the P group than in the other groups(P group:1.9±0.7 minutes,0.1EP group:1.2±0.4 minutes,0.15EP group:1.1±0.3 minutes;P<0.01).The recovery time was shorter in the 0.15EP group than in the other groups(P group:4.8±2.1 minutes,0.1EP group:4.5±1.6 minutes,0.15EP group:3.9±1.4 minutes;P<0.01).The incidence of hypotension(P group:36.4%,0.1EP group:29.1%,0.15EP group:11.8%;P<0.01)and injection pain was lower in the 0.15EP group than in the other groups(P<0.05).Furthermore,the incidence of respiratory depression was lower in the 0.15EP group than in the P group(P<0.05).Additionally,the satisfaction of the patient,endoscopist,and anesthesiologist was higher in the 0.15EP group than in the other groups(P<0.05).CONCLUSION Our findings suggest that 0.15 mg/kg etomidate plus propofol TCI can significantly reduce propofol consumption,which is followed by fewer cardiovascular adverse events and respiratory depression,along with higher patient,endoscopist,and anesthesiologist satisfaction.展开更多
Cancer is one of the most important health problems that deeply affects all humanity and will have groundbreaking consequences in human history with its elimination.Gastrointestinal cancers,including colon and rectum,...Cancer is one of the most important health problems that deeply affects all humanity and will have groundbreaking consequences in human history with its elimination.Gastrointestinal cancers,including colon and rectum,stomach,liver,pancreatic,and esophageal,account for 26%of the global cancer incidence and 35%of cancer-related deaths.Unfortunately,it is estimated that today’s high incidence and mortality rates will increase by 58%and 73%by 2040,respectively.Although the treatment process includes novel options such as immunotherapy in addition to classical options with a multidisciplinary approach,surgical treatment under general anesthesia remains the leading option.Considering a long-lasting cancer process,it is quite surprising that a very short-term anesthetic adminis-tration can have various effects on cancer cell behavior.Various anesthetic approaches such as regional blocks used in pain management,the use of ane-sthetic adjuvants such asβ-adrenoceptor antagonists,nonsteroidal anti-inflam-matory drugs,and intravenous lidocaine,and the choice of anesthetic drugs seem to have potential effects on long-term cancer outcomes.Propofol is an intravenous anesthetic drug that is used for both induction and maintenance of general anesthesia.Many in vitro and clinical studies examining the effects of propofol comparatively with other anesthetic agents on tumor recurrence and metastasis revealed possible effects on tumor cell signaling,the immune response,and the modulation of the neuroendocrine stress response.However,the evidence from all these in vitro and clinical studies is different,complicated,and inconsistent.The general effects of propofol on the behavioral patterns,growth,and metastasis of gastrointestinal tumor cells,as well as the clinical features and consequences resulting from these effects,constitute the subject of this review.展开更多
BACKGROUND Gastric cancer is a major global health issue,and the perioperative period critic-ally influences patient outcomes.The different effects of sevoflurane inhalation anesthesia and propofol total intravenous a...BACKGROUND Gastric cancer is a major global health issue,and the perioperative period critic-ally influences patient outcomes.The different effects of sevoflurane inhalation anesthesia and propofol total intravenous anesthesia on intraoperative stability,postoperative complications,and long-term oncologic outcomes in patients with gastric cancer undergoing radical gastrectomy remain unclear.AIM To compare the effects of sevoflurane inhalation anesthesia and propofol total in-travenous anesthesia on clinical outcomes,including intraoperative indicators,postoperative complications,adverse effects,pain scores,and survival.METHODS This single-center retrospective cohort study included 204 patients who underw-ent radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer from February 2019 to December 2022.Patients were assigned to either the sevoflurane group(n=103)or the propofol group(n=101)based on intraoperative anesthetic regimen.Standardized protoc-ols for anesthesia management,intraoperative monitoring,and postoperative analgesia were applied.Baseline characteristics;intraoperative metrics;adverse events;complications;Visual Analog Scale(VAS)scores at 2,4,6,24,and 48 hours;and survival outcomes were retrospectively collected.Group comparisons were performed usingχ2 for categorical variables,t test for continuous variables,RESULTS Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics were similar between groups.No significant differences were observed in intraoperative indicators or most 30-day postoperative outcomes,including length of stay,emergency department visits,and readmission rates.The propofol group showed elevated mean VAS pain score at 24 hours postoperatively,but no differences were found at other time points.The propofol group also had significantly higher postoperative nausea incidence and transiently higher systolic/diastolic blood pressure and heart rate at the time of incision than the sevoflurane group.No significant differences were seen in overall rates or severity of postoperative complications,intraoperative adverse events,or in overall survival and progression-free survival.CONCLUSION In patients undergoing radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer,sevoflurane and propofol anesthesia demonstrated similar profiles regarding intraoperative safety,postoperative complications,adverse events,postoperative pain,and long-term survival.The selection of anesthesia can be personalized without significantly affecting periop-erative or oncologic outcomes.展开更多
BACKGROUND Elderly patients often display age-related physiological decline,which increases their susceptibility to complications during medical procedures.Therefore,it is clinically imperative to refine anesthetic pr...BACKGROUND Elderly patients often display age-related physiological decline,which increases their susceptibility to complications during medical procedures.Therefore,it is clinically imperative to refine anesthetic protocols for painless gastroscopy in this vulnerable population.AIM To explore the effects of the etomidate-propofol combination on anesthesia quality,compliance,and adverse reactions in elderly patients undergoing painless gastrointestinal endoscopy.METHODS A total of 103 elderly patients scheduled for painless gastrointestinal endoscopy at the Hospital of Wuhan Economic and Technological Development Zone(Hannan District)between October 2022 and October 2024 were enrolled.The participants were divided into a control group(n=50)receiving propofol anesthesia and an observation group(n=53)that received a combination of etomidate and propofol anesthesia.The anesthesia quality(including induction time,recovery time,and orientation recovery time),compliance,hemodynamic parameters(heart rate,oxygen saturation,systolic/diastolic blood pressure),adverse reactions(muscle tremors,injection pain,respiratory depression,hypotension,and nausea/vomiting),and analgesic and sedative effects[evaluated using the visual analog scale(VAS)and Ramsay score]were comparatively analyzed.RESULTS The observation group had significantly shorter anesthesia induction,recovery,and orientation recovery times than the control group.Moreover,the observation group showed higher compliance;greater hemodynamic stability at preanesthesia(T0),during anesthesia(T1),and postrecovery(T2)time points;and a significantly lower incidence of adverse reactions.The VAS and Ramsay scores at 5,30,and 60 minutes after anesthesia recovery were also significantly lower in the observation group than in the control group.CONCLUSION The etomidate-propofol combination for painless gastrointestinal endoscopy in elderly patients may provide superior anesthesia quality and improved compliance and safety,making it a promising approach for clinical application.展开更多
