Tremendous advances have been made in recent years addressing the key obstacles to safe performance and introduction of human natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES). Animal studies have focused on ide...Tremendous advances have been made in recent years addressing the key obstacles to safe performance and introduction of human natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES). Animal studies have focused on identifying optimal solutions to these obstacles, in particular methods of creating transluminal access,safe closure of the point of access, and development of a multitasking platform with dedicated instruments. Whether the performance data generated from these animal studies can be reproduced in humans has yet to be determined. Reports of human NOTES procedures are emerging, and the possibility of accomplishing human NOTES based on existing technology has been demonstrated. However, dedicated platforms and devices are still lacking to allow for pure NOTES procedures, and whether NOTES can deliver the postulated benef its of earlier recovery and improved cosmesis remains uncertain.展开更多
BACKGROUND: The study aimed to estimate the value of embryonal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery(ENOTES) in treating severe acute pancreatitis(SAP) complicated with abdominal compartment syndrome(ACS).ME...BACKGROUND: The study aimed to estimate the value of embryonal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery(ENOTES) in treating severe acute pancreatitis(SAP) complicated with abdominal compartment syndrome(ACS).METHODS: The patients, who were randomized into an ENOTES group and an operative group, underwent ENOTES and laparotomy, respectively. The results and complications of the two groups were compared.RESULTS: Enterocinesia was observed earlier in the ENOTES group than in the operative group. Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II(APACHE II) score of patients in the ENOTES group was lower than that of the operative group on the 1st, 3rd and 5th post-operative day(P<0.05). The cure rate was 96.87% in the ENOTES group, which was statistically different from 78.12% in the operative group(P<0.05). There were significant differences in complications and mortality between the two groups(P<0.01).CONCLUSION: Compared with surgical decompression, ENOTES associated with flexible endoscope therapy is an effective and minimal invasive procedure with less complications.展开更多
目的:探讨经自然腔道取出标本手术(NOSES)对直肠癌患者术后康复及免疫功能的影响。方法:回顾性分析2015年2月—2016年12月收治的98例直肠癌患者的临床资料,其中49例接受NOSES直肠癌根治术(观察组),49例采用传统腹腔镜直肠癌根治术(对照...目的:探讨经自然腔道取出标本手术(NOSES)对直肠癌患者术后康复及免疫功能的影响。方法:回顾性分析2015年2月—2016年12月收治的98例直肠癌患者的临床资料,其中49例接受NOSES直肠癌根治术(观察组),49例采用传统腹腔镜直肠癌根治术(对照组),分析两组患者的相关临床指标以及手术前后应激因子与免疫功能指标的变化。结果:观察组患者术后排气时间短于对照组(2.62 d vs. 3.31 d,P<0.05);手术时间、术中出血量、淋巴结清扫数目与对照组无统计学差异(均P>0.05)。两组患者术前E-选择素、内皮素(ET)、可溶性血管细胞黏附分子1(sVCAM-1)、基质金属蛋白酶9(MMP-9)、免疫球蛋白水平均无统计学差异(均P>0.05),观察组患者术后E-选择素、ET、sVCAM-1、MMP-9水平明显低于对照组,而免疫球蛋白水平明显高于对照组(均P<0.05)。观察组患者并发症发生率低于对照组(8.16%vs. 18.37%),但差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:NOSES直肠癌根治术可达到与传统手术相同的肿瘤学根治目的,且可减少应激因子的表达,对机体免疫功能影响较小,安全性高,患者恢复快。展开更多
文摘Tremendous advances have been made in recent years addressing the key obstacles to safe performance and introduction of human natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES). Animal studies have focused on identifying optimal solutions to these obstacles, in particular methods of creating transluminal access,safe closure of the point of access, and development of a multitasking platform with dedicated instruments. Whether the performance data generated from these animal studies can be reproduced in humans has yet to be determined. Reports of human NOTES procedures are emerging, and the possibility of accomplishing human NOTES based on existing technology has been demonstrated. However, dedicated platforms and devices are still lacking to allow for pure NOTES procedures, and whether NOTES can deliver the postulated benef its of earlier recovery and improved cosmesis remains uncertain.
文摘BACKGROUND: The study aimed to estimate the value of embryonal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery(ENOTES) in treating severe acute pancreatitis(SAP) complicated with abdominal compartment syndrome(ACS).METHODS: The patients, who were randomized into an ENOTES group and an operative group, underwent ENOTES and laparotomy, respectively. The results and complications of the two groups were compared.RESULTS: Enterocinesia was observed earlier in the ENOTES group than in the operative group. Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II(APACHE II) score of patients in the ENOTES group was lower than that of the operative group on the 1st, 3rd and 5th post-operative day(P<0.05). The cure rate was 96.87% in the ENOTES group, which was statistically different from 78.12% in the operative group(P<0.05). There were significant differences in complications and mortality between the two groups(P<0.01).CONCLUSION: Compared with surgical decompression, ENOTES associated with flexible endoscope therapy is an effective and minimal invasive procedure with less complications.
文摘目的:探讨经自然腔道取出标本手术(NOSES)对直肠癌患者术后康复及免疫功能的影响。方法:回顾性分析2015年2月—2016年12月收治的98例直肠癌患者的临床资料,其中49例接受NOSES直肠癌根治术(观察组),49例采用传统腹腔镜直肠癌根治术(对照组),分析两组患者的相关临床指标以及手术前后应激因子与免疫功能指标的变化。结果:观察组患者术后排气时间短于对照组(2.62 d vs. 3.31 d,P<0.05);手术时间、术中出血量、淋巴结清扫数目与对照组无统计学差异(均P>0.05)。两组患者术前E-选择素、内皮素(ET)、可溶性血管细胞黏附分子1(sVCAM-1)、基质金属蛋白酶9(MMP-9)、免疫球蛋白水平均无统计学差异(均P>0.05),观察组患者术后E-选择素、ET、sVCAM-1、MMP-9水平明显低于对照组,而免疫球蛋白水平明显高于对照组(均P<0.05)。观察组患者并发症发生率低于对照组(8.16%vs. 18.37%),但差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:NOSES直肠癌根治术可达到与传统手术相同的肿瘤学根治目的,且可减少应激因子的表达,对机体免疫功能影响较小,安全性高,患者恢复快。
