EDITOR'S NOTE: Human rights protection in prisons is an important part of China's National Human Rights Action Plan and the human rights conditions in prisons constitute an important hallmark of the human rights pr...EDITOR'S NOTE: Human rights protection in prisons is an important part of China's National Human Rights Action Plan and the human rights conditions in prisons constitute an important hallmark of the human rights protection level of the country. In order to get to know more about human rights protection in this special area, this reporter paid a visit to the No. 4 Prison in Henan Province, central China.展开更多
文摘EDITOR'S NOTE: Human rights protection in prisons is an important part of China's National Human Rights Action Plan and the human rights conditions in prisons constitute an important hallmark of the human rights protection level of the country. In order to get to know more about human rights protection in this special area, this reporter paid a visit to the No. 4 Prison in Henan Province, central China.
文摘目的调查西部某省监狱警察身心状况,分析其情绪耗竭状况及影响因素。方法2022年11—12月,对西部某省2127名监狱警察进行问卷调查,调查其一般资料及身心健康状况,采用《职业情绪耗竭量表》(Emotional Exhaustion Scale)、《感知组织支持量表》(Organizational Support Scale)调查其情绪耗竭和感知组织支持得分,比较一线与非一线监狱警察的身心状况差异,并对其情绪耗竭的影响因素进行多元线性回归分析。结果回收有效问卷2013份,有效率94.64%。有23.94%的监狱警察自评身体状况欠佳,一线人员自评欠佳的占比高于非一线人员(P<0.001)。监狱警察总群体中高情绪耗竭报告率为32.84%,调查对象工作压力主要来源于工作家庭不能兼顾(占85.39%)、工作责任重大(占76.55%)、督查追责(占66.67%)。多元线性回归分析结果表明:监狱警察家庭负担情况每上升1个等级(无老人和小孩,有老人或小孩,同时有老人和小孩),其情绪耗竭得分平均提高2.868分(P=0.020);相比健康身体状况者,自评身体状况欠佳的监狱警察情绪耗竭得分平均提高4.418分(P<0.001);相比无生理疾病者,出现生理疾病的监狱警察情绪耗竭得分平均提高2.915分(P=0.09);监狱警察家人对监狱工作态度每上升1个等级(非常支持、比较支持、不支持),其情绪耗竭得分平均提高3.202分(P=0.001);监狱警察每周值夜班次数每上升1个等级(0~2、3~4、≥5次),其情绪耗竭得分平均提高5.132分(P=0.008);相比非一线工作模式,一线工作模式的监狱警察情绪耗竭得分平均提高2.785分(P=0.043);感知组织支持得分每增加1分,监狱警察情绪耗竭得分平均降低5.102分(P<0.001)。结论西部某省监狱警察群体特别是一线人员工作负担大,存在一定程度的不良生理状况及情绪耗竭等负面问题。建议相关部门从强化后勤保障、优化工作模式、减轻工作负担和提升组织支持力度等方面,保护监狱警察队伍身心健康。