Background:Previous studies have demonstrated the underlying neurophysiologic mechanism during general anesthesia in adults.However,the mechanism of propofol-induced moderate-deep sedation(PMDS)in modulating pediatric...Background:Previous studies have demonstrated the underlying neurophysiologic mechanism during general anesthesia in adults.However,the mechanism of propofol-induced moderate-deep sedation(PMDS)in modulating pediatric neural activity remains unknown,which therefore was investigated in the present study based on functional magnetic resonance imaging(fMRI).Methods:A total of 41 children(5.10�1.14 years,male/female 21/20)with fMRI were employed to construct the functional connectivity network(FCN).The network communication,graph-theoretic properties,and network hub identification were statistically analyzed(t test and Bonferroni correction)between sedation(21 children)and awake(20 children)groups.All involved analyses were established on the whole-brain FCN and seven sub-networks,which included the default mode network(DMN),dorsal attentional network(DAN),salience network(SAN),auditory network(AUD),visual network(VIS),subcortical network(SUB),and other networks(Other).Results:Under PMDS,significant decreases in network communication were observed between SUB-VIS,SUB-DAN,and VIS-DAN,and between brain regions from the temporal lobe,limbic system,and subcortical tissues.However,no significant decrease in thalamus-related communication was observed.Most graph-theoretic properties were significantly decreased in the sedation group,and all graphical features of the DMN showed significant group differences.The superior parietal cortex with different neurological functions was identified as a network hub that was not greatly affected.Conclusions:Although the children had a depressed level of neural activity under PMDS,the crucial thalamus-related communication was maintained,and the network hub superior parietal cortex stayed active,which highlighted clinical prac-tices that the human body under PMDS is still perceptible to external stimuli and can be awakened by sound or touch.展开更多
Objective:To investigate the characteristics and significance of near-infrared brain function imaging in patients with depressive disorder after administration of propofol injection.Methods:A total of 28 subjects with...Objective:To investigate the characteristics and significance of near-infrared brain function imaging in patients with depressive disorder after administration of propofol injection.Methods:A total of 28 subjects with depressive disorder diagnosed according to DSM-5 criteria were selected from Xi’an Mental Health Center between January 2022 and January 2025.They were randomly divided into an experimental group(propofol group,n=14)and a control group(intralipid group,n=14)using a random number table.The changes in integral value(IV)and centroid value(CV)of the two patient groups before and after treatment were measured using functional near-infrared spectroscopy(fNIRS)technology.Results:There was no statistically significant difference in HAMD scores between the two groups of patients at 24 h before treatment(P>0.05).Repeated measures analysis of variance showed that both time factor(Ftime=32.237,Ptime<0.001),group factor(Fgroup=47.027,Pgroup<0.001),and their interaction(Finteraction=31.829,Pinteraction<0.001)were statistically significant.The centroid values of the frontal and temporal lobes were consistent at baseline before treatment,with no intra-group changes or inter-group differences at any time point after treatment(P>0.05).The integral values of the frontal and temporal lobes were consistent between the two groups at baseline before treatment,and both showed a time-dependent increase after treatment(Ptime<0.05).However,the increase in the experimental group was significantly greater than that in the control group(Pgroup<0.05),with a significant interaction effect(Pinteraction<0.05).Conclusion:fNIRS detected specific acute hemodynamic changes in the prefrontal and temporal regions of patients with depressive disorder after propofol intervention.These changes may be related to the mechanism of action of propofol.However,this study did not confirm a direct linear correlation between changes in integral/centroid values and the degree of clinical improvement in depressive symptoms.Propofol intervention combined with deep anesthesia rapidly improved depressive symptoms and was accompanied by enhanced hemodynamic activity in the prefrontal/temporal regions,though its specificity requires further validation.展开更多
Aim To investigate the population pharmacokinetics of propofol administered by TCI in Chinese elderly patients. Methods Thirty-two patients with ASA Ⅰ - Ⅱ , 65 - 82 years old, undergoing selective lower abdominal op...Aim To investigate the population pharmacokinetics of propofol administered by TCI in Chinese elderly patients. Methods Thirty-two patients with ASA Ⅰ - Ⅱ , 65 - 82 years old, undergoing selective lower abdominal operation were studied. Propofol was administered by target-controlled infusion with Marsh parameter. The target plasma concentration was 3 μg＇ mL^-1. Radial arterial blood samples were collected and analyzed by reversed phase HPLC with fluorescence detection. Population pharmacokinetic modeling was performed using NONMEM. Inter-individual variability and intra-individual variability of propofol were estimated for clearances and volumes of distribution. The effects of age, body weight, lean body mass, gender, height, hemoglobin, total protein, albumin, creatinine, alanine aminotrans ferase （ALT）, and aspartate aminotransferase （AST） were investigated. The effects of coadministered opioid drugs were also studied. Results The pharmacokinetics of propofol in the Chinese elderly patients was best described by a three-compartment open model. Lean body mass was found to be a covariate for system clearance at significant level （ P 〈 0.005）. The clearance decreased linearly with age as well （ P 〈 0. 005）. The apparent volume of distribution for deep peripheral compartment （V3） was influenced by gender. Elderly female patients showed a higher value for V3. Conclusion The pharmacokinetics of propofol administered by TCI in Chinese elderly patients can be well described by a three-compartment open model. Inclusion of age, lean body mass and gender as covariates significantly improved the model. To ensure the accuracy and precision of target-controlled infusion, the population pharmacokinetic model applied to the individual patient should be adjusted reasonably.展开更多
Novel mixed polymeric micelles formed by biocompatible polymers,mPEG-PLA and Pluronic P105,were fabricated and used as a nanocarrier to solubilize the poorly soluble anesthetic drug propofol.Propofol was added directl...Novel mixed polymeric micelles formed by biocompatible polymers,mPEG-PLA and Pluronic P105,were fabricated and used as a nanocarrier to solubilize the poorly soluble anesthetic drug propofol.Propofol was added directly to an aqueous solution of mPEG-PLA/Pluronic P105 mixed micelles and stirred into a micellar solution.The average particle size and size distribution of micelles were evaluated by the dynamic light scattering technology.Drug loading content,encapsulation efficiency and free drug concentration were determined by using ultracentrifugation and lyophilization.In vitro release characteristic of propofol formulation was investigated by dialysis method.The physical stability of mixed micelles was also assessed under storage condition（4 oC） after six months.Sleep-recovery studies in male Sprague-Dawley rats,at a dose of 10 mg/kg were performed to compare the pharmacodynamic profiles of propofol in mixed micelles with that of commercial lipid emulsion（CLE）.The results indicated that solubilization of propofol in the mixed micelles was more efficient than that in mPEG-PLA alone.Micelles with the optimized composition of mPEG-PLA/Pluronic P105/Propofol（10：4：5,w/w/w） had particle size of about 90 nm with narrow distribution（polydispersity index of about 0.2）.The content of free propofol in the aqueous phase of mixed micelles was significantly lower than that in CLE（P〈0.05）.There was no remarkable differences for particle size,polydispersity index,and free drug concentration when the mix micelles were stored at 4 oC for six months,suggesting that the propofol-loaded mixed micelles were stable for at least six months.The accumulative release of mixed micelles was significantly higher than that of CLE at the corresponding time points,suggesting that quick release rate for mixed micelles might produce favorable pharmacological effect.No significant differences in the unconsciousness time and recovery time of righting reflex were observed between the mixed micelles and CLE（P〉0.05）.In conclusion,the mixed micelle of mPEG-PLA and pluronic copolymer may be a promising candidate for intravenous delivery of propofol in clinic.展开更多
BACKGROUND Many studies have addressed safety and effectiveness of non-anaesthesiologist propofol sedation(NAPS)for gastrointestinal(GI)endoscopy Target controlled infusion(TCI)is claimed to provide an optimal sedatio...BACKGROUND Many studies have addressed safety and effectiveness of non-anaesthesiologist propofol sedation(NAPS)for gastrointestinal(GI)endoscopy Target controlled infusion(TCI)is claimed to provide an optimal sedation regimen by avoiding under-or oversedation.AIM To assess safety and performance of propofol TCI sedation in comparison with nurse-administered bolus-sedation.METHODS Fouty-five patients undergoing endoscopy under TCI propofol sedation were prospectively included from November 2016 to May 2017 and compared to 87 patients retrospectively included that underwent endoscopy with NAPS.Patients were matched for age and endoscopic procedure.We recorded time of sedation and endoscopy,dosage of medication and adverse events.RESULTS There was a significant reduction in dose per time of propofol administered in the TCI group,compared to the NAPS group(8.2±2.7 mg/min vs 9.3±3.4 mg/min;P=0.046).The time needed to provide adequate sedation levels was slightly but significantly lower in the control group(5.3±2.7 min vs 7.7±3.3 min;P<0.001),nonetheless the total endoscopy time was similar in both groups.No differences between TCI and bolus-sedation was observed for mean total-dosage of propofol rate as well as adverse events.CONCLUSION This study indicates that sedation using TCI for GI endoscopy reduces the dose of propofol necessary per minute of endoscopy.This may translate into less adverse events.However,further and randomized trials need to confirm this trend.展开更多
