Multiple-treatments meta-analysis is thought to be a feasible method to compare the efficacy and safety among different treatments, especially when there was no head-to-head research among some treatments. But sometim...Multiple-treatments meta-analysis is thought to be a feasible method to compare the efficacy and safety among different treatments, especially when there was no head-to-head research among some treatments. But sometimes some conclusions are inconsistent with the clinical experience. Recently, we read a multiple-treatment meta-analysis finished by Stefen Leucht et al, which was published in Lancet） The authors summarized the results of the RCT studies on 15 antipsychotics commonly used in practice; they also horizontally compared the efficacy and safety profile by the recta-analysis. We believe that the results provide more solid evidence for the rational usage of antipsychotics to the psychiatrists, also for the government to distribute health resources in a more reasonable way.展开更多
文摘Multiple-treatments meta-analysis is thought to be a feasible method to compare the efficacy and safety among different treatments, especially when there was no head-to-head research among some treatments. But sometimes some conclusions are inconsistent with the clinical experience. Recently, we read a multiple-treatment meta-analysis finished by Stefen Leucht et al, which was published in Lancet） The authors summarized the results of the RCT studies on 15 antipsychotics commonly used in practice; they also horizontally compared the efficacy and safety profile by the recta-analysis. We believe that the results provide more solid evidence for the rational usage of antipsychotics to the psychiatrists, also for the government to distribute health resources in a more reasonable way.