AIM: To assess the use of dezocine combined with propofol for the anesthetization of patients undergoing indolent colonoscopy.METHODS: A cross-sectional survey of patients undergoing indolent colonoscopy in the Xinjia...AIM: To assess the use of dezocine combined with propofol for the anesthetization of patients undergoing indolent colonoscopy.METHODS: A cross-sectional survey of patients undergoing indolent colonoscopy in the Xinjiang people's Hospital was conducted from April 1 to April 30, 2015. The survey collected patient general information and anesthesia data, including overall medical experience and pain management. Thirty minutes after colonoscopy surgery, samples of venous blood were collected and the biochemical indicators of gastrointestinal function were analyzed. RESULTS: There were 98 female and 62 male respondents. Indolent colonoscopy was found to be more suitable for mid to older-aged patients. The necessary conditions for the diagnosis of digestive diseases were required in 65 of the 73 inpatients. Adverse reactions to the intraoperative process included two cases of body movement and two cases of respiratory depression. Gastrin and vasoactive intestinal peptide levels were slightly increased. However, somatostatin and endothelin levels were slightly decreased. CONCLUSION: This study revealed that dezocine combined with propofol can be successfully used for the anesthetization of indolent colonoscopy patients without pain and should be widely used.展开更多
BACKGROUND Gastroscopy and colonoscopy are important and common endoscopic methods for the diagnosis and treatment of gastrointestinal and colorectal diseases.However,endoscopy is usually associated with adverse react...BACKGROUND Gastroscopy and colonoscopy are important and common endoscopic methods for the diagnosis and treatment of gastrointestinal and colorectal diseases.However,endoscopy is usually associated with adverse reactions such as nervousness,nausea,vomiting,choking cough,and pain.Severe discomfort,such as vomiting,coughing,or body movement,may lead to aggravation of a preexisting condition or even interruption of examination or treatment,especially in some critically ill patients with physiological dysfunction(e.g.,cardiovascular or respiratory disease).The optimal methods for inducing analgesia and sedation in endoscopy are areas of ongoing debate;nevertheless,determining an appropriate regimen of sedation and analgesia is important.AIM To evaluate the effects of propofol combined with dezocine,sufentanil,or fentanyl in painless gastroscopy and colonoscopy.METHODS Four hundred patients were randomly assigned to one of four groups for anesthesia:intravenous dezocine,sufentanil,fentanyl,or saline.Propofol was administered intravenously for induction and maintenance of anesthesia.RESULTS The dosage of propofol in the dezocine group was significantly lower than those in other groups(P<0.01).Bispectral index and Steward score(0-6 points,an unresponsive,immobile patient whose airway requires maintenance to a fully recovered patient)after eye opening in the dezocine group were significantly higher than those in other groups(P<0.01).Awakening time and postoperative pain score(0-10 points,no pain to unbearable pain)in the dezocine group were significantly lower than those in other groups(P<0.01).Mean arterial pressure and pulse oxygen saturation in the dezocine group were significantly more stable at various time points(before dosing,disappearance of eyelash reflex,and wakeup)than those in other groups(P<0.01).The rates of hypopnea,jaw thrust,body movements,and usage of vasoactive drugs in the dezocine group were significantly lower than those in other groups(P<0.01).Additionally,the rates of reflex coughing,nausea,and vomiting were not statistically different between the four groups(P>0.05).CONCLUSION The combination of propofol and dezocine can decrease propofol dosage,reduce the risk for the development of inhibitory effects on the respiratory and cardiovascular systems,increase analgesic effect,decrease body movement,shorten awakening time,and improve awakening quality.展开更多
AIM To investigate the efficacy and safety of a combination of sufentanil and propofol injection in patients undergoing endoscopic injection sclerotherapy(EIS) for esophageal varices(EVs). METHODS Patients with severe...AIM To investigate the efficacy and safety of a combination of sufentanil and propofol injection in patients undergoing endoscopic injection sclerotherapy(EIS) for esophageal varices(EVs). METHODS Patients with severe EVs who underwent EIS with sufentanil and propofol anesthesia between April 2016 and July 2016 at our hospital were reviewed. Although EIS and sequential therapy were performed under endotracheal intubation, we only evaluated the efficacy and safety of anesthesia for the first EIS procedure. Patients were intravenously treated with 0.5-1 μg/kg sufentanil. Anesthesia was induced with 1-2 mg/kg propofol and maintained using 2-5 mg/kg per hour of propofol. Information, regarding age, sex, weight, American Association of Anesthesiologists(ASA) physical status, Child-Turcotte-Pugh(CTP) classification, indications, preanesthetic problems, endoscopic procedure, successful completion of the procedure, anesthesia time, recovery time, and anesthetic agents, was recorded. Adverse events, including hypotension, hypertension, bradycardia, and hypoxia, were also noted.RESULTS Propofol and sufentanil anesthesia was provided in 182 procedures involving 140 men and 42 women aged 56.1± 11.7 years(range, 25-83 years). The patients weighed 71.4 ± 10.7 kg(range, 45-95 kg) and had ASA physical status classifications of Ⅱ(79 patients) or Ⅲ(103 patients). Ninety-five patients had a CTP classification of A and 87 had a CTP classification of B. Intravenous anesthesia was successful in all cases. The mean anesthesia time was 33.1 ± 5.8 min. The mean recovery time was 12.3 ± 3.7 min. Hypotension occurred in two patients(1.1%, 2/182). No patient showed hypertension during the endoscopic therapy procedure. Bradycardia occurred in one patient(0.5%, 1/182), and hypoxia occurred in one patient(0.5%, 1/182). All complications were easily treated with no adverse sequelae. All endoscopic procedures were completed successfully.CONCLUSION The combined use of propofol and sufentanil injection in endotracheal intubation-assisted EIS for EVs is effective and safe.展开更多
Background: Sevoflurane and propofol are effective cardioprotective anaesthetic agents, though the cardioprotection of propofol has not been shown in humans. Their roles and underlying mechanisms in anesthetic postcon...Background: Sevoflurane and propofol are effective cardioprotective anaesthetic agents, though the cardioprotection of propofol has not been shown in humans. Their roles and underlying mechanisms in anesthetic postconditioning are unclear. Mitochondrial permeability transition pore (MPTP) opening is a major cause of ischemia-reperfusion injury. Here we investigated sevoflurane- and propofol-induced postconditioning and their relationship with MPTP. Methods: Isolated perfused rat hearts were exposed to 40 min of ischemia followed by 1 h of reperfusion. During the first 15 min of reperfusion, hearts were treated with either control buffer (CTRL group) or buffer containing 20 μmol/L atractyloside (ATR group), 3% (v/v) sevoflurane (SPC group), 50 μmol/L propofol (PPC group), or the combination of atractyloside with respective anesthetics (SPC+ATR and PPC+ATR groups). Infarct size was determined by dividing the total necrotic area of the left ventricle by the total left ventricular slice area (percent necrotic area). Results: Hearts treated with sevoflurane or propofol showed significantly better recovery of coronary flow, end-diastolic pressures, left ventricular developed pressure and derivatives compared with controls. Sevoflurane resulted in more protective alteration of hemodynamics at most time point of reperfusion than propofol. These improvements were paralleled with the reduction of lactate dehydrogenase release and the decrease of infarct size (SPC vs CTRL: (17.48±2.70)% vs (48.47±6.03)%, P<0.05; PPC vs CTRL: (35.60±2.10)% vs (48.47±6.03)%, P<0.05). SPC group had less infarct size than PPC group (SPC vs PPC: (17.48±2.70)% vs (35.60±2.10)%, P<0.05). Atractyloside coadministration attenuated or completely blocked the cardioprotective effect of postconditioning of sevoflurane and propofol. Conclusion: Postconditioning of sevoflurane and propofol has cardio-protective effect against ischemia-reperfusion injury of heart, which is associated with inhibition of MPTP opening. Compared to propofol, sevoflurane provides superior protection of functional recovery and infarct size.展开更多
AIM： To analyze the hemodynamic and respiratory effects of propofol on patients undergoing gastroscopy and colonoscopy. METHODS： In this prospective study, conducted over a period of three years, 1,104 patients refe...AIM： To analyze the hemodynamic and respiratory effects of propofol on patients undergoing gastroscopy and colonoscopy. METHODS： In this prospective study, conducted over a period of three years, 1,104 patients referred for a same day GI endoscopy procedure were analyzed. All patients were given a propofol bolus （0.5-1.5 mg/kg）. Arterial blood pressure （BP） was monitored at 3 rain intervals and heart rate and oxygen saturation （SpO2） were recorded continuously by pulse oximetry. Analyzed data acquisition was carried out before, during, and after the procedure. RESULTS： A statistically significant reduction in mean arterial pressure was demonstrated （P〈0.001） when compared to pre-intervention values, but severe hypotension, defined as a systolic blood pressure below 60mmHg, was noted in only 5 patients （0.5%）. Oxygen saturation decreased from 96.5% to 94.4 % （P〈0.001）. A critical decrease in oxygen saturation （〈90%） was documented in 27 patients （2.4%）. CONCLUSION： Our results showed that propofol provided good sedation with excellent pain control, a short recovery time and no significant hemodynamic side effelts if carefully titrated. All the patients （and especially ASA Ⅲ group） require monitoring and care of an anesthesiologist.展开更多
Compared to standard endoscopy,endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography(ERCP)and endoscopic ultrasound(EUS)are often lengthier and more complex,thus requiring higher doses of sedatives for patient comfort and co...Compared to standard endoscopy,endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography(ERCP)and endoscopic ultrasound(EUS)are often lengthier and more complex,thus requiring higher doses of sedatives for patient comfort and compliance.The aim of this review is to provide the reader with information regarding the use,safety profile,and merits of propofol for sedation in advanced endoscopic procedures like ERCP and EUS,based on the current literature.展开更多
BACKGROUND: Propofol is one of the extensively and commonly used intravenous anesthetics and has the ability to influence the proliferation, motility, and invasiveness of many cancer cells. In this study, the effects ...BACKGROUND: Propofol is one of the extensively and commonly used intravenous anesthetics and has the ability to influence the proliferation, motility, and invasiveness of many cancer cells. In this study, the effects of propofol on hepatocellular carcinoma cells invasion ability were examined. METHODS: We assessed the invasion ability of HepG2 cells in vitro by determining enzyme activity and protein expression of MMP-9 using gelatin zymography assay and Western blot. The real-time PCR was used to evaluate the effect of propofol on microRNA-199a (miR-199a) expression, and miR-199a-2 precursor to evaluate whether over-expression of miR-199a can affect MMP-9 expression. Finally, the effect of miR-199a on propofol-induced anti-tumor activity using anti-miR-199a was assessed. RESULTS: Propofol significantly elevated the expression of miR-199a and inhibited the invasiveness of HepG2 cells. Propofol also efficiently decreased enzyme activity and protein expression of MMP-9. Moreover, the over-expression of miR-199a decreased MMP-9 protein level. Interestingly, the neutralization of miR-199a by anti-miR-199a antibody reversed the effect of propofol on alleviation of tumor invasiveness and inhibition of MMP-9 activity in HepG2 cells. CONCLUSION: Propofol decreases hepatocellular carcinoma cell invasiveness, which is partly due to the down-regulation of MMP-9 expression by miR-199a.展开更多
AIM:To investigate the effect of propofol on human pancreatic cells and the molecular mechanism of propofol action.METHODS:We used the human pancreatic cancer cell line MIAPaCa-2 for in vitro studies measuring growth ...AIM:To investigate the effect of propofol on human pancreatic cells and the molecular mechanism of propofol action.METHODS:We used the human pancreatic cancer cell line MIAPaCa-2 for in vitro studies measuring growth inhibition and degree of apoptotic cell death induced by propofol alone,gemcitabine alone,or propofol followed by gemcitabine.All experiments were conducted in triplicate and carried out on three or more separate occasions.Data were means of the three or more independent experiments±SE.Statistically significant differences were determined by two-tailed unpaired Student’s t test and defined as P<0.05.RESULTS:Pretreatment of cells with propofol for 24 h followed by gemcitabine resulted in 24%-75% growth inhibition compared with 6%-18%when gemcitabine was used alone.Overall growth inhibition was directly correlated with apoptotic cell death.We also showed that propofol potentiated gemcitabine-induced killing by downregulation of nuclear factor-κB(NF-κB).In contrast,NF-κB was upregulated when pancreatic cancer cells were exposed to gemcitabine alone,suggesting a potential mechanism of acquired chemoresistance.CONCLUSION:Inactivation of the NF-κB signaling pathway by propofol might abrogate gemcitabineinduced activation of NF-κB,resulting in chemosensitization of pancreatic tumors to gemcitabine.展开更多
Propofol preconditioning has been shown to provide neuroprotection against spinal ischemia/reperfusion injury. In this study, spinal cord ischemia/repeffusion injury was induced by blocking the abdominal aorta in rabb...Propofol preconditioning has been shown to provide neuroprotection against spinal ischemia/reperfusion injury. In this study, spinal cord ischemia/repeffusion injury was induced by blocking the abdominal aorta in rabbits for 40 minutes. Results showed that the co-application of propofol preconditioning and postconditioning regimen ameliorated pathological injury of the ischemic spinal cord and suppressed the elevation of malondialdehyde levels and increased superoxide dismutase activities in the spinal cord tissues. Co-application of propofol preconditioning and postconditioning resulted in potent protective effects against spinal cord ischemia/reperfusion injury and prolonged the spinal cord＇s tolerance to ischemia. This protection was associated with the anti-lipid peroxidation capacity of the spinal cord tissues.展开更多
BACKGROUND:In general,the dose requirement and complications of propofol are lower when used in the diluted form than in the undiluted form.The aim of this study was to determine the dose requirement and complications...BACKGROUND:In general,the dose requirement and complications of propofol are lower when used in the diluted form than in the undiluted form.The aim of this study was to determine the dose requirement and complications of diluted and undiluted propofol for deep sedation in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.METHODS:Eighty-six patients were randomly assigned to either group D (diluted propofol) or U (undiluted propofol).All patients were sedated with 0.02-0.03 mg/kg midazolam (total dose ≤2 mg for age <70 years and 1 mg for age ≥70) and 0.5-1 μg/kg fentanyl (total dose ≤75 μg for age <70 and ≤50 μg for age ≥70).Patients in group U (42) were sedated with standard undiluted propofol (10 mg/mL).Patients in group D (44) were sedated with diluted propofol (5 mg/mL).All patients in both groups were monitored for the depth of sedation using the Narcotrend system.The primary outcome variable was the total dose of propofol used during the procedure.The secondary outcome variables were complications during and immediately after the procedure,and recovery time.RESULTS:All endoscopies were completed successfully.Mean propofol doses per body weight and per body weight per hour in groups D and U were 3.0 mg/kg,6.2 mg/kg per hour and 4.7 mg/kg,8.0 mg/kg per hour,respectively.The mean dose of propofol,expressed as total dose,dose/kg or dose/kg per hour and the recovery time were not significantly different between the two groups.Sedation-related adverse events during and immediately after the procedure were higher in group U (42.9%) than in group D (18.2%) (P=0.013).CONCLUSIONS:Propofol requirement and recovery time in the diluted and undiluted propofol groups were comparable.However,the sedation-related hypotension was significantly lower in the diluted group than the undiluted group.展开更多
基金supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China(82101273)the Second Affiliated Hospital of the Army Medical University Incubation Program for Young Doctoral Talents(2023YQB007).
文摘Dear Editor,General anesthetics play a pivotal role in inducing a safe and reversible loss of consciousness in patients,the importance of which cannot be overstated[1].Among the intravenous anesthetics,propofol stands out for its rapid onset and swift systemic clearance,effectively eliminating the prolonged sedation associated with earlier agents[2].
文摘BACKGROUND Propofol has been widely used in bidirectional gastrointestinal endoscopy sedation;however,it frequently leads to cardiovascular adverse events and respiratory depression.Propofol target-controlled infusion(TCI)can provide safe sedation but may require higher dosages of propofol.On the contrary,etomidate offers hemodynamic stability.AIM To evaluate the effect of different dose etomidate added to propofol TCI sedation during same-visit bidirectional endoscopy.METHODS A total of 330 patients from Fujian Provincial Hospital were randomly divided into three groups:P,0.1EP,and 0.15EP.Patients in the P group received propofol TCI only,with an initial effect-site concentration of the propofol TCI system of 3.0 mg/mL.Patients in the 0.1EP and 0.15EP groups received 0.1 and 0.15 mg/kg etomidate intravenous injection,respectively,followed by propofol TCI.RESULTS Patients in the 0.15EP group had higher mean blood pressure after induction than the other groups(P group:78 mmHg,0.1EP group:82 mmHg,0.15EP group:88 mmHg;P<0.05).Total doses of propofol consumption significantly decreased in the 0.15EP group compared with that in the other groups(P group:260.6 mg,0.1EP group:228.1 mg,0.15EP group:201.2 mg;P<0.05).The induction time was longer in the P group than in the other groups(P group:1.9±0.7 minutes,0.1EP group:1.2±0.4 minutes,0.15EP group:1.1±0.3 minutes;P<0.01).The recovery time was shorter in the 0.15EP group than in the other groups(P group:4.8±2.1 minutes,0.1EP group:4.5±1.6 minutes,0.15EP group:3.9±1.4 minutes;P<0.01).The incidence of hypotension(P group:36.4%,0.1EP group:29.1%,0.15EP group:11.8%;P<0.01)and injection pain was lower in the 0.15EP group than in the other groups(P<0.05).Furthermore,the incidence of respiratory depression was lower in the 0.15EP group than in the P group(P<0.05).Additionally,the satisfaction of the patient,endoscopist,and anesthesiologist was higher in the 0.15EP group than in the other groups(P<0.05).CONCLUSION Our findings suggest that 0.15 mg/kg etomidate plus propofol TCI can significantly reduce propofol consumption,which is followed by fewer cardiovascular adverse events and respiratory depression,along with higher patient,endoscopist,and anesthesiologist satisfaction.
文摘Cancer is one of the most important health problems that deeply affects all humanity and will have groundbreaking consequences in human history with its elimination.Gastrointestinal cancers,including colon and rectum,stomach,liver,pancreatic,and esophageal,account for 26%of the global cancer incidence and 35%of cancer-related deaths.Unfortunately,it is estimated that today’s high incidence and mortality rates will increase by 58%and 73%by 2040,respectively.Although the treatment process includes novel options such as immunotherapy in addition to classical options with a multidisciplinary approach,surgical treatment under general anesthesia remains the leading option.Considering a long-lasting cancer process,it is quite surprising that a very short-term anesthetic adminis-tration can have various effects on cancer cell behavior.Various anesthetic approaches such as regional blocks used in pain management,the use of ane-sthetic adjuvants such asβ-adrenoceptor antagonists,nonsteroidal anti-inflam-matory drugs,and intravenous lidocaine,and the choice of anesthetic drugs seem to have potential effects on long-term cancer outcomes.Propofol is an intravenous anesthetic drug that is used for both induction and maintenance of general anesthesia.Many in vitro and clinical studies examining the effects of propofol comparatively with other anesthetic agents on tumor recurrence and metastasis revealed possible effects on tumor cell signaling,the immune response,and the modulation of the neuroendocrine stress response.However,the evidence from all these in vitro and clinical studies is different,complicated,and inconsistent.The general effects of propofol on the behavioral patterns,growth,and metastasis of gastrointestinal tumor cells,as well as the clinical features and consequences resulting from these effects,constitute the subject of this review.
文摘BACKGROUND Gastric cancer is a major global health issue,and the perioperative period critic-ally influences patient outcomes.The different effects of sevoflurane inhalation anesthesia and propofol total intravenous anesthesia on intraoperative stability,postoperative complications,and long-term oncologic outcomes in patients with gastric cancer undergoing radical gastrectomy remain unclear.AIM To compare the effects of sevoflurane inhalation anesthesia and propofol total in-travenous anesthesia on clinical outcomes,including intraoperative indicators,postoperative complications,adverse effects,pain scores,and survival.METHODS This single-center retrospective cohort study included 204 patients who underw-ent radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer from February 2019 to December 2022.Patients were assigned to either the sevoflurane group(n=103)or the propofol group(n=101)based on intraoperative anesthetic regimen.Standardized protoc-ols for anesthesia management,intraoperative monitoring,and postoperative analgesia were applied.Baseline characteristics;intraoperative metrics;adverse events;complications;Visual Analog Scale(VAS)scores at 2,4,6,24,and 48 hours;and survival outcomes were retrospectively collected.Group comparisons were performed usingχ2 for categorical variables,t test for continuous variables,RESULTS Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics were similar between groups.No significant differences were observed in intraoperative indicators or most 30-day postoperative outcomes,including length of stay,emergency department visits,and readmission rates.The propofol group showed elevated mean VAS pain score at 24 hours postoperatively,but no differences were found at other time points.The propofol group also had significantly higher postoperative nausea incidence and transiently higher systolic/diastolic blood pressure and heart rate at the time of incision than the sevoflurane group.No significant differences were seen in overall rates or severity of postoperative complications,intraoperative adverse events,or in overall survival and progression-free survival.CONCLUSION In patients undergoing radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer,sevoflurane and propofol anesthesia demonstrated similar profiles regarding intraoperative safety,postoperative complications,adverse events,postoperative pain,and long-term survival.The selection of anesthesia can be personalized without significantly affecting periop-erative or oncologic outcomes.
文摘BACKGROUND Elderly patients often display age-related physiological decline,which increases their susceptibility to complications during medical procedures.Therefore,it is clinically imperative to refine anesthetic protocols for painless gastroscopy in this vulnerable population.AIM To explore the effects of the etomidate-propofol combination on anesthesia quality,compliance,and adverse reactions in elderly patients undergoing painless gastrointestinal endoscopy.METHODS A total of 103 elderly patients scheduled for painless gastrointestinal endoscopy at the Hospital of Wuhan Economic and Technological Development Zone(Hannan District)between October 2022 and October 2024 were enrolled.The participants were divided into a control group(n=50)receiving propofol anesthesia and an observation group(n=53)that received a combination of etomidate and propofol anesthesia.The anesthesia quality(including induction time,recovery time,and orientation recovery time),compliance,hemodynamic parameters(heart rate,oxygen saturation,systolic/diastolic blood pressure),adverse reactions(muscle tremors,injection pain,respiratory depression,hypotension,and nausea/vomiting),and analgesic and sedative effects[evaluated using the visual analog scale(VAS)and Ramsay score]were comparatively analyzed.RESULTS The observation group had significantly shorter anesthesia induction,recovery,and orientation recovery times than the control group.Moreover,the observation group showed higher compliance;greater hemodynamic stability at preanesthesia(T0),during anesthesia(T1),and postrecovery(T2)time points;and a significantly lower incidence of adverse reactions.The VAS and Ramsay scores at 5,30,and 60 minutes after anesthesia recovery were also significantly lower in the observation group than in the control group.CONCLUSION The etomidate-propofol combination for painless gastrointestinal endoscopy in elderly patients may provide superior anesthesia quality and improved compliance and safety,making it a promising approach for clinical application.
基金supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province,ZR2024MH072Open Project of Key Laboratory of Medical Imaging and Artificial Intelligence of Hunan Province,Xiangnan University,YXZN2022002+2 种基金Projects of Xiamen Scientific and Technological Plan,3502Z20199096 and 3502Z20209220the National Natural Science Foundation of China,61802330the Yantai City Science and Technology Innovation Development Plan,2023XDRH006.
文摘Background:Previous studies have demonstrated the underlying neurophysiologic mechanism during general anesthesia in adults.However,the mechanism of propofol-induced moderate-deep sedation(PMDS)in modulating pediatric neural activity remains unknown,which therefore was investigated in the present study based on functional magnetic resonance imaging(fMRI).Methods:A total of 41 children(5.10�1.14 years,male/female 21/20)with fMRI were employed to construct the functional connectivity network(FCN).The network communication,graph-theoretic properties,and network hub identification were statistically analyzed(t test and Bonferroni correction)between sedation(21 children)and awake(20 children)groups.All involved analyses were established on the whole-brain FCN and seven sub-networks,which included the default mode network(DMN),dorsal attentional network(DAN),salience network(SAN),auditory network(AUD),visual network(VIS),subcortical network(SUB),and other networks(Other).Results:Under PMDS,significant decreases in network communication were observed between SUB-VIS,SUB-DAN,and VIS-DAN,and between brain regions from the temporal lobe,limbic system,and subcortical tissues.However,no significant decrease in thalamus-related communication was observed.Most graph-theoretic properties were significantly decreased in the sedation group,and all graphical features of the DMN showed significant group differences.The superior parietal cortex with different neurological functions was identified as a network hub that was not greatly affected.Conclusions:Although the children had a depressed level of neural activity under PMDS,the crucial thalamus-related communication was maintained,and the network hub superior parietal cortex stayed active,which highlighted clinical prac-tices that the human body under PMDS is still perceptible to external stimuli and can be awakened by sound or touch.
基金A Randomized Single-Blind Controlled Trial of Propofol Injection for Depressive Disorder,Xi’an Municipal Science and Technology Bureau(Project No.:22YXYJ0035)。
文摘Objective:To investigate the characteristics and significance of near-infrared brain function imaging in patients with depressive disorder after administration of propofol injection.Methods:A total of 28 subjects with depressive disorder diagnosed according to DSM-5 criteria were selected from Xi’an Mental Health Center between January 2022 and January 2025.They were randomly divided into an experimental group(propofol group,n=14)and a control group(intralipid group,n=14)using a random number table.The changes in integral value(IV)and centroid value(CV)of the two patient groups before and after treatment were measured using functional near-infrared spectroscopy(fNIRS)technology.Results:There was no statistically significant difference in HAMD scores between the two groups of patients at 24 h before treatment(P>0.05).Repeated measures analysis of variance showed that both time factor(Ftime=32.237,Ptime<0.001),group factor(Fgroup=47.027,Pgroup<0.001),and their interaction(Finteraction=31.829,Pinteraction<0.001)were statistically significant.The centroid values of the frontal and temporal lobes were consistent at baseline before treatment,with no intra-group changes or inter-group differences at any time point after treatment(P>0.05).The integral values of the frontal and temporal lobes were consistent between the two groups at baseline before treatment,and both showed a time-dependent increase after treatment(Ptime<0.05).However,the increase in the experimental group was significantly greater than that in the control group(Pgroup<0.05),with a significant interaction effect(Pinteraction<0.05).Conclusion:fNIRS detected specific acute hemodynamic changes in the prefrontal and temporal regions of patients with depressive disorder after propofol intervention.These changes may be related to the mechanism of action of propofol.However,this study did not confirm a direct linear correlation between changes in integral/centroid values and the degree of clinical improvement in depressive symptoms.Propofol intervention combined with deep anesthesia rapidly improved depressive symptoms and was accompanied by enhanced hemodynamic activity in the prefrontal/temporal regions,though its specificity requires further validation.
文摘Aim To investigate the population pharmacokinetics of propofol administered by TCI in Chinese elderly patients. Methods Thirty-two patients with ASA Ⅰ - Ⅱ , 65 - 82 years old, undergoing selective lower abdominal operation were studied. Propofol was administered by target-controlled infusion with Marsh parameter. The target plasma concentration was 3 μg＇ mL^-1. Radial arterial blood samples were collected and analyzed by reversed phase HPLC with fluorescence detection. Population pharmacokinetic modeling was performed using NONMEM. Inter-individual variability and intra-individual variability of propofol were estimated for clearances and volumes of distribution. The effects of age, body weight, lean body mass, gender, height, hemoglobin, total protein, albumin, creatinine, alanine aminotrans ferase （ALT）, and aspartate aminotransferase （AST） were investigated. The effects of coadministered opioid drugs were also studied. Results The pharmacokinetics of propofol in the Chinese elderly patients was best described by a three-compartment open model. Lean body mass was found to be a covariate for system clearance at significant level （ P 〈 0.005）. The clearance decreased linearly with age as well （ P 〈 0. 005）. The apparent volume of distribution for deep peripheral compartment （V3） was influenced by gender. Elderly female patients showed a higher value for V3. Conclusion The pharmacokinetics of propofol administered by TCI in Chinese elderly patients can be well described by a three-compartment open model. Inclusion of age, lean body mass and gender as covariates significantly improved the model. To ensure the accuracy and precision of target-controlled infusion, the population pharmacokinetic model applied to the individual patient should be adjusted reasonably.
基金National Development of Significant New Drugs(New Preparation and New Technology,Grant No. 2009zx09310-001)the National Basic Research Program of China (973 program,Grant No. 2009CB930300)
文摘Novel mixed polymeric micelles formed by biocompatible polymers,mPEG-PLA and Pluronic P105,were fabricated and used as a nanocarrier to solubilize the poorly soluble anesthetic drug propofol.Propofol was added directly to an aqueous solution of mPEG-PLA/Pluronic P105 mixed micelles and stirred into a micellar solution.The average particle size and size distribution of micelles were evaluated by the dynamic light scattering technology.Drug loading content,encapsulation efficiency and free drug concentration were determined by using ultracentrifugation and lyophilization.In vitro release characteristic of propofol formulation was investigated by dialysis method.The physical stability of mixed micelles was also assessed under storage condition（4 oC） after six months.Sleep-recovery studies in male Sprague-Dawley rats,at a dose of 10 mg/kg were performed to compare the pharmacodynamic profiles of propofol in mixed micelles with that of commercial lipid emulsion（CLE）.The results indicated that solubilization of propofol in the mixed micelles was more efficient than that in mPEG-PLA alone.Micelles with the optimized composition of mPEG-PLA/Pluronic P105/Propofol（10：4：5,w/w/w） had particle size of about 90 nm with narrow distribution（polydispersity index of about 0.2）.The content of free propofol in the aqueous phase of mixed micelles was significantly lower than that in CLE（P〈0.05）.There was no remarkable differences for particle size,polydispersity index,and free drug concentration when the mix micelles were stored at 4 oC for six months,suggesting that the propofol-loaded mixed micelles were stable for at least six months.The accumulative release of mixed micelles was significantly higher than that of CLE at the corresponding time points,suggesting that quick release rate for mixed micelles might produce favorable pharmacological effect.No significant differences in the unconsciousness time and recovery time of righting reflex were observed between the mixed micelles and CLE（P〉0.05）.In conclusion,the mixed micelle of mPEG-PLA and pluronic copolymer may be a promising candidate for intravenous delivery of propofol in clinic.
文摘BACKGROUND Many studies have addressed safety and effectiveness of non-anaesthesiologist propofol sedation(NAPS)for gastrointestinal(GI)endoscopy Target controlled infusion(TCI)is claimed to provide an optimal sedation regimen by avoiding under-or oversedation.AIM To assess safety and performance of propofol TCI sedation in comparison with nurse-administered bolus-sedation.METHODS Fouty-five patients undergoing endoscopy under TCI propofol sedation were prospectively included from November 2016 to May 2017 and compared to 87 patients retrospectively included that underwent endoscopy with NAPS.Patients were matched for age and endoscopic procedure.We recorded time of sedation and endoscopy,dosage of medication and adverse events.RESULTS There was a significant reduction in dose per time of propofol administered in the TCI group,compared to the NAPS group(8.2±2.7 mg/min vs 9.3±3.4 mg/min;P=0.046).The time needed to provide adequate sedation levels was slightly but significantly lower in the control group(5.3±2.7 min vs 7.7±3.3 min;P<0.001),nonetheless the total endoscopy time was similar in both groups.No differences between TCI and bolus-sedation was observed for mean total-dosage of propofol rate as well as adverse events.CONCLUSION This study indicates that sedation using TCI for GI endoscopy reduces the dose of propofol necessary per minute of endoscopy.This may translate into less adverse events.However,further and randomized trials need to confirm this trend.
文摘AIM: To assess the use of dezocine combined with propofol for the anesthetization of patients undergoing indolent colonoscopy.METHODS: A cross-sectional survey of patients undergoing indolent colonoscopy in the Xinjiang people's Hospital was conducted from April 1 to April 30, 2015. The survey collected patient general information and anesthesia data, including overall medical experience and pain management. Thirty minutes after colonoscopy surgery, samples of venous blood were collected and the biochemical indicators of gastrointestinal function were analyzed. RESULTS: There were 98 female and 62 male respondents. Indolent colonoscopy was found to be more suitable for mid to older-aged patients. The necessary conditions for the diagnosis of digestive diseases were required in 65 of the 73 inpatients. Adverse reactions to the intraoperative process included two cases of body movement and two cases of respiratory depression. Gastrin and vasoactive intestinal peptide levels were slightly increased. However, somatostatin and endothelin levels were slightly decreased. CONCLUSION: This study revealed that dezocine combined with propofol can be successfully used for the anesthetization of indolent colonoscopy patients without pain and should be widely used.
文摘BACKGROUND Gastroscopy and colonoscopy are important and common endoscopic methods for the diagnosis and treatment of gastrointestinal and colorectal diseases.However,endoscopy is usually associated with adverse reactions such as nervousness,nausea,vomiting,choking cough,and pain.Severe discomfort,such as vomiting,coughing,or body movement,may lead to aggravation of a preexisting condition or even interruption of examination or treatment,especially in some critically ill patients with physiological dysfunction(e.g.,cardiovascular or respiratory disease).The optimal methods for inducing analgesia and sedation in endoscopy are areas of ongoing debate;nevertheless,determining an appropriate regimen of sedation and analgesia is important.AIM To evaluate the effects of propofol combined with dezocine,sufentanil,or fentanyl in painless gastroscopy and colonoscopy.METHODS Four hundred patients were randomly assigned to one of four groups for anesthesia:intravenous dezocine,sufentanil,fentanyl,or saline.Propofol was administered intravenously for induction and maintenance of anesthesia.RESULTS The dosage of propofol in the dezocine group was significantly lower than those in other groups(P<0.01).Bispectral index and Steward score(0-6 points,an unresponsive,immobile patient whose airway requires maintenance to a fully recovered patient)after eye opening in the dezocine group were significantly higher than those in other groups(P<0.01).Awakening time and postoperative pain score(0-10 points,no pain to unbearable pain)in the dezocine group were significantly lower than those in other groups(P<0.01).Mean arterial pressure and pulse oxygen saturation in the dezocine group were significantly more stable at various time points(before dosing,disappearance of eyelash reflex,and wakeup)than those in other groups(P<0.01).The rates of hypopnea,jaw thrust,body movements,and usage of vasoactive drugs in the dezocine group were significantly lower than those in other groups(P<0.01).Additionally,the rates of reflex coughing,nausea,and vomiting were not statistically different between the four groups(P>0.05).CONCLUSION The combination of propofol and dezocine can decrease propofol dosage,reduce the risk for the development of inhibitory effects on the respiratory and cardiovascular systems,increase analgesic effect,decrease body movement,shorten awakening time,and improve awakening quality.
文摘AIM To investigate the efficacy and safety of a combination of sufentanil and propofol injection in patients undergoing endoscopic injection sclerotherapy(EIS) for esophageal varices(EVs). METHODS Patients with severe EVs who underwent EIS with sufentanil and propofol anesthesia between April 2016 and July 2016 at our hospital were reviewed. Although EIS and sequential therapy were performed under endotracheal intubation, we only evaluated the efficacy and safety of anesthesia for the first EIS procedure. Patients were intravenously treated with 0.5-1 μg/kg sufentanil. Anesthesia was induced with 1-2 mg/kg propofol and maintained using 2-5 mg/kg per hour of propofol. Information, regarding age, sex, weight, American Association of Anesthesiologists(ASA) physical status, Child-Turcotte-Pugh(CTP) classification, indications, preanesthetic problems, endoscopic procedure, successful completion of the procedure, anesthesia time, recovery time, and anesthetic agents, was recorded. Adverse events, including hypotension, hypertension, bradycardia, and hypoxia, were also noted.RESULTS Propofol and sufentanil anesthesia was provided in 182 procedures involving 140 men and 42 women aged 56.1± 11.7 years(range, 25-83 years). The patients weighed 71.4 ± 10.7 kg(range, 45-95 kg) and had ASA physical status classifications of Ⅱ(79 patients) or Ⅲ(103 patients). Ninety-five patients had a CTP classification of A and 87 had a CTP classification of B. Intravenous anesthesia was successful in all cases. The mean anesthesia time was 33.1 ± 5.8 min. The mean recovery time was 12.3 ± 3.7 min. Hypotension occurred in two patients(1.1%, 2/182). No patient showed hypertension during the endoscopic therapy procedure. Bradycardia occurred in one patient(0.5%, 1/182), and hypoxia occurred in one patient(0.5%, 1/182). All complications were easily treated with no adverse sequelae. All endoscopic procedures were completed successfully.CONCLUSION The combined use of propofol and sufentanil injection in endotracheal intubation-assisted EIS for EVs is effective and safe.
基金Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation ofChina (No. 30772090)the Natural Science Foundation of ZhejiangProvince (No. Y204141)+2 种基金the Foundation from Science and Technology Department of Zhejiang Province (No. 2007R10034)theFoundation from Personnel Department of Zhejiang Province (NoJ20050046)the Foundation from Health Department of ZhejiangProvince (No. 2007QN007), China
文摘Background: Sevoflurane and propofol are effective cardioprotective anaesthetic agents, though the cardioprotection of propofol has not been shown in humans. Their roles and underlying mechanisms in anesthetic postconditioning are unclear. Mitochondrial permeability transition pore (MPTP) opening is a major cause of ischemia-reperfusion injury. Here we investigated sevoflurane- and propofol-induced postconditioning and their relationship with MPTP. Methods: Isolated perfused rat hearts were exposed to 40 min of ischemia followed by 1 h of reperfusion. During the first 15 min of reperfusion, hearts were treated with either control buffer (CTRL group) or buffer containing 20 μmol/L atractyloside (ATR group), 3% (v/v) sevoflurane (SPC group), 50 μmol/L propofol (PPC group), or the combination of atractyloside with respective anesthetics (SPC+ATR and PPC+ATR groups). Infarct size was determined by dividing the total necrotic area of the left ventricle by the total left ventricular slice area (percent necrotic area). Results: Hearts treated with sevoflurane or propofol showed significantly better recovery of coronary flow, end-diastolic pressures, left ventricular developed pressure and derivatives compared with controls. Sevoflurane resulted in more protective alteration of hemodynamics at most time point of reperfusion than propofol. These improvements were paralleled with the reduction of lactate dehydrogenase release and the decrease of infarct size (SPC vs CTRL: (17.48±2.70)% vs (48.47±6.03)%, P<0.05; PPC vs CTRL: (35.60±2.10)% vs (48.47±6.03)%, P<0.05). SPC group had less infarct size than PPC group (SPC vs PPC: (17.48±2.70)% vs (35.60±2.10)%, P<0.05). Atractyloside coadministration attenuated or completely blocked the cardioprotective effect of postconditioning of sevoflurane and propofol. Conclusion: Postconditioning of sevoflurane and propofol has cardio-protective effect against ischemia-reperfusion injury of heart, which is associated with inhibition of MPTP opening. Compared to propofol, sevoflurane provides superior protection of functional recovery and infarct size.
基金Supported by "Bates" Clinic, Svetice 15, Zagreb, Croatia, in the form of grant, equipment and drugs
文摘AIM： To analyze the hemodynamic and respiratory effects of propofol on patients undergoing gastroscopy and colonoscopy. METHODS： In this prospective study, conducted over a period of three years, 1,104 patients referred for a same day GI endoscopy procedure were analyzed. All patients were given a propofol bolus （0.5-1.5 mg/kg）. Arterial blood pressure （BP） was monitored at 3 rain intervals and heart rate and oxygen saturation （SpO2） were recorded continuously by pulse oximetry. Analyzed data acquisition was carried out before, during, and after the procedure. RESULTS： A statistically significant reduction in mean arterial pressure was demonstrated （P〈0.001） when compared to pre-intervention values, but severe hypotension, defined as a systolic blood pressure below 60mmHg, was noted in only 5 patients （0.5%）. Oxygen saturation decreased from 96.5% to 94.4 % （P〈0.001）. A critical decrease in oxygen saturation （〈90%） was documented in 27 patients （2.4%）. CONCLUSION： Our results showed that propofol provided good sedation with excellent pain control, a short recovery time and no significant hemodynamic side effelts if carefully titrated. All the patients （and especially ASA Ⅲ group） require monitoring and care of an anesthesiologist.
文摘Compared to standard endoscopy,endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography(ERCP)and endoscopic ultrasound(EUS)are often lengthier and more complex,thus requiring higher doses of sedatives for patient comfort and compliance.The aim of this review is to provide the reader with information regarding the use,safety profile,and merits of propofol for sedation in advanced endoscopic procedures like ERCP and EUS,based on the current literature.
基金supported by a grant from the Medical Scientific Research Fundation of Zhejiang Province (2013KYA060)
文摘BACKGROUND: Propofol is one of the extensively and commonly used intravenous anesthetics and has the ability to influence the proliferation, motility, and invasiveness of many cancer cells. In this study, the effects of propofol on hepatocellular carcinoma cells invasion ability were examined. METHODS: We assessed the invasion ability of HepG2 cells in vitro by determining enzyme activity and protein expression of MMP-9 using gelatin zymography assay and Western blot. The real-time PCR was used to evaluate the effect of propofol on microRNA-199a (miR-199a) expression, and miR-199a-2 precursor to evaluate whether over-expression of miR-199a can affect MMP-9 expression. Finally, the effect of miR-199a on propofol-induced anti-tumor activity using anti-miR-199a was assessed. RESULTS: Propofol significantly elevated the expression of miR-199a and inhibited the invasiveness of HepG2 cells. Propofol also efficiently decreased enzyme activity and protein expression of MMP-9. Moreover, the over-expression of miR-199a decreased MMP-9 protein level. Interestingly, the neutralization of miR-199a by anti-miR-199a antibody reversed the effect of propofol on alleviation of tumor invasiveness and inhibition of MMP-9 activity in HepG2 cells. CONCLUSION: Propofol decreases hepatocellular carcinoma cell invasiveness, which is partly due to the down-regulation of MMP-9 expression by miR-199a.
文摘AIM:To investigate the effect of propofol on human pancreatic cells and the molecular mechanism of propofol action.METHODS:We used the human pancreatic cancer cell line MIAPaCa-2 for in vitro studies measuring growth inhibition and degree of apoptotic cell death induced by propofol alone,gemcitabine alone,or propofol followed by gemcitabine.All experiments were conducted in triplicate and carried out on three or more separate occasions.Data were means of the three or more independent experiments±SE.Statistically significant differences were determined by two-tailed unpaired Student’s t test and defined as P<0.05.RESULTS:Pretreatment of cells with propofol for 24 h followed by gemcitabine resulted in 24%-75% growth inhibition compared with 6%-18%when gemcitabine was used alone.Overall growth inhibition was directly correlated with apoptotic cell death.We also showed that propofol potentiated gemcitabine-induced killing by downregulation of nuclear factor-κB(NF-κB).In contrast,NF-κB was upregulated when pancreatic cancer cells were exposed to gemcitabine alone,suggesting a potential mechanism of acquired chemoresistance.CONCLUSION:Inactivation of the NF-κB signaling pathway by propofol might abrogate gemcitabineinduced activation of NF-κB,resulting in chemosensitization of pancreatic tumors to gemcitabine.
基金the Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province,No.2009CDB130Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (HUST),No.M2009049
文摘Propofol preconditioning has been shown to provide neuroprotection against spinal ischemia/reperfusion injury. In this study, spinal cord ischemia/repeffusion injury was induced by blocking the abdominal aorta in rabbits for 40 minutes. Results showed that the co-application of propofol preconditioning and postconditioning regimen ameliorated pathological injury of the ischemic spinal cord and suppressed the elevation of malondialdehyde levels and increased superoxide dismutase activities in the spinal cord tissues. Co-application of propofol preconditioning and postconditioning resulted in potent protective effects against spinal cord ischemia/reperfusion injury and prolonged the spinal cord＇s tolerance to ischemia. This protection was associated with the anti-lipid peroxidation capacity of the spinal cord tissues.
文摘BACKGROUND:In general,the dose requirement and complications of propofol are lower when used in the diluted form than in the undiluted form.The aim of this study was to determine the dose requirement and complications of diluted and undiluted propofol for deep sedation in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.METHODS:Eighty-six patients were randomly assigned to either group D (diluted propofol) or U (undiluted propofol).All patients were sedated with 0.02-0.03 mg/kg midazolam (total dose ≤2 mg for age <70 years and 1 mg for age ≥70) and 0.5-1 μg/kg fentanyl (total dose ≤75 μg for age <70 and ≤50 μg for age ≥70).Patients in group U (42) were sedated with standard undiluted propofol (10 mg/mL).Patients in group D (44) were sedated with diluted propofol (5 mg/mL).All patients in both groups were monitored for the depth of sedation using the Narcotrend system.The primary outcome variable was the total dose of propofol used during the procedure.The secondary outcome variables were complications during and immediately after the procedure,and recovery time.RESULTS:All endoscopies were completed successfully.Mean propofol doses per body weight and per body weight per hour in groups D and U were 3.0 mg/kg,6.2 mg/kg per hour and 4.7 mg/kg,8.0 mg/kg per hour,respectively.The mean dose of propofol,expressed as total dose,dose/kg or dose/kg per hour and the recovery time were not significantly different between the two groups.Sedation-related adverse events during and immediately after the procedure were higher in group U (42.9%) than in group D (18.2%) (P=0.013).CONCLUSIONS:Propofol requirement and recovery time in the diluted and undiluted propofol groups were comparable.However,the sedation-related hypotension was significantly lower in the diluted group than the undiluted group.
